…it’s nice to see that I pissed everyone off this morning.
Now that we’ve established that I’m a hack, an asshole, a douche, and a very naughty boy who had disappointed his family in oh so many ways, I shall elaborate.
My point is, was, and will remain: I’m not going to reward bad behavior by voting for the person who would destroy the party unless they get the nomination. I don’t believe that she is going to get the nomination but if she were to somehow pull enough strings to basically rip it from Barack Obama’s hands, there is no way in hell that she could win. I’m not talking about people who are hard core supporters of either one of them, I’m talking about people who would be so disgusted by her actions and the process that they would sit on their hands rather than vote for her. I know it would happen and you know it would happen.
To put it another way: Hillary Clinton is like a mother standing on a bridge threatening to throw her baby in the river unless she is named Mother of the Year.
As Steve Benen puts it:
I’m 35, and have been following politics for quite a while, and I’ve never been so disappointed with a politician I’ve admired and respected. Yesterday’s tactics weren’t just wrong, they were offensive. For that matter, they seem to be part of a deliberate strategy to tear Democrats apart and ensure a defeat in November.
For several weeks, I’ve appreciated the fact that Clinton considers herself the superior candidate, and has kept her campaign going in the hopes, from her perspective, of saving the party from itself. But after yesterday, it’s become impossible for me to consider Clinton’s intentions honorable. Her conduct is not that of a leader.
What’s so striking is the shamelessness of her reversal(s). When Florida and Michigan broke party rules and were punished by the DNC, Clinton not only supported the decision, she honored it and spoke publicly about those votes not counting. One of her own top strategists was responsible for making the decision in the first place. Now, Clinton is saying, “Never mind what I said and did before.”
Clinton and her campaign insisted that this was a race for delegates, as per party rules. Now, Clinton is saying, “Never mind what I said and did before.” Clinton and her campaign said the finish line was 2,025. Now, Clinton is saying, “Never mind what I said and did before.”
Instead of trying to help bring the party together — Election Day is 24 weeks away — Clinton went to Florida to argue that if Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee, his nomination will be illegitimate. And if the DNC plays by the rules Clinton used to support, it’s guilty of vote-suppression — comparable to slavery, Jim Crow, and Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe.
[...]
Many Dems have been waiting for a soft landing, a graceful exit, a classy wrap-up. Clinton, for reasons that I want desperately to understand, has chosen to abandon these norms and instead choose a destructive, divisive path.
She’s playing a dangerous game in which the only winner is the Republican Party.
I’m more than willing to vote against my own enlightened self-interest, I’ve done so for years, but I’m not willing to vote for a Democrat who exhibits the selfish stupidity of a Republican.
Login Here





64 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
well, that previous thread went nicely.
I do think there’s some issue at hand of voting for McCain because Clinton has been a bad mother.
I think the worst I would do is sit this out. If for some wild hair of a reason Clinton does get the nomination, I would have to think on this long and hard. I wouldn’t vote for McCain, but I might go as far as to not vote. I certainly wouldn’t volunteer and I wouldn’t give money.
I just couldn’t vote for McCain.
At the same time. When is enough enough? It was a seriously hard decision to decide between Clinton and Obama when they campaigned in my state. Now, after all these other states, I’m glad I voted for Obama.
I say here what I say on the clinton “I’ll never vote for Obama blogs” what part of fucking politics don’t you understand? If everyone stays home out of pique because they didn’t get their special flavor of democratic candidate we are assured of getting John McCain because he sure as hell will show up to cast a vote for himself. That really isn’t something I want to contemplate. Clinton could eat a live baby on tv for all I care and she would still make a better president than mr. bomb bomb iran/I want to put more scalia’s on the bench. Luckily for you you won’t ever have to vote for clinton so all this talk is just, well, talk. But for christ’s sake when we are working over clinton’s loyal supporters with a strappado every minute telling them not to be such fucking wanking naderites do you have to throw your considerable powers of persuasion onto the fire like fucking gasoline?
aimai
Yes. I do. I’m stupid that way.
TBogg, it’s all good. I wouldn’t sweat the hand-wringers. You should hear what my wife and I have been blurting out about her at home on a semi-daily basis. The difference between us (and you) and rabid Hillary supporters is we’re not setting up “Hillary or McBust” PACs or cheering on Little Green Footfungus for smearing our candidate’s opponent.
I’m fairly safe here in NY not voting for her (although she may be jeopardizing even that), so if she’s the nominee I might just write in one of the Hillshills’ newly-minted Satans like Keith Olbermann or Donna Brazile. Just for shits n’ giggles.
But if she continues with this wingnut-like bullshit all the way to the convention and doesn’t get the nomination, I’m sure quite a few of my fellow NYers will be looking for the next Ned Lamont. Something tells me the Repubs won’t get behind her like they got behind Lieberman if she goes indie.
And BTW, that mother on a bridge line is solid snark gold.
Obama as of late has been very gracious to Clinton. Not in deed, but at least in word. He’s definitely trying to get the Clintonistas to see that he supports their policies, but is not willing to get a sex change.
Unfortunately, I can see Clintons’s big selling point ot the left being: “Whattya gonna do, vote for McCain? I dare ya! I double dare ya!”
If it were only your self-interest you were voting against, I wouldn’t mind. After all, you and yours do fine under Republican regimes. It’s all those others, the ones who won’t do fine under another Republican President, that makes voting for anyone other than the Democratic candidate an act of destructive cruelty.
I don’t think that’s what TBogg has said here or in the previous thread. His position seems, to me, to be that a vote for HRC after the way she has campaigned would be, to use his precise words here, to “reward bad behavior”. I couldn’t agree with that sentiment more. In fact, the idea that she gets a reward of of any kind, be it help in retiring campaign debt, a veep slot, or (worst idea I’ve heard recently) the Senate Majority Leader position, makes me nauseous, and not in a metaphorical sense.
As I said in the previous thread, I’ll vote for HRC, even as Veep, in November as an anti-McCain vote. But I sincerely hope that I will never have to.
I’m with Tbogg right up to the point where he wouldn’t vote for Clinton in the general; that’s where I get off. Four more years of Republican rule would be a catastrophe, and if averting that catastrophic result requires “rewarding bad behavior”, so be it.
Sure, and I’m not such a party loyalist that I’ll vote for whatever dirtbag gets the nomination.
That being said, I will support and vote for Obama. I’ll (at this point) hold my nose and vote for Clinton.
I’m with you, TBogg. Screw’em. Here;s something to cheer you up…
As I mentioned in the last thread, as a Chicagoan, it would very easy to sit this one out. All of my people are going to win here anyway.
But if my vote did make a difference, if you asked me today, I would not vote for Hillary. I can certainly understand the sentiment of people who disagree.
The thing is, Hillary is making me really mad right now. In six months, I have no doubt that I’ll be furious with McCain, and I’ll hate him by then much more than I hate Hillary right now. Point being, I think it’s stupid for anyone to say right now that they will or won’t vote for Hillary or Obama in November. There’s a lot of shit that is going to come from the other side that is going to make either candidate VERY appealing by the time we get to election day.
Sorry TBogg, no sale. Obama could have settled this clusterfuck long ago when the DNC offered revotes in both states, that Obama refused.
Listen. And understand. That candidate is out there. She can’t be bargained with. She can’t be reasoned with. She doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And she absolutely will not stop, ever, until she is the nominee.
a-fucking-men.
and amen to aimai too. (btw, i’m a longtime lurker on many of the blogs you comment on, and i’d like take this opportunity to tell you that you rock!)
I have to agree w/ TBogg. I won’t vote for Hillary if she is the nominee. Period. I really think that Gov. Bill Richardson nailed it when he said that the Clintons have an air of entitlement.
She has lied – oops, my bad, “mis-spoke” – about being under sniper fire.
She agreed to play by the rules of the DNC when it looked like she was going to win. She is coming across as someone who will do just about anything to get what she wants.
“Bush in pantsuits” (paraphrasing a previous commenter) sums her up.
The United States is ready for a woman president. But it won’t be Hillary.
I meant this to cheer you up…
http://www.tagg-theangrygayguy…..-this.html
Its my understanding that Obama didn’t refuse the revotes. He refused to *pay* for the revotes.
Well I will vote for Hillary but I second Steve Benen’s comment and completely understand Tbogg’s feelings. I have made the decision not to vote for the Democratic gubernatorial candidate once because he was running as “republican lite”. I do feel that there are times when it is better to have an honest enemy than a false friend. We speak of “more and better democrats” and sometimes you have to give up the “more” in order to get the “better. The truth is, I supported Edwards. I had no strong preference for Hillary or Barack until Hillary decided to challenge the Nevada Caucuses on the heals of SEIU’s decision to back Barack Obama. This was the start of a trend that has simply disgusted me and my husband. We will still, both of us, vote for her but I doubt we would be inclined to donate money or any other kind of support.
Tbogg, I’m with you. Hillary is proving to be exactly as dishonest and unprincipled as Bush ever was when it comes to self-promotion and power-hunger. If she’s willing to stoop to this bullshit and expect people to go along with it just because it’s politics as usual, she deserves to lose.
I am 99 44/100% certain that I would vote for Hillary Clinton in the general. The Clinton For Clinton Party would almost certainly be an improvement over the Republican Party in the White House.
My time and money would be going toward a buttload of minders in the House and Senate, though.
I left this comment on an equally frothing pro-Clinton post at NoQuarter:
“Well, hopefully people will calm down a bit after the convention, take a cold look at their options, and realize that a McCain administration would be disaster, for the supreme court nominations alone. As the Nader supporters demonstrated in 2000, following absolutist principles that are at odds with reality can have terrible real-world consequences.”
Please people, be adults, think about how our nation’s political system works, and pick the lesser of two evils in November. This is not a game.
Gack. I can’t stay home and sit on my hands, they get all grabby when I do that. Just blindfold me and point me in the direction of the booth. My Dem radar will do the rest. I could never stay home and I could NEVER vote for Pasty McTemper.
(voice of slim pickens — you 35 yr-olds can google him)
So, great, after barack gits elected, y’all cain petition him to send ol’ hillary down to gitmo fer all her lies and village burnin’ and shreddin’ up the party and ever’ thing.
maybe barack can do a little cheney-logic on her:
she was fuckin’ up the president and… well, he werent actually yet the president, y’see, but now that he is, we can look back and see that at that time he was the future-president and she was fuckin him up, and so she was a national security threat: threatenin’ the future president. so she’sa gonna go to gitmo, by gawd.
and then we can all get on board the slim pickins express to washington for the big inaugural ball and listen to “i’ll be seeing you…” for about 10,000 years.
(move from slim pickens voice to tom waits voice)
me, i like the scene where we’re all standing around at the peoples’ inaugural ball sippin’ our champagne and our tears are all a glistenin’ — and hillary takes a spin around the dance floor with barack, to applause, and we’re tipsy and we’re all “boy, she was scarin’ the shit outa me back in May…” and we’re all, ” i didnt know what the hell she was doin’” and you know just laughin’ and happy. and then michele comes out, and bill comes out and the two couples dance around and we think it is just perfect, just perfect, and the chamagne flows, then we all just dance the night away…as tom and band segue into “who am i kiddin’” — with a drum solo of my forehead on my desk.
Getting worked up over this is like getting worked up over the last Super Bowl.
The New York Giants won, ok?
This joint is beginning to remind of JFK assassination news groups.
Ever go on a JFK assassination news group?
People arguing endlessly over moot points.
Hillary can’t really hurt Obama, although a graceless exit might make Kathleen Sebelius a more attractive Veep.
Let’s go back to talking about what a shithead McCain is and let the nomination process play out.
Did you know that Aimai is now blogging at If I Ran the Zoo?
Hillary’s main cheering section is now Faux News. That says it all. Lanny Davis going on and saying they’ve been right all these years, and now he understands what it’s like to be a Republican. We don’t need two Republicans in the race.
“…likening her struggle for these delegates to the nation’s historic struggles to free the slaves and grant women the right to vote.” Steve Benen
Holy moley! You cannot make this stuff up.
I will not believe it if she takes this all the way to the convention. Surely Hill & Bill are smarter than this. Talk about trash your legacy….
If she keeps this crap up, I can see myself going over to the darkside with tbogg.
Lot of twisted underwear in that last thread. Does anyone really think TBogg is going to change anyone’s mind? There was certainly no indication that he was trying to. He just made a personal statement, one that required a bit of balls at that. I wouldn’t do what he would – so what?
Hillary’s main cheering section is now Faux News.
Yeah but who gives a fuck? Seriously…
It’s like getting mad at the thought of the San Diego Padres getting robbed of a championship in ‘08…
In fact, this is the bottom line question — Who is going to end up with the worst losing percentage — the aforementioned Padres, my beloved but light hitting Giants, or John “Gaffe-a-Minute” McCain?
Don’t be suprised if it’s McCain.
Last two TBogg posts are perfect.
This one, too:
Rachel Maddow puts Democratic Party on suicide watch
http://www.rumproast.com/index…..ide_watch/
Relax, folks, this is ridiculous. She’s not going to win the nomination … and I’m a supporter of hers. She’s won a lot of votes though and she’s entitled to take it all the way up to the convention. The partisan world has gotten much wimpier in the last 2 or 3 decades as I can remember candidates who were much further away from victory staying alive as candidates right up till the actual balloting. The call for Hillary to get out seems a little typical of the old politics of the last few decades since it seems rooted in the idea that the campaign is just a couple of moose making feints at one another until one runs off without any real bloodshed. Let every state have the opportunity to vote in an ongoing contest and maybe we’ll get the side benefit that the asinine competition to have the first primary will end and nobody will get excluded for breaking party rules next time.
Oh my yes — it takes balls for someone to take his ball and go home. Let’s all admire that for a moment.
I wish all the best to the middle class people who can afford to endure another 4 or 8 years of Bush policy. I might be able to afford it (serious health conditions make that a “might” because healthcare is only going to get worse under McCain) but millions can’t and I’m not so fucking stupid to believe that a Clinton presidency would not be vastly better for those people than a McCain admin.
Why people continue to imagine that their self-interests with regard to primary government policy is their “own” is baffling to me. Most of us share the same self-interests when you’re talking about essential quality of life policies. You can’t just vote against your own.
Guy Who Said Jehovah ‘08: Worse? How Could It Be Worse? Jehovah Jehovah Jehovah!!1!1!
Hey seventtwentyfour…. who says middle class people can endure another 4 or 8 years of Bush policy? I see them hanging on by their bleeding fingernails. I see them nervous and worried about how they’ll pay the bills and save for their kids’ education and keep their jobs, their homes, their health…
For that reason, we’ll all get together and prevent this train wreck (McCain)…and save America.
Rachel Maddow’s theory now is that Clinton wants to prolong the Florida/Michigan fiasco as a means of denying there is a Democratic nominee and taking her beef to the convention. Rachel further thinks that insures a McCain victory.
Unfortunately, after watching Hillary’s performance of the last couple days, I think Maddow is right. Her campaign is now insisting there can’t be any negotiated settlement, the delegates must be seated as is and Michigan’s uncomitted delegates shall remain uncomitted because he got no votes. Not a reasonable position, but one that insures there will be no settlement.
A Hillary presidency would be that much better?
You sure?
The candidate who has gone out of her way to praise the Republican and denounce the Democrat at every turn?
The candidate who cheerled for the two worst foreign policy decisions in the post-Cold War era: NAFTA and the Iraq War?
The candidate who will change 60+ years of US nuclear posture in order to open the possibility of fulfilment of the sick Zionist fantasy of an “obliterated” Iran?
The only thing she’s got going for her is the bench, and I’m even starting to wonder about her judgement in that regard.
I’ll vote Green or Libertarian over Hillary if she steals the nomination.
After all, her husband was already the best Republican president in history.
I am totally disgusted with Hillary. However, rewarding bad behavior by voting for her is the lesser of the two evils, and it’s not even a close contest. Voting for McCain rewards bad behavior on a scale that dwarfs comprehension. I’d rather hold my nose and vote for her. It’s better than cutting off my nose to spite her.
And on a more acrid note, voting for McCain makes you stupider than Douglas Feith, so I’m sure you won’t.
It’s the only way she could ever become president.
If Obama wins he’ll probably get two terms, leaving the next meaningful election until 2016.
Hillary will be 72 against an incumbent vice-president in her own party, not to mention whatever troglodyte the GOPers dredge up.
Her only shot is a McCain defeat of Obama in November; after everyone spends those next four years yearning for the competence and restraint of the Bush administration she’ll ride in like Annie Oakley and save the country from destruction in 2012.
She’s willing to tank the entire thing to ensure that she still has a chance, however infinite, of becoming president.
If Obama wins, she’s finished.
Not to wander off topic, but I’ve wondered all through this campaign: who in their right mind would want to be president in 2009? I mean….. I guess someone’s gotta do it, but sweet Jeebus on a Ritz, was a monumental clusterfuck they’ll inherit. It’s obvious that none of the half-bright Republicans want it, since they’ve served up a nominee who is a half-assed geriatric at best, saddled with an ugly temper and a crazy-eyed heiress wife with a fondness for downers, and joined at the hip with the most despised American president in history.
Somewhere around 2012,when gas is $15.00 and the Mayan calendar is rolling over, things may be a bit tense. Who knows whether The Long Emergency or a new Golden Age lies beyond?
Still………… I’m hopeful. Obama has shown a real talent for staying on the high road and dodging the mud being slung about. I just hope that, once in office, he decides that it’s time for Murkans to have a serious dose of the Truth, because this national denial about who we are, and where we are, is literally destroying us.
Fuck this…. I need snark. And bassets.
TBogg, you’d never vote against the interests of your daughter.
Bottom line: the Supreme Court, reproductive freedom or forced pregnancy and it doesn’t matter as much who wins this election so much as who MUST lose – or girls and women do.
Anyone who desires the office of president of the United States is by nature unfit for the position.
There’s the rub.
Tommy Chong ‘08: Bong Bong Bong, Bong Bong Iran!
The problem isn’t that Hillary is still in the race, it’s that she’s running a shamefully dishonest campaign. I’m sick of this cynical Rovian strategy of pulling every dirty trick in the book, litigating every technicality, clouding every issue, all in the name of eeking out 50 percent of the vote plus one. It’s all justified, of course, since Hillary is just trying to make the world a better place for the common man.
You may say it’s just the reality of politics-as-usual, but I’ve had enough of this bullshit from Bush and the republicans, and I sure don’t want to belong to any party that thinks its mission is to out-sleaze the GOP.
and the ’scorched earth’ theory doesn’t explain anything. if she goes
down as nader ‘08, she will never come within 10,000 miles of the
nomination in 2012.
it has to be some kind of self-reinforcing delusion, like a bad road
company of marat/sade. meanwhile, the campaign sinks lower and lower
into the great dismal swamp — or the taylor marsh — and we get to watch.
lucky us.
TataTeryaki, Tbogg has already staked out his position there: his daughter will still be able to control her own uterus. Poorer (or more middle-class) women, not so much. But tB has already said he’ll be fine, so, hey, he’ll sit on his hands.
Look, she’s not my favorite candidate–John Edwards was, not least because he was (arguably, not definitively) the most populist candidate, and we have a unique opportunity, right here/now, for a populist message to be successful. That ship sailed.
And Obama? I’m sorry, but, as a long-time resident of his home state, the main reason people think he’s untainted is that he also hasn’t spent much time in the trenches. That’s not a reason to vote for Hil–at all–it’s merely pointing out that he hasn’t been tried. He also turned me off, way big-time, with his bullshit version of health insurance. That particular issue is breaking the back of all of us who will not be fine under another republican administration.
Yeah, okay, fine, Hil isn’t perfect, is in some ways downright despicable (frankly, I don’t follow the campaign, or read the blogs, or whatever, because I will NOT be okay if a republican is elected, so the references to her bad behavior are as much a mystery as any criticisms of BO would be). Whatever. Taking my ball and going home is not an option for me in this election, little though my personal vote will actually mean.
See, I don’t really buy that. Recent campaign efforts have been stupid but that’s just the sputterings of an engine that’s out of gas. Overall, I don’t think her campaign was significantly more dishonest than her competitors were.
No, Narya. He’ll be fine.
Voters with daughters should be nervous.
I’m with you Tbogg- and I’m in Texas, she won’t even bother to compete here, so why should I vote for her?
There never were meaningful “plans” for re-votes in FL and Michigan. There was nothing more than some vague suggestions, with absolutely no funding behind any of them, as well as very substantive legal and organizational and timing issues. Obama said I ain’t touchin’ anything you’ve got on the table, especially when I’m the only one, who by completing busting his campaign account, is being seriously looked to as the funding source.
You’re 100% right. Don’t let anyone talk you out of it.
Back in the days when the Democrats were desperately trying to win by being even more Republican than the Republicans, I used to say how much I wished for a Democrat who would run a balls-to-the-wall Rove/Atwater style campaign. Turns out I needed to be careful what I wished for. Ironic that just as the Democratic party gets rehabilitated and runs a guy with a positive-themed campaign, I get my wish.
I’ll still vote for Hillary if I have to. Her policies are pretty good. She’d probably make a good president. But I wouldn’t trust her for an instant.
Voters with daughters should be nervous.
Remember — SC Chief Justice John “I have the finest heterosexual family money could buy” Roberts has spoken wistfully about using Homeland Security drones to make sure nubile young Murkin girls aren’t sneaking across the border in search of the abortions he wants to make illegal here. Add one more Alito, and every time the L&T Casey travels to or from her offshore college, she’ll be peeing on a stick for the edification of the minimum-wage drone currently weighing toiletries and sniffing shoes. Democracy whiskey not-so-sexy!
Many years ago, a friend told me that if he had to choose between voting for Margaret Thatcher and voting for Armageddon, he would abstain.
thanks tomhilton, i did know that but until recently i’ve been so crazy busy with work i haven’t added to my blog reading list at all. now it’s a different story though. and incidentally, i think you rock too
I will never let my vote go fallow when there’s a Pervublican to vote against. Especially someone as McSame as Sidney is. Unlike TBogg, I do worse when there’s a Pervublican in the White House. The 00’s and the 80’s sucked for me.
I don’t want to reward Clinton. She’s been a naughty girl, and probably a nasty, naughty girl. But my desire to shun her will never sway me into letting Sidney anywhere near the presidency. Can’t do it.
Here’s my thought process:
At this point, the thought of voting for Hillary makes me want to vomit. Her continual moving of the goalposts, her ricockulous gas tax pandering, her ugly and divisive surrogates, and her hypocritical supporters (who call Obama folks a cult while promising never to vote for anyone but Hillary) all make it a choice I’d really rather not have to make.
But it’s a choice I do have to make. Not because I like rewarding bad behavior — after all, I don’t give my soon-to-be four-year-old a bowl of ice cream after he throws a tantrum. But when I think about voting for McCain over Clinton (if such a thing happens), I have to consider what I want for my country.
Do I want two more Scalia’s on the Supreme Court who will rip away the rights of workers, women and the LGBT community?
Do I want more wars in the Middle East?
Do I want Iraq war to continue for at least four more years?
Do I want to continue paying insane prices for gas and food?
Do I want to have the Earth continually treated like an outhouse by every corporation who donates enough campaign cash?
Do I want the rich to continue paying less in taxes than I do?
Do I want to cash in yet another one of our 401(k)’s to pay medical debt (like we did last year)?
No. Hell no. No way. Please no. Um … no. Nope. And hell fucking no.
So my only choice between McCain and Clinton is … Clinton.
It’s a crappy choice on some levels, and it would once again be a case of voting against someone rather than for someone.
But that’s just on a personal level—when you put aside the anger at her campaign’s stupidity and mendacity, her policies aren’t all that different from Obama’s and are ones I can easily support.
And in the end, that’s what it comes down to: Voting for the policies I believe will lead the country in the direction it needs to go and, in the process, helping those families who need it. Including mine.
Any animosity I have toward the political actions of the person enacting those policies is secondary.
She’s setting herself up for ‘12. She knows she won’t win the nomination, so she is damaging Obama as much as possible. She wants McCain to win this election. When ‘12 rolls around, McCain will be a proven disaster. She will run as the only cantidate that can beat McCain, since Obama already lost to him.
2 months ago Obama & Hillary should have been running against McCain.
If it came down to that, I’d vote for Clinton over McCain in the general, but I think that I’d have to have a stiff drink or two first. And maybe bring a wax paper bag into the booth with me.
Aw, shucks…
It’s all a tough choice, and I sure hope I don’t have to make it either. Like everyone else here it seems, I was an Edwards fan so I’m not getting my first choice anyway.
Since there’s no way you vote for Hil, I take it you understand how someone else might say
“No-way-in-this-lifetime-not-even-after-the-rip-in-the-fabric-of-time am I voting for a ni-ni-ni-ni-newcomer with no experience.” And your decision is based on “bad behavior” from the cu-cu-cu-confused old woman and that makes you right? OK, let’s look at bad behavior. Obama started out by sending a battery of lawyers to the election board at the eleventh hour to kneecap all the other democratic candidates in his first election bid so he could run unopposed, as befits a charismatic messiah. You do understand we are watching a political campaign, not something tame, like legislation or sausage being made. And I know women take too long but again this is not her fault. South Dakota and Montana are doing exactly what the Democratic Party told them to do, vote in June, and Fl-Mi did what their state (Republican) legislatures forced them to do, vote in 1949, or whenever this thing started. Finally, the Lion of the Senate had no problem going to the convention 750 delegates short. But he’s a man and he never did anything bad like get drunk and kill somebody. Oh, wait. Wow,sometimes Democrats do a bad, bad thing and still deserve R-E-S-P-E-C-T. I have to stop now. The hyphen key is broken.
“Hillary Clinton is like a mother standing on a bridge threatening to throw her baby in the river unless she is named Mother of the Year.”
Oooo – got any metaphors for Clinton as a secretary, nurse, French maid, or prostitute? We wouldn’t want to ignore her status as a female, would we?