God, Mom, I’m bored. There’s nothing to dooooooooooooo:
Coverage of the BP oil spill has certainly reached marathon status, the kind of thing still likely to lead on the evening newscasts — so likely that the networks risk evoking “oh not that again” reactions from viewers. It’s an unhappy fact of TV news life: the bigger the story’s significance, the longer it rules the newscasts — and the greater the danger the public will tune out.
[snip]
One of the unkinder peripheral ironies of a calamity like this one: The longer it goes on, the more likely public outrage will turn to jejune ennui — what infuriated people when they first learned of it has devolved into a pesky inconvenience; of course, this is only true of those experiencing it vicariously — even if on high-def TV.
People who experience it that way, which is not really experiencing it at all, might stop seeing it as a menace to the environment and begin to view it as — mad though it sounds — an impertinence that disrupts their escapist TV-viewing. As such reaction escalates, blame shifts from the company that should have prevented the spill to the media companies whose employees dutifully report on its virulent persistence.
Shales goes on to blame the coverage of Obama’s emotional temperature or whatever on the terribly important need to keep viewers from getting bored by the boring story that is boring about all the boring people and animals and fish that are dying because of the horrendous fuckups made by British Petroleum, which is British and therefore double-boring.
And OH MY GOD does this make me crazy. I hate this dodge, like, the press is all-powerful and all-knowing and sets standards for our national conversation, except when it’s totally powerless and at the whims of the ADD American public, who will stop watching after X number of days. In an amazing coincidence, that attention span lasts EXACTLY until the moment coverage becomes inconvenient and/or expensive. It’s so funny how that always works. You’re always able to pick a moment to convince yourself nobody gives a shit anymore, and that moment always corresponds to when you want to go home. It’s nice, in a way.
For you. Not so much, the ENTIRE GULF OF MEXICO AND EVERYONE LIVING NEAR IT.
This solipsistic asshole actually brings up the Iran hostage crisis, as if Ted Koppel would be Ted Koppel without having had the balls to stick to a story for a long goddamn time instead of wittering off whenever his bosses said they were tired of it. There are ALWAYS forces within and without a news organization telling people to get off stories they should stay on, and the greatest moments in American journalism have come when some courageous reporter says fuck you, I’m not leaving. You know, I read wanking day after day after day about the importance of the national press in framing our discourse and raising the critical issues of the day, and then I read shit like this, and nobody seems to understand you’re supposed to be the wind and not the weatherman.
If you as a journalist believe a story’s good enough to stick with, and you want people to pay attention, then you MAKE THEM PAY ATTENTION. You shove an issue in their faces day after day after day and you tell every caller who says he or she is just so tired of oily pelican pictures to shove it up their asses. You don’t want to stop covering the story? THEN DON’T STOP COVERING IT JESUS GOD. Fuck your focus groups. Fuck the “jejune ennui” of the people you imagine don’t care anymore and want to go back to American Idol. Fuck story fatigue. For once in your lives stick to the ideals you’re always bagging on bloggers for not having.
Sack up, and stay with the story if you want to stay with it. Or don’t, and at least have the courage to admit it wasn’t the viewers’ fault, that you just didn’t wanna anymore.
Schmuck.
x-posted at First Draft
A.



14 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Shales is a Style Columnist, one of those whiny, slack-handed, utterly useless twits who believe that the world revolves around their decree that something is or isn’t watchable/wearable/edible. Never mind that a Style Columnist like Shales is not competent at producing anything besides wordy decrees.
He’s ignorable.
In the mean time, the kids in this household are on summer hours: no electronics permitted between 10am and 6pm each day, with the notable exception of CSPAN. Which means we are watching the current House committee hearing on Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill and Drilling Safety on CSPAN-3 and are laughing at the predictability of the statements based on party affiliation, home state, or corporate identity.
Watchable, if not wearable or edible.
Heck, the jejune ennui approach to journamalism worked so damn well when the powerful determined it was time for their lackeys in the media to move on to something other than dead-americans-in-the-sand-why-again coverage of Iraq. No reason for the lot of them not to try it again with BP — and for noobs like Shales to bend over backwards to explain why all the serious journalists would absolutely love to cover the catastrophe, the implications, the backstory and all that, but, really, there’s just so much important stuff to write about trends in whole wheat baking and Nancy Pelosi’s extravagant lifestyles — and how about that soccer game, huh?
Actually, I think Van der Snoot, or whatever his name is, still gets more coverage.
The number one rule about being in a circle jerk is that you never let go.
So I hear, anyway.
Athenae,
This story is boring. Do you have anything on Tiger Wood’s secret porn baby? Actually, nevermind. I just checked out Tom “Don’t Call Me Murrow” Shales past headlines and this seems to be his area of expertise. Apparently, living a shallow, useless existence makes you an arbiter of shallow, useless existences.
Or, it takes one to know one.
OT, except for where’s-TBogg-when-I-want-him ennui — Yesterday, driving to the hospital in Towson where I am for the duration, I spotted, hanging from a raised deck, a faded garden flag with a portrait of — you guessed it —- a larger-than-life bassett! Coloring, slightly more Fenway than WEmbley.
It made me nostalgic.
Wanna bet I wouldn’t have noticed pre-TBogg and pix of his boyz?
Hope they’re all having a good time out there on the beach.
Well freaking said. Nicely done. I think this asshole ought to be shipped to the gulf and packaged with (six months seems about right) with a bunch of oil soaked debris, as a science experiment in whether oil-soaked assholes shed their skin in the presence of oil.
Is “style reporter” journalistic code for somebody hired this dick, and now can’t figure out how to fire him, so we’ve got a code name for him, that isn’t as anti-PC as calling him a dick?
He is from Elgin, Illinois and has spent decades in DC at the WAPO. He is the common clay of the new west.
Common clay? I can certainly agree. Shales is thick like mud.
Shales is dense like shale, even.
A –
What you said. My God, it’s like these people are passive conduits for what the media reports and why. THEY ARE THE FUCKING MEDIA. There are so many stories that surround this that, back in the day, it’d be the best beat in the world to be on. Government lassitude (Bush era deregulations, in particular), oil company kickbacks, corporate malfeasance, the little guy getting stomped on, etc. My God, if we had a functioning media, this would be the biggest story since at least Katrina, probably since 9/11. The angles are endless. Out of this, if we had a worthwhile media, we’d get an entirely new energy policy. Three mile island helped sink nuclear, this, easily its equal, should sink our oil dependence. Especially if we had a functional media, instead of these lazy, stupid Martians we’re cursed with.
Tom Shales is a long-time TV critic and a Pulitzer Prize winner.
Doesn’t mean he can’t insert his entire head up his anus from time to time.
I would agree with you, but I strongly doubt that Americans will care no matter how much more coverage it gets. I blamed the media for the war in Iraq, but in the end, even after being given the truth, not much outrage occurred. The war is still going on for goodness sake. It just seems that this country is falling apart. I think that television is a big part of the problem, but not just lack of news coverage. It has become a kind of drug for the population. People don’t want to hear bad news, so they change to a rerun of the third season of “The Real World” or Dancing with the Stars. This isn’t really a small thing. On demand, vapid entertainment is not doing this country any good.
I dunno, maybe it’s because I’m not as big a news junkie as some, but I have some sympathy for the “get a new story” feel, although not in the sense that dunderhead means. I remember when I were a wee lad that when a “big story” came around, there would be an initial hour or so of preemptive coverage, then back to normal programming with an interruption every hour or two with a 5-10 minute recap of the story, unless some major development took place.
Now you get 4-6 hours of straight coverage on the current “breaking news”, which mostly consists of repeating the same 3 facts every 30 minutes, with the other 95% of the time being taking up with mostly useless blovating about What It All Means and fact-free speculation that generally ends up having to be retracted when the actual facts are determined. Except usually they don’t bother to do that, so the fact-free speculations end up in everyone’s heads as the real story because they were so much more gripping than the mundane explanations that turned out to be the actual case.
Anyway, to my mind if there’s any “oh, no, not that again” that turns up (in my head at least), it’s because I get tired of seeing the exact same story repeated the exact same way for the 5th straight time. Get back to me when you can tell me something more, okay?
This does not negate anything Jay B. said at #10, either. Yes, there are a dozen angles real journalists could be following up on that would make fascinating, informative news, but doing that, as your headline says, is HAAAARD and apparently gives them a sad.
Shales can deliver some good columns on primetime TV shows, but on news and political coverage, not so much.