Army unwilling to spend millions developing
chin-strapless helmets for the chinless

Gun Counter Gomer proves that we are winning that war over there:

If the Iraq War is "lost" as journalists, politicians, and other Democrats continue to shrilly insist, then why is the Iraqi military choosing American weapons? It isn't because American M16s are better than AK-47s for the needs of the Iraqi military (they aren't), but because Iraqis are impressed by American soldiers and want to emulate them. Do you think they would be so eager to adapt(sic) our gear if we were losing? Me neither.

When it is helpfully pointed out that Iraqi soldiers are carrying American weapons because that is what the Americans are giving them, Gomer replies:

There is no doubt at all that they will carry what they are issued (and that decision was ultimately made well above their pay grade, as my link in the article shows), but it is equally true that the Iraqi soldiers want to emulate American soldiers. They covet the M-4 and M-16, want the same sunglasses and goggles, and other American gear.

It is also equally true that they want iPods and Baby Jesus Butt Plugs too, all because we are winning and America is a great country: Democracy! Sexy! Baby Jesus Butt Plugs!

But, now that the conversation has turned to guns, Gomer is unable to use the same self-restraint that kept him from enlisting, and he off he goes:

You do know that the M-4 is a "chopped" M-16, is less functionally reliable than an M-16, and fires 5.56 ammo at much lowers velocities because the barrel length of the M-4 is 5.5 inches shorter, leading to reduced terminal performance?

Nah, of course you didn't.

I bet he is the center of attention at the bi-monthly church strawberry social and ammo sale.