Comments on: Neolojism

By: TheCritic

TheCritic — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:50:21 +0000

dude, totally own that title. that shit is teh awesome times ten. i’m always on the look out for a good neologism myself, but that is one of the finer enjambments it has been my blogger reading experiences to witness. honestly worthy of joyce, had he been a cranky early 21st c. blogger. hell, that shit might even be in finnegans wake.

By: moeman

moeman — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:16:28 +0000

Best FDL thread title ever.

FWIW, I saw starbursts when I read it.

By: captphealy

captphealy — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:20:47 +0000

I gotta hand it to ya, that title has a lot of spunk…

By: dstatton

dstatton — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:10:45 +0000

I’ve agreed with Ann Coulter exactly twice: when she said that undecided voters in 2000 were stupid, and when she called Lowry a girly man.

By: smilingdog

smilingdog — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:49:42 +0000

I was about to correct the spelling of your title, but finally caught on. Very clever…

By: abogato

abogato — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:13:49 +0000

That’s why we keep coming back.

*cough*

By: OccamsAftershave

OccamsAftershave — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:52:29 +0000

Best. Blog Title. Ever.
Please keep us aware of Starburst Lowery’s ejaculations, a truly semenal conservative thinker who beats to the tune of his own dram-a. However premature his gushing over Sarah, he is capable of maintaining his rhapsody for years, as his principled priapism under Reagan proved.

By: Ruthie

Ruthie — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:45:47 +0000

Ever since McCain chose Palin as his nominee for VP, the National Review has become a veritable political pornucopia.

By: dowah

dowah — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:30:40 +0000

I believe the title is one!

By: moondancer

moondancer — Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:00:47 +0000

We’re all too good for this. We need better enemies. I’m not bragging, they’re just too stupid and lack basic self awareness to play in this game. VonZep’s right, wicked title TB.