Sorry, but this one is going to leave a mark:
The Republican National Committee appears to have spent more than $150,000 to clothe and accessorize vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her family since her surprise pick by John McCain in late August.
According to financial disclosure records, the accessorizing began in early September and included bills from Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York for a combined $49,425.74.
The records also document a couple of big-time shopping trips to Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, including one $75,062.63 spree in early September.
The RNC also spent $4,716.49 on hair and makeup through September after reporting no such costs in August.
Politico asked the McCain campaign for comment, explicitly noting the $150,000 in expenses for department store shopping and makeup consultation that were incurred immediately after Palin’s announcement. Pre-September reports do not include similar costs.
Spokeswoman Maria Comella declined to answer specific questions about the expenditures, including whether it was necessary to spend that much and whether it amounted to one early investment in Palin or if shopping for the vice presidential nominee was ongoing.
You have to hand it to her, she’s nothing if not opportunistic.
It seems like public service is just one big perkfest for the Palin family; flying the family hither and yon at taxpayer expense. Now the wardrobe and the styling. Take away the nice hotels, the room service, the sycophantic staffers picking up her venti skinny white mocha [no whip], the crowds, the adulation from the Boner-Americans…
It’s going to be a long cold winter back in Wasilla.
Login Here





11 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
And then there’s this case of putting
lipstick on a pigmakeup on an old fart.Now that Palin has gotten a big whiff of attention, the rest of her life will be one prolonged anticlimax. Good.
Nah, she ain’t going back. She’ll be on Faux News with her own show in a heartbeat. She needs the attention and like Huckabee, when she finds out how much better the pay is in TV than politics she’ll flip in a heartbeat.
I’m sure she’ll be thrilled to know that she has to pay taxes on those clothes.
I agree with the moistenedbink: after realization that the party machine was using her for the moment and now just really wants to take a shower while she leave with the shiny things, she’ll continue her vocation, this time as a media whore.
Yep, and you know that Mr. Ailes (the bad one) is simply salivating at the thought.
Hmm, I bet O’Reilly is too, what with his needing some new babe-blood around the set to keep the, uh, outrage as, uh, firm as usual.
“…she’ll continue her vocation, this time as a media whore.”
Even if the IRS recognizes this as an official job category, I still doubt she’ll be able to write off the clothes as a “uniform” expense. The IRC case law to date militates against this.
I really wonder if she has a future even as a Faux News spokesdroid, given that everyone knows how easy it is to screw with her by not sticking to her script. No, I think that Garrison Keillor got it right: big book advance from Regnery and speeches for $40K a pop.
I agree. Especially if Palin intends to run for office again in 2012 – she’ll have to finish out her governor term in AK, and that doesn’t leave a lot of time for being a Faux news regular anchor/contributor. Nor does being a Fox Anchor Babe enhance her “seriousness” and “credibility” for future office.
I can see her going the Fox News route in 2013 though.
.
According to a reliable source, by which I mean my wife, a Republican spokesperson said the clothes would be “donated to charity” after the election. This likely means auctioning them off. I imagine Rich Lowry would fork over quite a sum for her debate getup. [I disclaim all responsibility for any mental images this causes you and will not offer compensation for any brain bleach expenses incurred.]
she’s nothing if not opportunistic
Like an infection.