Comments on: Palin/ Cheney (but not that Cheney) 2012

By: MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel

MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:27:23 +0000

Liz Cheney has FIVE children, mostly younger than Palin’s four and her grandson-masquerading-as-a-son, and the other grandson. So that’s a minimum of TEN rosy-cheeked, possibly meth-cranked kids on the RNC stage!

Funny how the IOKIYAR goes double when Republican multiparas go right back to work. They don’t get trashed the way that Democratic mothers who work do. Highly recommended: http://www.palindeception.com/blog.

By: HalloweenJack

HalloweenJack — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:10:53 +0000

Dang, I thought you might have been talking about Mary Cheney. You know that they’d be desperate enough to try it, even though most GLBT folk hate Mary for working for her dad’s elections.

By: Ruthie

Ruthie — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:02:53 +0000

Oh, there is a hell. But Cheney deserves to spend the rest of eternity sitting on a freaking cloud listening to church Muzak and Jerry Falwell’s sermonizing, in a place where people are too prissy to say f*ck–let alone actually do it!

By: JuliaGrey

JuliaGrey — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:19:53 +0000

We can only hope that boffo mofo is in jail before 2012 serving a long sentence for crimes against humanity, and if that isn’t possible, then dead so the earth can be rid of him.

I have a sneaking suspicion that Monsieur Cheney knows right now that he’s dying soon. He’s lost a conspicuous amount of weight recently, and knowledge of impending death would certainly help to explain why he’s been so anxious to “set the record straight.”

One shouldn’t hope for anyone’s death, I suppose, but Cheney does seem like a special case. To have him off the scene would be a blessing, never mind the idea that he could be enjoying his just reward. Which for him would be the eternal contemplation of what he hoped would be a noble legacy becoming a heap of dung and ashes, upon which History will ceaselessly piss.

One can’t help but hope there really is such a thing as Hell, y’know?

By: discoclark66

discoclark66 — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:41:21 +0000

I forgot about the teabagger that posted about how Phyllis Schafley was at one event talking about the “future” of conservatism.

How about “Cheney/Schafley” PFLAG 2012?

By: JDM3

JDM3 — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:31:40 +0000

PS Sarah would be ever so effective outside pissing into the Big Tent of the GOP.

By: JDM3

JDM3 — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:30:18 +0000

Bravo! Substantial older candidates are a republiKKKan tradition. And right on, Tigers! Let’s run Rumsfeld for Veep and call the whole thing “The Reviving The Spirit of Hobey Baker Campaign.” No mean grrlz like Sarah Palin allowed.

By: amaravilha

amaravilha — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:58:34 +0000

Coincidentally, Dick Cheney is my first choice for GOP nominee in 2012. Or if it’s not him, perhaps he could be draped around the neck of the nominee, like a medallion or a cross or an albatross.

Also, no low blows are to be made at Princeton, which is an excellent institution of higher learning, full of learning, wisdom, erudition, and insufferable douchebags.

By: discoclark66

discoclark66 — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:40:06 +0000

I didn’t know “The One Percent Doctrine” was Cheney’s plan for approval ratings.

He’ll always have Bobo.

By: Ruthie

Ruthie — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:39:38 +0000

Palin/Cheney (Lynn)? Let’s see if I’ve grasped the wingnut strategy: Run candidates that are so objectionable to the conservatards that most of the religious right stays home on election day 2012, sulking in their Barcaloungers. Then the next day, Faux News can whip them into a frenzy with the breaking story that Barak Obama’s second win is the result of a Librul conspiracy to rig the election.