Then, after Vietnam, an ethos of exposure swept the culture. The assumption among many journalists was that the establishment may seem upstanding, but there is a secret corruption deep down. It became the task of journalism to expose the underbelly of public life, to hunt for impurity, assuming that the dark hidden lives of public officials were more important than the official performances.
Then came cable, the Internet, and the profusion of media sources. Now you have outlets, shows and Web sites whose only real interest is the kvetching and inside baseball.
In other words, over the course of 50 years, what had once been considered the least important part of government became the most important. These days, the inner soap opera is the most discussed and the most fraught arena of political life.
And into this world walks Gen. Stanley McChrystal.
General McChrystal was excellent at his job. He had outstanding relations with the White House and entirely proper relationships with his various civilian partners in the State Department and beyond. He set up a superb decision-making apparatus that deftly used military and civilian expertise.
But McChrystal, like everyone else, kvetched. And having apparently missed the last 50 years of cultural history, he did so on the record, in front of a reporter. And this reporter, being a product of the culture of exposure, made the kvetching the center of his magazine profile.
Where to begin.
Does one start with the fact that a general in charge of a war complaining about said war and the people conducting it and by the way, jokes about the cheese-eating surrender monkeys notwithstanding, DYING ALONG WITH U.S. SOLDIERS, is newsworthy no matter what “culture of exposure” you are living in? That this wasn’t some trivial thing about how, say, somebody said he’d quit smoking but was being lifed about it daily by the White House press corps? Or got a blow job from an intern?
Or that it was the reporter’s job to produce a profile of the general and even if he’d been brought up by Dwight Eisenhower himself entirely inside a terrarium decorated by Donna Reed, he’d have still had to get his lede from somewhere? And that he didn’t exactly hold a gun to McChrystal’s head and make him wisecrack about Biden?
Or that, you know, “the establishment” those unfortunate and nasty journalists had such dark suspicions about turned out to, in fact, BE FULL OF CROOKS AND ASSHOLES WHO WERE TRYING TO RUIN THE COUNTRY BEFORE JOURNALISTS EXPOSED THEM? God forbid anyone lose their childlike innocence after the Gulf of fucking Tonkin.
Possibly David here could get some of his friends at THE NEW YORK TIMES to explain to him that it has ALWAYS been the job of the journalist to “expose the underbelly of public life,” to sort out the bullshit and tell people what was really going on. Upton Sinclair. Nelly Bly. Lincoln Steffens. Ida Tarbell. They practiced the craft long before this “culture of exposure” existed, and thank God for it and all who carry on their work today. I think it’s time David went back to school. Obviously he missed a few history courses IN HIS OWN GODDAMN TRADE.
This may be my favorite part, though:
Another scalp is on the wall. Government officials will erect even higher walls between themselves and the outside world. The honest and freewheeling will continue to flee public life, and the cautious and calculating will remain.
First, megalomaniacal idiots will always shoot their mouths off to reporters, so access will never be the problem. Second, I don’t see David retiring from his very public life to go tend goats or whatever because of the horribleness of the world in which we now live. Third, oh my God, so long as public life continues to offer fat stacks and loving tongue-baths from the gullible assholes in our national newspapers, people will be lining up for it, even if they’re subjected to the occasional indignity of being asked a question or two by a real reporter to satisfy our hippiefied, patchouli-stinking “culture of exposure.”
A.




33 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
In 1863 David f*cking Brooks would have loved McLellan, not that dirty hick Abe Lincoln.
I’ll take the opinion of the Tillman Family over the always odious D. Brooks any fucking day.
Just sayin’
Great stuff from all of you today – have a good weekend, all!
Weepers, I must have missed all of the kvetching and inside baseball on the part of the media from 2000 to 2008. I feel so out of it.
Then, after Vietnam, an ethos of exposure swept the culture. The assumption among many journalists was that the establishment may seem upstanding, but there is a secret corruption deep down.
Pentagon Papers? Watergate? Iran-Contra? Never happened.
I hate David Brooks with the burning passion of a thousand suns. Honestly. I think polite conservatards who can spell correctly are just as evil as the crazy ranters and much more dangerous, because they look normal.
My Lord, woman, that was just beautiful.
“Later in life, however, Ms. Reed became an ardent antiwar campaigner, serving during the Vietnam era as co-chairwoman of a 285,000-member group called Another Mother for Peace and working for Senator Eugene McCarthy in the 1968 presidential race. In his biography, Mr. Fultz quotes her as saying that ‘she looked forward to a time when “19-year-old boys will no longer be taken away to fight in old men’s battles.”‘”
During WWII, she corresponded with a number of soldiers and kept over 300 of their letters. Her image as a pristine homemaker is based upon her TV show and a terrarium decorated by her would include a lot of heart and humanity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/arts/25donna.html
“Upton Sinclair. Nelly Bly. Lincoln Steffens. Ida Tarbell.”
Weren’t they all Socialists?
Oh, yeah, it’s the Internetz’s fault that we get such shallow coverage of American politics.
Jeebus Freeging Cripes.
No. Sorry. We go to the Internetz to escape this shit, ya fuckin moron.
Ditto this. Something coming from the cultured mouth of David Brooks will be considered more erudite and reliable (for non-crazy Americans) than, from, say a Glenn Beck. But, Brooks’ shit is pretty much the same–just wrapped in a prettier package. I think he’s just mad because he had to let the senator fondle his thigh under the dinner table in order to get any info whereas Hastings didn’t have to whore himself out to get his story written.
Thanks, gmoke. That would explain why the media treats Donna Reed as if there was a huge gap in her life. Kinda like how they pretend that Helen Keller’s life stopped at age twenty when in fact she lived on for sixty more years (Why the hush-hush? She became a Socialist, that’s why), or how nothing happened in Dr. King’s life in the nearly five years between the March on Washington and his death (Hint: He was a leader of the burgeoning antiwar movement, and if he had lived it likely wouldn’t have disintegrated into an incoherent mess that turned off the very Middle Americans it needed to persuade).
No kidding.
Now, now, everyone simma down.
David Brooks deplores the reporting of secrets, scandals, and “impurity” because his job is and always has been the opposite: minimize the secrets, defend the scandals, explain away corruption, and lionize the criminals. Among a certain set, that is.
Investigative journalism, to Brooks, is merely transcribed “kvetching” because his perspective is so different, you see. What can you expect from someone who, on a daily basis, takes liars at their word, puts (with his own tongue) the shiniest gloss possible on the evasions and rationalizations and falsehoods of the powerful, and calls it “punditry”?
Hastings did make one mistake: He buried his lede.
Our effort in Afghanistan is failing, and Americans and Afghans alike are dying unnecesarily as a result, a fact Hastings devotes a couple of grafs to near the end of a 6-page article. That’s what matters. Whether McChrystal said things he shudna, and whether Hastings shud or shudna published them, is pretty much immaterial next to that.
Is Brooks’ whining rant sort of like how the Vatican kept trying to blame a lot of other people/societal stuff for why priests raped kids?
Just more conservative hypocrisy and double standards coming atcha. Hey, it wasn’t McChrystal’s fault that he shot off his big mouth at the Rolling Stone journalist (who, uh, behaved like a journalist… who’da thunk it??). No, it was the dirty hippy journo’s fault for … ????
Brooks is execrable. I like how a prior commenter said they hated Brooks with the passion of a 1000 burning suns… indeed! Can’t stand him. ICK.
Bull Hockey. McChrystal was wrong; he got caught & busted; get over it.
Why… that’s wonderful!! ;-)
Perfect…He just couldn’t stand another war hero.
I thought the 4th estate’s job was exposure. Silly me. Access is soo much more important.
Poor, poor David Brooks. What did they teach him at the University of Chicago History department that let him write this?
After Vietnam?
That sort of thing has been a part of American journalism since there was an America. For instance, the Philadelphia Aurora was doing that while John Adams was president:
Benjamin Franklin Bache was Ben Franklin’s grandson, who went into the newspaper business when his grandpa died and left his books and printing presses to his grandson.
–
He, (McChrystal), would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn’t been for those meddling kids!
Actually, it looks like the RS reporter was more like a stenographer. Didn’t seem to have to do much to get the goods, except turn on the recorder.
What did they teach Bobo at U.Chicago, home of Leo Strauss? Lie in the interest of the power of the state, of course.
This is true, but he did write it up, like any decent journalist would. What did McC think would happen? And why is Bobo criticising it? The last question, particularly, is rhetorical.
Not sure what McC thought, except it seems he did think he’d get away with it. Like he got away with the Tillman ‘coverup’ even after it was uncovered. Suspect McC has gotten away with more than we’ve done. Here’s an interview of RS author, but not much new on it.
“It’s the reporter’s fault.”
How that works with a general whom Brooks claims missed the past 50 years of American reportial and cultural history is beyond me, as well as beyond logic and rational discourse.
Brooks’ claim that McChrystal – at least the Gen. McChrystal Brooks describes – is fully qualified to win the hearts and minds of millions of Afghans, thousands of troops, Senators on the Hill (who gave advice and consent for his stars and give it for his appointments), his bosses at the Pentagon, and the guy in the White House, yet isn’t savvy enough to keep his trap shut with a national reporter, is equally fantastical.
As I pointed out here (and as EW discusses tangentially here), Mr. Brooks’ job is to create a false narrative and deliver it as simplistically and seemingly naively and objectively as possible. He has the simplistic part down pat; the rest, not so much.
I think the current drink of choice for our “hippiefied, patchouli-stinking “culture of exposure”” is the fermented sweet tea known as kambucha, but I could be wrong. Mr. Brooks, I’m pretty sure, when lounging on the veranda in Bethesda, sticks to gins and tonic.
The culture of exposure:
I.F. Stone had an extraordinary capacity for independence at any personal cost. His opposition to Joseph McCarthy and his determination to expose the excesses of J. Edgar Hoover kept him a political pariah when America was cowed by McCarthyism.
So true, Bobo. Our government worked so much better back in the days when black people were prevented from voting, every body of water in America was poison, fifty thousand Americans and half a million Vietnamese were being killed for no reason, and gay people dared not speak their name. Those were the days!
AND LO BOBO SPAKE YE UPON THEM THUS YE!
“Another scalp is on the wall. Government officials will erect even higher walls between themselves and the outside world. The honest and freewheeling will continue to flee public life, and the cautious and calculating will remain.”
LO BOBO DOUCHE YE!
> General McChrystal was excellent at his job.
WTF? We won the Afghan War of Aggression and nobody told me?
And I worship at the Shrine of Athenae.
I am not worthy…