The other day Daniel Henninger wrote an otherwise worthless column: Will McCain Waste Palin which got me to thinking in ways that probably never occurred to Henninger.
I started thinking about David Clyde.
As they say, lemme ’splain:
Sarah Palin is a woman of modest but unrefined political skills. She gives a good speech, has a definable image, exhibits strong political instincts, is relentlessly opportunistic, and stays on message no matter how stupid it makes her look. Regardless of what you may think, these are desirable qualities when you’re looking for candidates for the highest office(s) in the land. Policy, depth of knowledge, details…that’s for the wonks and political creatures from Chief of Staff on down.
Unfortunately, because the Republican bench was so thin (Lieberman – a putative Democrat, Pawlenty – dull as dirt, Romney – arrogant, rich, flipping-flopping, religious cultist) the powers that be were forced to turn their lonely eyes to Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. It was a desperation move, but they had to put some voters in the voting booth in order to stand a chance this year.
Palin was unvetted, untried in the "outside" world, and has been proven to be unseasoned and overwhelmed by the media spotlight. Although she carries a lot of baggage from Alaska, compared to what we’re used to, it’s pretty small potatoes; unfortunately at this juncture of the game so is she. With a bit work, some judicious covering-up and paying off, and a few years in the minors that is Alaskan politics, she could have been a perfectly viable candidate… in 2012. But the presidential election is this year and so they called her up and crossed their fingers hoping for luck and a few breaks along the way. Now it looks like they’re burning up her political future and, after all of the hits she’s been taking, I don’t think she’s ever going to get a call back for an encore.
(For the record, I truly believe that her political worm turned the moment that Tine Fey said, "I can see Russia from my house." I can’t tell you how many times that often replayed snip gets brought up when discussing Palin.)
Which brings us to the story of David Clyde:
DAVID CLYDE COULD HAVE been a more sympathetic figure. Instead, he became an example of what can happen to the potential of a young baseball player when the men with the money force unrealistic expectations on his arm.
Bob Short owned the Texas Rangers in 1973. The team was a flop in the Lone Star State two years after moving from Washington D.C. The Rangers had failed to attract more than 9,000 to a game all season.
That June, the franchise used its No. 1 overall pick in the amateur draft on Clyde, an 18-year-old Texas phenom with a sizzling fastball and name recognition.
[...]
Short saw an opportunity to stir interest in his foundering franchise by throwing Clyde into the Rangers’ starting rotation. It worked perfectly.
The excitement the homegrown prospect generated led to the first sellout ever at Arlington Stadium. Clyde was on the mound in a Rangers uniform June 27, 1973, in front of a crowd of 35,698 only 20 days after pitching Westchester High School to the state finals.
"The correlation I felt was like going from high school to performing open-heart surgery," Clyde once said. "I felt that’s how much better I had to be."
[...]
In his final high school season, Clyde nearly had been unhittable. He went 18-0, allowing three earned runs in 148 innings. Most people conveniently forgot that those numbers were registered against skinny teen-agers, not seasoned major league hitters. A lot was expected, no matter how unrealistic those expectations were.
Clyde walked the first two Minnesota batters he faced that day before blowing away Bob Darwin, George Mitterwald and Joe Lis on swinging third strikes to end his first inning in the big leagues. The crowd gave him a standing ovation, and he earned the win in five innings of work.
Clyde might have become a legend if his story didn’t take a downturn from there. His brightest moment in the major leagues was his first. He completed his rookie season with a 4-8 record and a 5.01 earned-run average.
His professional career lasted nine years, but only five in the big leagues. He compiled an 18-33 record in 84 starts with the Rangers and Cleveland and a 4.63 ERA. When he retired from the Houston Astros’ farm system in 1981, he was less than a season of big-league service away from qualifying for a baseball pension.
Toby Harrah, a 17-year major league veteran, played shortstop for the Rangers when Clyde arrived. Harrah believes it wasn’t a very smart idea, but Clyde helped direct himself toward failure by hooking up with veterans who liked to party and weren’t interested in protecting a kid from himself.
"To be honest with you, I don’t think he handled it very well," Harrah said.
"The fact is, he shouldn’t have been there, but the Rangers at that time were trying to get people to come to the ballpark. He had a great arm. It was unfortunate that he didn’t pitch longer in the big leagues than he did."
The only difference between Sarah Palin and David Clyde is that she throws from the right. He came from the left.
You can look it up.
Login Here





21 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
If Palin-McCain loses this time around [and I fervently hope they will], I think we’re still fated to see Palin on the Republican ticket in 2012. In the meantime she’ll raise lots of money for them, and keep spouting her brainless drivel — just what Republicans like.
I’m not so sure. Like Rudy “9/11″ Guilani, the more people see of her the greater their dislike. She is a draw with the lunatic fundies because she is one of them, but if the Rethugs learn nothing else from being crushed in 2006 and (hopefully) 2008 it will be that their “religious base” isn’t enough for building a national campaign.
Then again, maybe they won’t learn. “Good news, everyone!”
Great one TBogg, thanks.
I thought you were going to end the story with:
The only difference between Sarah Palin and David Clyde: lipstick.
Unless lipstick was part of Clyde’s wild streak.
Four years of opposition defining as a crackpot cultist will minimize her chances. She may be a leader of the religious right, but without the newness, she’ll get shellacked. Especially if its Obama running for second term.
I think there’s a very good chance of that. I know all of the arguments against it, but then I think “Nixon, Reagan…”and know that, in the land of the Republican true believers, all things are possible.
I think failure was built right in. She’s a woman, and her failure will give conservatives and big business all the excuses they need to refuse to treat women equally, to refuse to promote them, to refer to them as affirmative action hires. Considering the twenty three cents an hour they’re saving and the boost in get-back-in-the-kitchen, countrywrecker animosity, that may be worth the trade off.
Even the republicans know we’re destined for a big pile of shit for the next four years. Why not let a democrat take the blame? And with global warming becoming a problem even they can’t quite ignore, why not let the democrats solve it while they get to sit back and make nasty cracks about throwing money at a problem that doesn’t exist? Best of both worlds: you still get to live beachfront, and you also get to pretend you were right all along.
I think they’ve been willing to throw this one. McCain/Palin? I mean, really? Only problem is, they’ve stolen so many votes in the last nine years that I’m not sure they’re even capable of losing it.
I was thinking the same thing. That or McThuselah was throwing it to get back at the party for ignoring him in 2000 when he coulda been a contendah . . .
Still, throwing it, along with the pasting they may take in Congress, seems out of character. It might be that their bench is so weak they ran out of options (run Cheney at the top of the ticket? Yikes!).
Talk about the way back machine!! What’s next, Mark “The Bird” Fidrych?
Like these a**clowns need an excuse? Between Nancy Pfwhatever touting domestic violence as a “culture of intimacy,” Terry Schiavo as the wingnut poster child for “disability rights,” and women like Hilary Clinton and Michelle Obama held out as the twin distaff antichrists of the new milenium, they have more than enough excuses not to promote women.
They’re not in this to lose. As soon as the votes are counted, something legally unpleasant will develop in “Troopergate,” Palin and the First Dood will be exiled to American Siberia, and a new VP will be appointed. Just pray that they don’t find a loophole in the Constitution that will let them appoint Cheney.
I think I’m watching a different election than most folks.
I’ve been watching John McCain and/or his campaign make daily gaffes and major mistakes in strategy and tactics.
They are going to continue fucking themselves, by all signs.
Sarah Palin is in the process of becoming a national laughingstock.
It’s not a question of her ever being elected to national office — will she be able to finish her one term as governor of Alaska?
Palin didn’t seek to reform the cronyism and corruption of Alaska politics, she sought to replace the “old boys network” with her own corrupt network.
Goobers, anyone?
You can look it up.
… and now I have an irresistable urge to watch bull durham … if only for the quote “you couldn’t hit water if you fell out of a fucking boat”
thanks T!
gordonsowner:
Isn’t lipstick on pitchers banned in baseball, along the same line as spitballs?
I, for one, am looking forward to a VP that really has hunting skill and experience. They won’t be shooting lawyers in the face by accident, that’s for sure. AND field-dress them afterwards. When is her hunting date with Fat Tony, by the way?
I think this long piece at Making Light ties a lot of interesting tidbits together.
If only we had some kind of vehicle to verify and publicize this stuff. I’m thinking of something on an easily handled, inexpensive material, like paper, and you could print this stuff up and sell it, maybe have some advertising, some late night sports score, movie reviews. But the other stuff — call it “news” — on the paper thingie would have to well-researched, well-written, and in the public interest. Maybe they could do the same thing on TV or radio.
Deep back in my mind, I’m thinking that McCain has known all along that he was going to lose, and he’s determined to flame out and take the religious right with him. I see him grabbing them all in his hands and laughing maniacally, “I’ve survived five plane crashes — how many have you? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!!”
Just a little notion that keeps tugging at me…
The problem is that even if McCain had the decency to harbor such fantasies of revenge, the religious right are too oblivious to see this. They’d vote for a trained chimp wearing a cross. (Come to think of it, they sorta did!) The people who would ultimately be screwed are the rest of us; because McCain forgot that the trained chimp’s handlers gave Diebold the contract for the voting machines.
or Steve Dalkowski, the player on whom Nuke Laloosh is based. Million dollar arm (maybe the fastest throwing pitcher ever), not even a 10 cent head. In his minor league career he pitched 995 innings, striking out 1396 and walking 1354. He evidently doesn’t remember much since the 1960s due to alcohol induced dementia. In his first minor league year, Dalkowski had a game he lost 8-4 in which he struck out 24, walked 18, hit 4 batters and threw 6 wild pitches.
Burt Blyleven started his first major league game at age 19, and went on to pitch for another 20+ years. He’s got *two* World Series rings on his fingers. Sometimes these teenage wonders work out.
Of course, Blyleven is smart – smarter than Clyde, Dalkoswki, Laloosh and Palin put together, which is pretty amazing for a ball player.
TBogg:
Great Post. This is why I return again and again to your site. On point comentary, I learn something new, you make me laugh, and you have improved my horizions for new music (new to me)
Thanks agian.
Eric in Austin
my response is baseballian: Clyde’s numbers and lefthandedness now would earn him a minimum 10-year stay in the major leagues and many tens of millions of worthless American dollars.
And as a historical note Charlie Finley did nearly exactly the same thing to Mike Morgan just a few years after Clyde’s debut and during Clyde’s flameout. He started Morgan straight out of a Las Vegas high school and after a solid debut for the Oakland A’s — before several thousands of extra fans — started Morgan against the same team in his second game, which defined both stupid baseball and Finley greed because you just don’t want to do that with any young pitcher who’s just come up, and he was “raked” as the baseball cognoscenti like to say. He was in the minors before long and it is to Morgan’s credit that he salvaged a relatively long-lived major league career, if a much more mediocre one than he might have had had he been nurtured instead of exploited.
Bert would be in the hall of fame, if he didn’t play for sucky teams.
Check the stat page:
http://www.baseball-reference……be01.shtml
Look at the “similar pitchers” catergory near the bottom on the left. Eight of ten are already in the hall.