Comments on: Children Of The Con http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/ "...a somewhat popular blogger" Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:47:18 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Angelos http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/comment-page-1/#comment-3632 Angelos Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:52:59 +0000 http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/#comment-3632 <p>Um, Olbermann quit because of just that.</p> Um, Olbermann quit because of just that.

]]> By: JayBrida http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/comment-page-1/#comment-3615 JayBrida Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:10:46 +0000 http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/#comment-3615 <p>You’re not kidding TomHilton, it’s this kind of thing (at least Obermann <i>mentioned</i> the other media, even though he ignored the NY Times, etc) that will drive Bob Somerby into an early grave.</p> You’re not kidding TomHilton, it’s this kind of thing (at least Obermann mentioned the other media, even though he ignored the NY Times, etc) that will drive Bob Somerby into an early grave.

]]> By: TomHilton http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/comment-page-1/#comment-3602 TomHilton Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:12:26 +0000 http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/#comment-3602 <p>Olbermann’s rant would be funnier if he hadn’t been part of that 22-hour-a-day obsession. </p> <p>Still pretty funny, though.</p> Olbermann’s rant would be funnier if he hadn’t been part of that 22-hour-a-day obsession.

Still pretty funny, though.

]]> By: bobwan http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/comment-page-1/#comment-3600 bobwan Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:03:41 +0000 http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/#comment-3600 <p>The links back to the old site make me miss it all the more. This site, after all this time, STILL sucks. Call me old fashioned. I still forgive the holiday lack of posts, but don’t push me, fella.</p> The links back to the old site make me miss it all the more. This site, after all this time, STILL sucks. Call me old fashioned. I still forgive the holiday lack of posts, but don’t push me, fella.

]]> By: quakerinabasement http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/comment-page-1/#comment-3598 quakerinabasement Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:34:30 +0000 http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/#comment-3598 <p>Mmmmmm. That’s some tasty snark! TBogg is back!</p> Mmmmmm. That’s some tasty snark! TBogg is back!

]]> By: captphealy http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/comment-page-1/#comment-3596 captphealy Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:29:21 +0000 http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/#comment-3596 <p>Does having a rectum full of Post-Its explain that weird excuse for a smile Bill Kristol always wears in public?</p> <p>And Ms. Muppetmouth probably thinks she’s made the big leagues, now that KO has deigned to pay attention to something she said. She probably thinks this places her “up” there with O’Reilly and Coulter. Sadly for her, she’s right.</p> Does having a rectum full of Post-Its explain that weird excuse for a smile Bill Kristol always wears in public?

And Ms. Muppetmouth probably thinks she’s made the big leagues, now that KO has deigned to pay attention to something she said. She probably thinks this places her “up” there with O’Reilly and Coulter. Sadly for her, she’s right.

]]> By: Julia http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/comment-page-1/#comment-3587 Julia Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:35:49 +0000 http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/01/28/children-of-the-con/#comment-3587 <p>I don’t know how you follow this stuff. It seems as if it must be really painful.</p> I don’t know how you follow this stuff. It seems as if it must be really painful.

]]>