<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wingnut Welfare: The Lawyering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/</link>
	<description>\&#34;...a somewhat popular blogger\&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:47:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pseudonymousinnc</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33635</link>
		<dc:creator>pseudonymousinnc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Wendy Long Wingnut Welfare Nameplate Organization apparently isn’t a nonprofit — at least, there’s no entry on Guidestar — so there’s no formal fundraising body. I’d like to know exactly where those donations are headed, and I’m sure the IRS would agree.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Judicial_Confirmation_Network&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SourceWatch&lt;/a&gt; has more: the arrangement is more convoluted and intriguing here than most wingnut welfare 501(c)(3) or (c)(4) operations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No matter what, it’s just some official-sounding name they made up so she can show up as something other than “Wendy Long, random wingnut without a day job.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s funny how so many “two people, a laundry-room office and a maildrop” operations seem to run on about $3m a year and give their head honchos six figure salaries. There are &lt;i&gt;tons&lt;/i&gt; of them — I look at the tax forms and see the same ballpark donation numbers all the time. There’s a book to be written on the legal money laundering that goes on here: the orgs pop up for an election or a single-issue campaign and go dormant, then come back with a fresh injection of Scaife-juice.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wendy Long Wingnut Welfare Nameplate Organization apparently isn’t a nonprofit — at least, there’s no entry on Guidestar — so there’s no formal fundraising body. I’d like to know exactly where those donations are headed, and I’m sure the IRS would agree.  <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Judicial_Confirmation_Network" rel="nofollow">SourceWatch</a> has more: the arrangement is more convoluted and intriguing here than most wingnut welfare 501(c)(3) or (c)(4) operations.</p>
<p>No matter what, it’s just some official-sounding name they made up so she can show up as something other than “Wendy Long, random wingnut without a day job.”</p>
<p>It’s funny how so many “two people, a laundry-room office and a maildrop” operations seem to run on about $3m a year and give their head honchos six figure salaries. There are <i>tons</i> of them — I look at the tax forms and see the same ballpark donation numbers all the time. There’s a book to be written on the legal money laundering that goes on here: the orgs pop up for an election or a single-issue campaign and go dormant, then come back with a fresh injection of Scaife-juice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unclemike</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33628</link>
		<dc:creator>unclemike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just noticed: the “Judicial Confirmation Network” is so current and up-to-date, they have a picture in their header of the Supreme Court–when there were still &lt;em&gt;two&lt;/em&gt; females on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed: the “Judicial Confirmation Network” is so current and up-to-date, they have a picture in their header of the Supreme Court–when there were still <em>two</em> females on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33614</link>
		<dc:creator>MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33614</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Those are some of the worst graphics I’ve ever seen. Appropriate for the content, I suppose.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are some of the worst graphics I’ve ever seen. Appropriate for the content, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonkers</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33606</link>
		<dc:creator>bonkers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 05:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33606</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Don’t understand why she’d want to promote that she’s Order of the Queef.  Should probably see a doctor about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t understand why she’d want to promote that she’s Order of the Queef.  Should probably see a doctor about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.BDH</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33605</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.BDH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33605</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;She attended Schoolcraft College and the University of Detroit, and resides in Livonia, Michigan, with her husband, Terry, and is the mother of two grown daughters.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have a winner!  A wingnut has lowered the bar below Newt “Close  Cover Below Striking” College Assitant with Refuse Removal Duties Gingrich.  I do hope the twentifirst century evolution entails minimal intellectual skills.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>She attended Schoolcraft College and the University of Detroit, and resides in Livonia, Michigan, with her husband, Terry, and is the mother of two grown daughters.</i> </p>
<p>We have a winner!  A wingnut has lowered the bar below Newt “Close  Cover Below Striking” College Assitant with Refuse Removal Duties Gingrich.  I do hope the twentifirst century evolution entails minimal intellectual skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwingsnarkle</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33603</link>
		<dc:creator>Rightwingsnarkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 02:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33603</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt; She previously served as a press secretary in the U.S. Senate, for…former U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey (R-N.H.). &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hey, that tells me everything I need to know about the lady. Ol’ Gordo was the wackiest in a long line of truly insane elected officials from the Granite State.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> She previously served as a press secretary in the U.S. Senate, for…former U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey (R-N.H.). </i></p>
<p>Hey, that tells me everything I need to know about the lady. Ol’ Gordo was the wackiest in a long line of truly insane elected officials from the Granite State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion in Savannah</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33599</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion in Savannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33599</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Would that be an earlier wide stance?  [snort]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would that be an earlier wide stance?  [snort]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fardelsbear</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33598</link>
		<dc:creator>fardelsbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33598</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, if anyone is interested, the JCN has collected a nice, um, collection of wingnut articles from 2005 on the abuse of filibustering of judicial nominees.  I’m sure all of these people will be consistent in their earlier stance when it is time to vote for Obama’s candidates:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/archive/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/archive/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if anyone is interested, the JCN has collected a nice, um, collection of wingnut articles from 2005 on the abuse of filibustering of judicial nominees.  I’m sure all of these people will be consistent in their earlier stance when it is time to vote for Obama’s candidates:</p>
<p><a href="http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/archive/" rel="nofollow">http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/archive/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJay</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33596</link>
		<dc:creator>SJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33596</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;She made partner so she either committed some huge offense or, more likely, decided to do the mommy track, which would fit in with the Long laundry room locale for the JCN.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She made partner so she either committed some huge offense or, more likely, decided to do the mommy track, which would fit in with the Long laundry room locale for the JCN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moeman</title>
		<link>http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33595</link>
		<dc:creator>moeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbogg.firedoglake.com/2009/05/27/wingnut-welfare-the-lawyering/#comment-33595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;heh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/downloads&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/downloads&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh</p>
<p><a href="http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/downloads" rel="nofollow">http://judicialnetwork.com/contents/downloads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.206 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 00:54:59 -->

