Enjoy.

any husband whose skills are so low that he’s inspiring the ‘I’m not in the mood’ brush-off is clearly a failure at the human sexual art form, which is to say he is clearly a republican, a synonym for failure in every non-destructive human endeavor, not the least of which is human sexual pleasure.

Feel free to piss off.

Did anyone actually read Prager’s piece before snarking? (And geez, I can’t believe that I find myself defending Prager). Here’s the question: is sex part of the “job” of marriage? Is there “duty”, not just sexual, in marriage? I say yes, on both the man and woman’s part. But those are hated words in our postmodern world. We’re much more “comfortable” with doing what feels right, with decisions based on mood. This is the core of Prager’s column, and while he’s clumsy as always in his writing, I agree with the premise. I’ve been amazed at the clueless commenting about this article, esp. over at GOS and Pandagon. As tballou pointed out above, I’ll guess that the most vitriol comes from those who are not married, or married but a short time.

I replied to Amy Alkon on consumerist blog a few days ago (see here).

She was trying to stir up some anti-Muslim hate by referring to jihadwatch.org which reported 12 percent of Canadian Muslims were in favor of terrorism against Canada.

I went to that website and was disgusted at the comments from those insanely racist freaks.

But… that’s just worth noting what kind of websites Amy Alkon reads up on.