<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Political Purity Ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/</link>
	<description>&#34;...a somewhat popular blogger&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:20:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DarkAvenger</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17923</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkAvenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17923</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The latter part of my post was written by Mr. Frazier, I don’t know who wrote the first part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A tip of the DA hat to both authors, and please don’t sue me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latter part of my post was written by Mr. Frazier, I don’t know who wrote the first part.</p>
<p>A tip of the DA hat to both authors, and please don’t sue me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlipYrWhig</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17922</link>
		<dc:creator>FlipYrWhig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17922</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re: her “regulator” credentials, IIRC she was appointed to a state oversight board for natural resources, during which time she called out its chair (also the head of the Alaska GOP) for conducting party business on government time.  It was the move that originally established her maverickaliciousness.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: her “regulator” credentials, IIRC she was appointed to a state oversight board for natural resources, during which time she called out its chair (also the head of the Alaska GOP) for conducting party business on government time.  It was the move that originally established her maverickaliciousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17920</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17920</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The above item @ 5 seems to be an almost verbatim copy of “Coyote v. Acme” by Ian Frazier, which was published in the New Yorker magazine on 2/26/90, pages 42-43.  However, no attribution has been given to Mr. Frazier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since we have no idea who–if anyone–actually has rights to this work,&lt;br /&gt;
we hope that this acknowledgement will suffice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above item @ 5 seems to be an almost verbatim copy of “Coyote v. Acme” by Ian Frazier, which was published in the New Yorker magazine on 2/26/90, pages 42-43.  However, no attribution has been given to Mr. Frazier.</p>
<p>Since we have no idea who–if anyone–actually has rights to this work,<br />
we hope that this acknowledgement will suffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLinGA</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17914</link>
		<dc:creator>TLinGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17914</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe someone should remind her of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Edwards v. Aguillard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, the case that ruled teaching creationism in public schools as unconstitutional.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe someone should remind her of <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard" rel="nofollow">Edwards v. Aguillard</a></em>, the case that ruled teaching creationism in public schools as unconstitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoozer</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17907</link>
		<dc:creator>snoozer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17907</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The comparisons to previously underestimated politicians are lame.  To be honest, I don’t remember their campaigns, but if Reagan and Clinton were underestimated at first, they surely *changed* people’s estimations of them by demonstrating knowledge, judgment, and poise.  If Palin’s been underestimated, then the burden is on her to change our minds, not on us to take McCain’s word for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comparisons to previously underestimated politicians are lame.  To be honest, I don’t remember their campaigns, but if Reagan and Clinton were underestimated at first, they surely *changed* people’s estimations of them by demonstrating knowledge, judgment, and poise.  If Palin’s been underestimated, then the burden is on her to change our minds, not on us to take McCain’s word for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cellar47</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17906</link>
		<dc:creator>Cellar47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17906</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to mention &lt;em&gt;Frankenstein vs. The Wolfman&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention <em>Frankenstein vs. The Wolfman</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BaxterJ</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17904</link>
		<dc:creator>BaxterJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17904</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;McCain/Palin: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.entertonement.com/collections/4359/McCain-And-Palin-Answer-Questions-Together&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Massive fail&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain/Palin: <a href="http://www.entertonement.com/collections/4359/McCain-And-Palin-Answer-Questions-Together" rel="nofollow">Massive fail</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snoozer</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17903</link>
		<dc:creator>snoozer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17903</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven’t noticed the repulsion, but I noticed she wore a high collar this time instead of the open neck she wore last time.  Not wanting to show too much skin to the old man?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, it might be deliberately exaggerated modesty.  This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/us/politics/09etiquette.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NY Times article&lt;/a&gt; discusses politicians’ personal boundaries vis-a-vis hugs and such.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven’t noticed the repulsion, but I noticed she wore a high collar this time instead of the open neck she wore last time.  Not wanting to show too much skin to the old man?</p>
<p>On the other hand, it might be deliberately exaggerated modesty.  This <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/us/politics/09etiquette.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">NY Times article</a> discusses politicians’ personal boundaries vis-a-vis hugs and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dosido</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17900</link>
		<dc:creator>dosido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s funny that Palin gets in so much trouble for doing what McCain does and that is to steal Obama’s talking points.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s funny that Palin gets in so much trouble for doing what McCain does and that is to steal Obama’s talking points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badwater</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-17899</link>
		<dc:creator>Badwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2008/09/29/the-political-purity-ball/#comment-17899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Let’s not forget “Captain Beefheart vs. the Grunt People”&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s not forget “Captain Beefheart vs. the Grunt People”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
