Chase isn’t the one she married, I hope?

No. I think his name is Tupac or something….

Probably not the first eleven-year-old he’s tried to educate on such matters… this is just the first time in anger.

One can imagine “Chase” finishing up explaining the ins-and outs of scrotum sucking to an eleven year-old girl and, with a triumphant grin, turning to the other adults in the room and saying, “Am I right? Am I right? C’mon high five! Woo! Give it up!”.

To be recorded and played back to him by a colleage once he is inevitably recruited to join the clown parade of CNN political analysts, y’know, for balance.

What a douche. Any lib mother I know would have slapped that stupid grin right off his face. And, any 11 year old I know would already have that kind of info anyway.

Looks like that comment was already deleted. Apparently even Ann Althouse has her limits.

Oh, and I’d be reminding him that THEY chose that name THEMSELVES!

This last Monday, while we visited a friends home, an acquaintance of our friends that I had not previously met started on a rant about teabaggers.

I have the funny feeling there’s a reason that Chase hadn’t met them before. In fact, with social skills like his, I’m surprised he has any friends at all. He should have even more time for socially inept blog commenting now.

Not sure if this isn’t a false flag operation:

http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/because-everybody-knows-theres-no-casual-racism-or-misogyny-on-the-right#comments

Although, in re-reading, it may be that SEK merely provoked Chase, and not that he was Chase. Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we start with the ratfucking, also.

Until this sort of thing gets properly sorted out, Chase is no longer welcome, um, anywhere close by.

I thought the teabaggers referred to themselves as teabaggers in the very first place, and us liberals immediately ran with it (because why wouldn’t we and Jesus, also?)

Ann Althouse speculating the Teabonic flickr set was photoshopped is hilarious. I speculate she tipped a couple of boxes before she wrote that.

Nobody was all that interested later on when the host said, “So. Who’s up for pudding?”

What, you want him to explain that too? Just be thankful there was no “cheesecake” or “cherry pie”, let alone “apple tarts.”

Ann Althouse speculating the Teabonic flickr set was photoshopped

No, she didn’t!! How could she? Does she know nothing about anything? (Silly question.)

For those who haven’t seen it, the best of ‘Bagging.

Here’s how I imagine the rest of this conversation:

“Anyone here got a bananer and a couple of walnuts in a mesh bag? ‘Cuz I wanna demonstrate… What?!?! Gotta train the little tyke, amirite? Hey, hey, hey, what are you doing with those tinsnips? OWWWWWWWWWW”

Chase’s comment is still there as of this moment (9:21 pm cdt). There are more than 200 comments, so possibly if you click to leave a comment, you only get the last page’s worth and the earlier ones are truncated. But click on “1-200″ or whatever, and it’s still there in all its glory. So not so fast with that complimentary box of wine…

There’s an update to this story.

It turns out, Ann – who implored liberals to LEAVE THE TEABAGGERS ALONE! – was April-fooled.

Sadly, neither Ann nor her commenters were offended by the liberal who posed as one of them.

A few comments down someone asks if maybe it’s Photoshopping. Yes, it’s so easy to Photoshop errors onto people’s signs. (I wonder if there are any defamation lawsuits based on the photographic lie that results.)

Also, pretty sure SEK didn’t post anything over there, but was merely riffing on Lew Rockwell’s idiotic post (referenced in the Balloon Juice link in SEK’s post) that any bigot eruption at a tea protest ought to be presumed to be the work of a provocateur.

Tbogg, you could get from one end of that comment thread to the other? You have my mad respect.

Sounds more likely someone was replaying in their little mind “That’s what I shoulda said”. Yeah, boy howdy.

Wingnutz are only that brave in a crowd of other wingnutz or when posing with a loaded gun.

She didn’t chase off Chase. The comment is just on the page with comment #’s 100-199 – go there and search for “chase”.

Although that now appears to be an April Fools joke gone horribly awry.

You’ll notice, however, that I didn’t suggest you search for “cunt”, because god only knows what you’d pick up there.

OK, I understand the whole tea-bagging thing. But what’s this I hear about sticking a finger dipped in tabasco sauce up somebody’s ass?

How does someone with a law degree and who teaches law write something so incredibly stupid?

One can get an “incredibly stupid” law degree in the United States. At Liberty U or where ever Ann got hers. Probably from the send away for…! section on the back of a cereal wine box.

For anyone just coming in: The stupid and offensive comments by “Chase” and his/her defenders were original to Althouse’s blog. SEK put up an April Fool’s post at Lawyers, Guns, and Money claiming to have authored the offending posts. Listen carefully: The claim was the joke. Because that was too subtle for some people, SEK put up a clarification. He did not write the comments at chez Althouse.

“Jerk Store was a GREAT comeback!!”

Sure, that cunt Althouse probably finished last-in-her-class from Mail In University. Do we get to call her a “dickwad” too, or should we be classy and just stick with “bitch”?