Rictus or jizz in my pants? You make the call…
Over at Peejay Media, Bernard Chapin, who writes like this:
Profound trepidation mars a conservative’s interpretation of recent events.
and
In terms of erudition and perspicacity, Dr. Theodore Dalrymple is one of the most accomplished conservatives in the world.
…but talks like this, interviews the above mentioned Dr. Theodore Dalrymple (who is actually Anthony (A.M.) Daniels, an anti-MultiCulti Warrior from ye Olde Englande) about why the white man’s burden is getting more burden-ier (short answer: blame it on wogs and drugs and rock and roll).
Toward the end of the interview comes this interesting exchange:
BC: In your essay, “The Roads to Serfdom,” you refer to a famous quote by George Bernard Shaw, who said, “We are all socialists now.” Are we all on the brink of becoming socialists once again? Why do you think, given the oppressive and pernicious nature of this method of governance, it remains politically viable?
Dr. Dalrymple: I think it more likely that there will be an increase in corporatism than in socialism. America will not be socialist, but it might be corporatist (there is always a tendency to this deformation in modern societies). You will find an increase in public spending with an increase in contracts given to businessmen with political contacts or who are politically pliable. Mr. Obama strikes me as a Blair figure rather than, say, a Leninist. This will lead to a swamp of corruption very difficult to eradicate because it will be legalized corruption, which is very hard to eliminate once started. An important thing to look for will be the corruption of statistics; for once they are corrupted, no one can know what is going on in the larger picture, and this gives carte blanche for the looting of the public purse by private interests linked to politicians, all in the name of procuring benefits for the public.
Tonight at Number One Observatory Circle, Dick Cheney got a boner knowing that the last eight years will not have been in vain and that his hard work will be carried on.
U-$-A! U-$-A! U-$-A!
Login Here




12 Comments
Spotlight


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
Advanced search
RSS/XML Feed
“You will find an increase in public spending with an increase in contracts given to businessmen with political contacts or who are politically pliable. Mr. Obama … will lead to a swamp of corruption very difficult to eradicate because it will be legalized corruption, which is very hard to eliminate once started. “
I tried to come up with a clever response, but the back-ass-waditude of this is so strong that it cancels any cleverness completely.
An important thing to look for will be the corruption of statistics; for once they are corrupted, no one can know what is going on in the larger picture
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL…
Tell me ain’t so. Honest. Can they do such mental feats of perverse machinations? Lie with statistics? No ma. Don’t let ‘em do it. We’re pure. We’re clean. How we going to keep our actuaries and demographers and pollsters from howling at the moon with laconic remorse and self-loathing inflicted upon them by Massah Overlord. We ain’t going to be able to talk about the weather or the culture no mo. Not now that they’ve takin’ our data and number crunchers into their circles of hell. We just goin’ to hafta pop for almanacs and go back ta listenin’ to what our gout and toe corns is tellin’ us from now on to figger out this here culture, for culture sho do act like molecules in the weather, patterns is patterns, and I’m goin’ miss reduction and various numeric ratiocinating afta all. Yep…
shorter me: any sample space Dr. Theodore Dalrymple inhabits is fubar hosed.
Are there not medications available that would help that poor fellow to speak as if he were semi-normal?
As to the quality of his thought, well, there’s not much medical science can do about that yet.
I haven’t read the interview, but Tony Daniels worked as a prison doctor for years and, given that background, I have always thought his views carry some weight when he speaks about “the underclass”. This is mainly because I know very little of this “underclass”, but he writes with such conviction I have always assumed he is correct. And he is a good writer. He’s got a lot of essays online so you can check it out for yourself. He’s pretty right-wing, pull-yourself-up-by-your bootstraps type, which has always seemed like nonsense to me because I grew up in the pampered middle class where everything was given to me whether I asked for it or not. But he can write. I don’t agree with what he says but I admire his writing and his ability to craft an argument.
Linking over to this jagoff’s youtube channel, I noticed, while looking at the stills of his other videos, that the flag in the background framed his head and made the esteemed Barney The Chafin’, look suspiciously like the Mayor of Munchkin Land.
MIGHT be corporatist?!?!?! WTF?
And look out for corruption of statistics? Dude, get a load of how the Federal Reserve has re-jiggered any metric it is unhappy with or eliminated it altogether so we don’t know how much they’ve been printing in the back room; they’ve been doing it for decades now, but like everything else, it got much, much worse under Shrub. This guy thinks he’s predicting the future and it is already long gone in the rear view mirror.
I have to disagree. I think Dr. Dairypimple is spot on. Ummm…this interview was from the fall of 2000 right? Nevermind.
No! That’s not how the quote goes! Scarlett O’Cheney vows, “As G-d is my witness, I’ll never be hungry again!”
I’m going to welcome the Bidens to Mrs. Biscuitbarrel’s neighborhood with a banner and homemade bread…
Bernie is, as we say, a fucking retarded douche nozzle. The Brit, let’s just introduce him to Ted Haggard and Mark Foley. Oh, and Ted’s crank dealer. They can all watch “Deliverance” together. That fucked up banjo kid is still alive, didja know? Big news on AOL yestiddy.
A veritable Möbius strip of stupid.
How about in terms of funkability and bootyliciousness?