Let me put on my bitch shoes…
In my long and varied professional career (I do have a day job) I spent many years in the catalog business involved in every facet from product selection, design (in terms of catalog layout as well as actual apparel design), copy writing, to pinning and clipping clothing on the backside so the camera-side looked correct. During those years I spent more time than I want to remember on photo shoots working with models, photographers, make-up people, dressers, caterers, and all the other assorted riff-raff who spend hours setting up shots that are over in ten minutes or so.
Following each shoot we would spend days poring over contact sheets or light tables trying to find the one perfect shot (or closest to it) out of sometimes hundreds of each product. I still have the loupe (and now poor eyesight) to prove it. While Photoshop is our friend, you can’t always save an otherwise great shot when one of the models eyes appears droopy or they pose with one hand inadvertently giving the finger.
We didn’t catch that one until too late.
Having said all of that, I am appalled by the Pretty In Mink glamour shots.
Honestly, I’m not offended by the use of fur so much as the sheer crapitude of the make-up artistry and photography. Don’t even get me started on the poses. I realize you have to photograph the conservative women you have, not the conservative women you wish you had, but Sweet f/Stop Jesus, these are just awful. They could have improved the quality and saved some money by having the make-up done for free at a MAC store and then wandered down the mall to a Glamour Shots. Worst of all is realizing that these were the best of the best.
To be fair there are a few good shots as evidenced by the fact that Ann Coulter came in third in our Guess the Transvestite! poll. A glass half-full moment if there ever was one…





73 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Proving once again that TBogg is a Demonic Conservative Ridicule Machine.
Wow, that James Wolcott [Vanity Fair] is fast. He’s got a link to this in this blog. Congrats.
I am assuming the tattoo in the above photo either led to a lawsuit or a suicide. “I wuz drunk so I got me a tattoo of yew, hunny. Ain’t it grate?’
ew
Gah!
I’m mildly curious to know the backstory to this feature.
The Salvation Army banner ad running underneath is a nice touch.
PS – Damn. That Sallie Army ad isn’t there anymore.
PPS – Koch Photo sure cocked this job, didn’t they?
PPPS – Did I miss K-Lo?
I never realized there were so many conservative transsexuals.
Liberalism fails again, this time with the liberal use if the adjective “pretty.”
But you do have to admire the photographer’s “dead animals, dead eyes” approach.
Oh thank you thank you thank you.
What a way to start the day, drinking coffee and laughing my ass off. I’ll try to decide on my favorite but I’m tending toward Mary Katherine Hamm but the notion that Sandy Liddy Bourne is wearing sheared beaver is just too creepy for words.
The only thing that would make these worse is if turkeys were being offed in the background. Or mink.
What a sheltered life I lead. Until I saw the shot of the Lovely But Slightly Cross-eyed Mary Katherine Ham, I didn’t even know that mink came in green.
Oh, and TBogg, regarding your many years in catalog production: my grandpa asked me to thank you for the girdle ads on page 287 of the 1934 Sears Roebuck. Hubba hubba!
So where is PETA when they needed??
They’s all pigs. Not even on my worst Sunday morning at 1:55 AM on a shaky stool in Dirty Frank’s.
If I hadn’t read your post I would have assumed those were shots of student mortician’s make-up class. Not that there is much to work with. And why the slight to K-Lo? Wrap that thang in fur, daddy!
Maybe I’m missing something obvious here but, uh, why is this photographic abortion on the ABCNews website?
I think a few are from Madame Tussauds Wax Museum.
As a former corporate trainer for Glamour Shots and a competitor, I can confirm tbogg’s argument that GS would have done a far better job. The lighting set-up for the Coulter & Co.’s pix is about as unflattering as one can conceive, the hand poses are fucked, the models are all posed like they have scoliosis, and yes, the make-up is lame as well. They all remind me of the traveling outfits that used our name, which would set-up for an afternoon in a low-end salon using one drape of ugly fabric as a backdrop and a photographer who last worked at the DMV.
Hopefully, the bailout of Citi will rectify all the aesthetic issues. But nothing will ever make any of these women sexy. Talk about yer shrinkage.
It looks like an online cheesy escort photo display.
Skagarama.
-G
That was certainly a gallery of crapitude. Was the intent to render the viewer to be unable to masturbate? That sounds just like those evil conservatives.
You’re supposed to guess which one of them was actually dead when photographed.
My favorite was the woman who was head of the Virginia GOP until 2006. I guess successful job performance is not something they were looking for in a conservative woman.
Whoever that Sandy Liddy Bourne is, the makeup job makes her look like Mamie Eisenhower. A conservative lady, yes, but probably not the look they were going for.
Soap opera sets are lit more subtly, and I’ve seen better make up jobs at the Miss Wasilla pageant.
why is this photographic abortion on the ABCNews website?
The whole point is to piss off liberals. Liberals don’t like fur, apparently. Because we’re all hand-in-hand with PETA. Liberals also don’t like Wal-mart, which is where those photos were taken.
“It looks like an online cheesy escort photo display.” — yep, that was my first thought, too. Like, there should be a price tag under each with an hourly/day rate and which services are offered.
The spectacularly crappy quality makes me wonder if this isn’t one of those nefarious slime machine jobs that we lefties are so good at (not!) — as in: Koch Photo is secretly a socialist front organization, and the production team went out of their way to create this study in rigor mortis to embarrass the rightard ladies?
Nah… I just think there’s some justice in the world: their ugly looks match their ugly thoughts and depraved sense of morality.
I didn’t make it past the “queen of polling, Kelly Anne Conway.”
Shout-out to Dirty Frank’s! (Though you coulda avoided calling them “pigs.”) Impressively bad, in so very many dimensions–let’s put it this way: if they were all lefties with whose politics I agreed, I would still find the photos heinous. That it makes a bunch of people with whose politics I profoundly disagree look bad, well, all the better.
Are the coats for sale or the women? I can’t see enough of the coats to make a judgement.
Ahem. They’re pigs. RU visually impaired?
were they all sharing the same lipstick ?
and the lighting is horrible. blown-out highlight all over their skin ? come on.
…and the writing is no better than the photography. Read closely…
Pretty in Mink: Conservative Leading Ladies
A regular on the Fox News Channel’s O’Reilly Factor, Mary Katharine Ham is the online editor of The Washington Examiner. Formerly the managing editor of Townhall.com, O’Reilly is wearing a green three-quarter length sheared mink coat with laser grooving from Miller’s Furs.
(Courtesy 2008 Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute/Photography by KochFoto)
No, I don’t want to think about it.
Are they suggesting she wants to be Mrs. O’Reilly?
That would be some laser grooving.
I missed it by THAT much.
Wow, I haven’t seen jawlines like those since I stopped reading my kid his Superman comics. Seriously, why is it that conservative women have jawlines like male comic book heroes and conservative men’s chins are hidden under layers of subcutaneous fat? And why do all conservatives treat hair as if it were the unruly proletariat that has to be coerced into conformity?
Why are conservatives hair fascists?
Why?
The written descriptions of their conservative creds are pretty hilarious too. Speaking of comic book looks….it’s comic book narrative as well!
speaking of trannyannie…. oops, or not speaking as the case may be…via jezebel:
In what has to be the most delicious Schadenfreude-y news of this entire Thanksgiving week, the New York Post is reporting that Ann Coulter broke her jaw recently and has had it wired shut. “Turkey In The Straw” is likely to have a new meaning for her on Thursday. [NY Post, YouTube]
Never mind your pigs and pit bulls–the “new hotness” is, apparently, putting lipstick on a hatchet.
Whoever that Sandy Liddy Bourne is, the makeup job makes her look like Mamie Eisenhower.
Mamie now, or Mamie back in the 50s?
At least all the makeup, airbrushing and so forth spared us having to see what they really look like, and I suspect that is a real blessing.
My favorite is Sandy Liddy Bourne because nothing says heartland like wearing a sheared beaver (and a) three-quarter length jacket with lynx trim [fixed].
Oh, and Ms. Malkin looks like she’s ready to make her debut at the Club BBoss in Hong Kong.
Personally, I think they should have waited until Coulter had her jaw wired shut. That would have improved her picture immensely.
Come to think of it, all of ‘em could use that improvement. And you wouldn’t even have to take their pictures.
This has got to be a promotion for eHarmony.
Did you scroll all the way to Conservativette #12? They had to exhume Claire Booth Luce to make it an even dozen.
Call me a cynic, but what do you suppose the odds are that Annie, being paranoid about aging gracelessly, had her mouth wired shut in order to lose ten pounds?
(Weight loss estimate based on personal experience with a broken jaw…)
Mother of God, isn’t Ann Coulter sooooooo 2000? Does anyone really care what this vicious old crone thinks? (Sigh) I guess the Olin Foundation, Richard Mellon Scaife and the usual big bucks rightwing loonies will buy enough of these bookstops to vault her latest crap onto the best-seller lists.
An exact transcription of my thoughts as I clicked on the link:
“TBogg’s being way too bitchy here. I’m sure it’s not great, but really, how bad could it HOLY MOTHER OF CHRIST!”
What’s the matter, Barbara Bush wasn’t available?
Please, allow me to say:
Those backgrounds really sucked!!!
Thank you.
Damn, I wish I had not followed that link!!
I just ate and now I’m gonna waste all that food.
Coulter broke her jaw? Wow, I wouldn’t have thought she’d have to open her mouth that wide to do Dick Cheney…
Cheney donkey punched her while she was wetting down a stone dildo?
Not only is it a photographic abortion, it is also a commercial for “Miller’s Furs”. News?
Of course, the Amanda Carpenter blurb reads “Now a national reporter for Townhall.com…”. Clownhall has reporting? Who knew?
Even in haiku,
I’m at a loss to go past
O M Fucking G!
Those mannequins are so life-like!
I recognize Coulter, Malkin and Luce, but who the fuck are the other nine?
Back to the Fifties, when men were men and women were… supposed to look like mannequins at a discount department store. The guys who set up these shots spent too much time during their formative years hiding in closets, jerking off to their mommy’s faded snapshots. Even the most dedicated leftwing pranksters couldn’t achieve this level of Norman Bates “glamour”; the psychotic sincerity leaks off every page!
Did I really need to know that Sandy Liddy Bourne is wearing a “shaved beaver”?
They might have used this service, I originally saw advertised on a TBOGG sidebar (honest!)
http://pageantphotoretouching……uch4a.html
Or maybe they should have….
I believe the Ann Coulter injury occurred when she unhinged her jaw to swallow whole a child, but the tyke proved a little tough to get down.
Now that these conservative “beauties” have done the fur fetish thing, what’s next in their childish attempts to piss off liberals? Maybe a “girls with guns” motif?
I didn’t see a credit for him over there but I’m pretty sure this is proof that Chris Muir was involved in this project.
My grandmother is a conservative fur freak. She had about a dozen. Nice ones–the sort that could survive ten-year-olds with overactive imaginations. And I can remember spending afternoons shut in her attic cedar closet–so I wouldn’t get in trouble–dressing up in them. (The closet was virtually soundproof.) Since I now belong to a marketing demographic to whom furriers are aggressively trying to sell their products, perhaps they would value my input:
1. Ann Coulter: Doesn’t the pose just bring back memories of those X-mas angel statuettes, presumably praying to Jeebus for snow and a sh*tload of presents? Proof that plastic is so last year…. Let’s see, Rule #1 in marketing class was never let anyone touch the product in an ad if their hands aren’t perfect. Ann Coulter bites her nails. For $25 and tip, she could have gotten a manicure and a decent set of fakes applied by some of the “more deserving” illegal aliens near her. Whore red nail polish would be appropriate.
2. Malkin: What exactly is for sale in this picture? You can almost see the sheared mink. (Crappy-looking pelts by the way.) And if they’re going to emphasize cleavage, it would be nice if the model had some. The least they could have done is spring for a Wonderbra.
3. Kellyanne Conway: OH. MY. GOD…. Is she on drugs or just hung over? THE BLACK GUY WON HONEY! GET OVER IT! And the coat is sucky.
4. Star Parker: God bless “St. Ronnie.” She’s proof that “welfare queens” are alive and well. While the product shot looks better than most, it would have looked even better if she had worn a dress in a contrasting color. Opening her eyes would have been a plus.
5. Susan Phalen: Another crappy coat. I know what fox fur looks like. And having worn a fox stole wrapped around my little head so that the tiny clippy-thing inside its preserved mouth was biting its tail, I think it’s safe to say I am intimately familiar with the texture of fox fur. Since when did fox fur look like someone skinned a dead dog? Light in the photo is way too harsh.
6. Nonie Darwish: Abayahs now come in sheared mink! But seriously…. Why are these manufacturers trying to sell iconography as glamour, when their market is allegedly “real [conservative] people?” With a little more attention to hair, make-up and lighting this could have been a great “real person” shot.
7. Mary Katherine Ham: Somewhere a hotel in Vegas is missing its bathtowels–and a hooker!
8. Amanda Carpenter: Another shot where you aren’t exactly sure what’s being sold. The crappy lighting on the ill-fitting dress reveals that it’s most likely a synthetic blend dyed with potassium chromate. The mink also looks like it has been dyed with a synthetic–which is another reason it has an otherworldly sheen. Seriously people; the Wal-Marting of American conumption is over. Even rich old farts aren’t going to pay top dollar anymore for crap.
9. Sandy Liddy Bourne: This is probably one of the better shots. Beaver is a great fur–warmer and softer than mink. It was more popular back in the 40’s and 50’s. Nice coat although I personally prefer the natural dark brown shades. I would have used “product” and a curling iron to give her hair a bit more of a period look.
10. Kate Obershain: Who did her effin’ hair? Who did the effin’ lighting?! She might as well be draped in a bath towel.
11. Grossman: Dramatic coat. Too bad we can’t really see it against the backdrop. Her lipstick color also gets lost against the background.
12. Claire: What can I say? Legends don’t need no stinkin’ furs to look good! Nice gray tones in the B&W.
But what do I know; I am NOT a marketing professional.
With apologies to Major League:
Photographer #1: I never heard of half of these chicks, and the ones I have heard of are way past their prime.
Photographer #2: Most of these chicks never had a prime.
P1: This chick here is dead!
Editor: Cross her off then! Oh, wait. There’s nobody else but a lady who died over 20 years ago and all we have is a black-and-white? Really? Oh, well. Better go with it anyway. Not like wingnut fanboys need all that much…
I’ve decided Coulter’s pose has to be a deliberate reference to those rumors. Why else would someone who claims to be upset by “those rumors” choose a pose that emphasizes a masculine jawline, manly chin & prominent adam’s apple? Candis Cayne in Dirty Sexy Money looks dainty by comparison, and Cayne’s character was supposed to be a joke!
Their faces match their souls.
The Nazgul…
Does anyone remember the Blackglama ads? They made Lillian Hellman look more glamorous than this lot.
Lillian Hellman!
I realize you have to photograph the conservative women you have, not the conservative women you wish you had.
Best line evah! I dare say you should be writing for Fugly.com and I wish to God that site would take these photos on!
(Lord preserve us from any Rich Lowry commentary!)
P.S. Whoever had the editing job must have broken his airbrush tool. Holy Christ…
what is the opposite of priapism? whatever it is now i have it.
Weenieshrinkage.
Is this another example of conservative spite politics? It has to be real fur, right?
Anyhow, where the hell is Margaret Spellings???
aha! So, you were the one responsible for the 1975 Sears Catalog, page 176, the male underwear model showing, um, dangly bits below his boxers!!
Snopes shows a picture that’s all fuzzy. In the catalog, there is no doubt what it is.
Thank you, from the bottom of my…heart.
GOP SOP at this point: call it “Pretty in Mink”, and not even “mink” is accurate.
I say in retaliation we do a “dyed-in-the-wool progressive” calendar, and have Al Gore etc in old-fashioned woolen underwear, the kind with the trapdoor in the back, in red, but have them wearing top hats and monocles.
It would be every bit as sensible, topical, and hip as the “Pretty in Mink” calendar – and it would give conservatives something to scream about for the holiday season!
phone sex
phone sex
phone sex
phone sex
phone sex
lol