The wolf in hockey mom clothing:
Wildlife activists thought they had seen the worst in 2003 when Frank Murkowski, then the Republican governor of Alaska, signed a bill ramping up state programs to gun down wild wolves from airplanes, inviting average citizens to participate. Wolves, Murkowski believed, were clearly better than humans at killing elk and moose, and humans needed to even the playing field.
But that was before Sarah Palin took Murkowski’s job at the end of 2006. She went one step, or paw, further. Palin didn’t think Alaskans should be allowed to chase wolves from aircraft and shoot them — they should be encouraged to do so. Palin’s administration put a bounty on wolves’ heads, or to be more precise, on their mitts.
In early 2007, Palin’s administration approved an initiative to pay a $150 bounty to hunters who killed a wolf from an airplane in certain areas, hacked off the left foreleg, and brought in the appendage. Ruling that the Palin administration didn’t have the authority to offer payments, a state judge quickly put a halt to them but not to the shooting of wolves from aircraft.
Detractors consider the airborne shootings a savage business, conducted under the euphemism "predator control." The airplanes appear in the winter, so the wolves show up like targets in a video game, sprinting across the white canvas below. Critics believe the practice violates the ethics of hunting, while supporters say the process is not hunting at all, but a deliberate cull.
[...]
Gordon Haber is a wildlife scientist who has studied wolves in Alaska for 43 years. "On wildlife-related issues, whether it is polar bears or predator controls, she has shown no inclination to be objective," he says of Palin. "I cannot find credible scientific data to support their arguments," he adds about the state’s rational for gunning down wolves. "In most cases, there is evidence to the contrary."
Last year, 172 scientists signed a letter to Palin, expressing concern about the lack of science behind the state’s wolf-killing operation. According to the scientists, state officials set population objectives for moose and caribou based on "unattainable, unsustainable historically high populations." As a result, the "inadequately designed predator control programs" threatened the long-term health of both the ungulate and wolf populations. The scientists concluded with a plea to Palin to consider the conservation of wolves and bears "on an equal basis with the goal of producing more ungulates for hunters."
Apparently Palin wasn’t fazed. Earlier this year she introduced state legislation that would further divorce the predator-control program from science. The legislation would transfer authority over the program from the state Department of Fish and Game to Alaska’s Board of Game, whose members are appointed by, well, Palin. Even some hunters were astounded by her power play.
The legislation would give Palin’s board "more leeway without any scientific input to do whatever the hell they basically wanted," Mark Richards, co-chair of Alaska Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, wrote in an e-mail. The legislation is currently stalled in the Alaska state Senate.
People who shoot wolves from airplanes aren’t sportsmen or hunters.
They’re sick fucks.



21 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
In an initial response to the recent outcry, Sarah Palin told the Associated Press that she’d like to use a similar approach to control the ongoing unrest in the American protectorate of Iraq. “While some squirmy liberals might consider it too harsh, I think the idea has merit and adheres to traditional small town values of an-eye-for-an-eye,” she said.
A reward of 2 gallons of oil would be paid to contractors who bring in the left hand of an Iraqi, though only 1 gallon in the case of children under the age of 12. “I know some of those with the traditional loser’s mentality would ask: ‘how would we determine if they were terrorists?’” continued Palin at the press conference, while idling fiddling with the safety on the Sig Sauer in her shoulder holster, “but I honestly feel that’s the kind of unnecessary micro-management of the whole business that has marred our success in Iraq. A dead Iraqi is an Iraqi that’s not giving us bad PR, and that’s a good thing. The Lord guides our way, and whoever he leads us to kill, we kill.”
Ah, Conservative Compassion — The Sequel.
God almighty I hate these fucking people. Death and destruction is all they know.
“People who shoot wolves from airplanes aren’t sportsmen or hunters.” — perhaps not, but according to the latest polls they *do* represent a majority of the American voters. That’s a really, really scary thought. I live in Vermont (where most hunters actually hunt instead of playing at being fighter pilots), and it strikes me that Palin may have been on to a good thing with that whole secession idea… Perhaps Canada will take us on as a refugee state?
All true but the ad is ineffective as for anyone who would care about this Sarah Palin would not have made their short list – neither would McCain.
I disagree. I think some of the women who see her only as a mom would be pretty appalled to find out that she’s also a blood thirsty twit.
I’m honestly not surprised, since she doesn’t let a little thing like “endangered species” get in her way, she certainly wouldn’t even consider anything like that silly “Geneva Convention” (which we’ve been violating for these 6 or 7 years, anyway).
On the plus side, at least Defenders can go all negative and she can’t scream sexism (even though that commercial really upset me). I bet the $400K roll initiative came from lower 48 tax $$$, too.
Let’s examine the carbon footprint of aerial hunting, shall we?
Plus the fact that I don’t think anybody’s chowing down on wolfburgers.
This is quite similar to the way that some folks crossing the country by train in the 19th century used to shoot buffalo from the train windows–not for meat or hide, just for the “fun” of watching them flop over, mortally wounded, or worse yet, not immediately dead.
Sick, sick, sick.
It is not sport to kill from an airplane. It is like calling whaling with grenade tipped harpoons sport fishing.
Without getting too technical, they have no rationale whats over for this either. Wolf populations are self-controlling to food source, so no bullshit about that. And Alaska has no livestock to protect, so the killing is for pleasure. Not sport, not food, not protection, not controlling the population, just the joy of killing things in a defenseless mode.
Well, it’s not like Caribou Barbie and her ilk (elk?) are going to…
“…Alaska has no livestock to protect…” — though, if maverickette Palin had it her way, there’d no doubt be a $200M earmark to set up taxpayer-funded heated ranches on the tundra.
Or designate all herd animals(seals,walrus,caribou,etc)domestic to open up the “opportunity” to slaughter them and their predators.
Just keep those herds of cows bunched up around the pipelines for heat. That’ll make for some long skinny ranches.
That’s why we’re here.
agree TBogg, agree. and have been saying it since she was announced.
I had enough trouble explaining natural predation to my kids – wait till these PTA Moms and Dads have to explain this murderous cruelty to little Kaitlyn or Tyler
15 seconds of these cowards and 15 seconds of a drowning mama polar bear and she is effin’ toast with the on the fence crowd
Word.
My newest bumper sticker, printed with McCain-y color and print, says
SARAH PALIN WANTS POLAR BEARS DEAD
Looks like Mooselini has found a new spokesman.
You’re not paying attention. Who’s speaking out against this? “Mark Richards, co-chair of Alaska Backcountry Hunters and Anglers,” that’s who.
Hunters and anglers are becoming staunch environmentalists these days. The anglers want the water to remain clean, and hunters consider themselves sportsmen, and shooting an animal you don’t intend to eat from a plane is most unsportsmanlike.
I used to think hunting was just barbaric, but then I met some deer hunters. One guy I know was a hunting guide who didn’t shoot deer with a gun, but with a crossbow. Another I know, once he has enough venison to freeze for his extended family for the winter, donates the rest to the Union Mission.
The upshot is that this will turn off a lot more hunters than Kerry’s spanking new Carhart jacket.
Can Obama campaign on removing Alaska’s statehood? Plskthxbai.
(Alaskans, don’t take it personally. Just look at the fucks who hold statewide office, though.)
Well, then I say to restore natural balance and the spirit of true sportsmanship, it’s time to arm the wolves with surface-to-air missles.
After all, there’s a constitutional right to arm bears, which should not be construed narrowly…so wolves get armed too. With SAMs.
In addition, unlike Palin’s flying butt-monkeys, the wolves eat what they kill.
Kind of makes you wish for one of those nature-fights-back-against-the-evil-humans scenarios, doesn’t it?