Serious pundit opines (because that is what serious pundits do, they “opine”) on sad state of affairs when shoddy reporting is used to generate intertubes traffic and then …????….profit!:
But the Vanity Fair piece on Sarah Palin is so emblematic of much that’s wrong about the way she’s covered that it’s worth returning to, and I’ve learned that the its long wind-up is based on fundamental confusion about which of Palin’s children was at an event in Kansas City.
Palin almost never talks to neutral media outlets, leaving her — as critics accurately note — subject to none of the questions, challenges and reality checks that the political press puts regularly to almost every other national political figure. She takes a lot of heat for this, deservedly.
But with the hunger for information about her, and the traffic she drives, the press sometimes compensates by printing such thinly sourced, badly reported nonsense about her that it’s hard to imagine it making it into a serious magazine like Vanity Fair if it concerned any other figure. Of course, this might not happen if she spoke to reporters, but that’s no excuse.
Thank you Jay Rosen for…oh— that wasn’t Jay Rosen? Oh. Okay. Then thank you Jim Romenesko for illuminating— oh fuck… now what? I’m working here. Oh. Not Romenesko?
It was Ben Smith? From fucking Politico?
Jesus. What? Did Harris and VandeHei have the mirrors taken out of the men’s room again so that the “reporters” would forget who they were and who they worked for since that job writing Scouts In Action updates at Boys Life fell through? Must be.
But, yes Ben, it was wrong for Vanity Fair to flog a maybe mostly made up story but only because that is Politico’s job, so back off elitist Condé Nast limp-pencil-dicked writer fags and leave it to the professionals. Like that time when Ben Smith wrote that John Edwards would be announcing that he would be dropping out of the Presidential race and then he totally didn’t. Awesome.
One might call that “thinly sourced, badly reported nonsense” or one might call it “win the morning, win the afternoon“, but none dare call it responsible journalism. But whatever. Forget it, Jake. It’s Politico…




11 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
She’s plain-spoken! She’s a goddess! She’s plain-spoken! She’s a goddess!
You see, most people never have to face the fact that at the right time and the right place, Sarah Palin is capable of anything.
Honest mistake by Vanity Fair. People have mixed up Trig and Todd before
You have hit the bullseye once again, Tom. The DC journalists really are a bunch of Heathers, and Smith is just upset because someone else got to criticize Sarah before he did. How frigging juvenile…my model for journalism was the NYT publishing the Pentagon Papers and the Washington Post revealing the Watergate scandal to the world. Nah gunna happen, since the oft-predicted (q.v. Network, released in 1976) corporate takeover of media outlets has resulted in watered-down, business-friendly news divisions. Paddy Chayevsky is laughing at us all…or crying.
I get them mixed up with Tagg, and he’s in another family.
The DC journalists really are a bunch of Heathers, and Smith is just upset because someone else got to
criticizefellate Sarah before he did.Fixed. Yeah, I know, technically impossible, but I’m going for the metaphoric sense of the word.
The only reporters who deserve to cover Sarah are those who are potent and fully erect. OK well erect. OK well little dick erect. Cause she wont talk to anybody with a bigger dick than Trig.
and that is why we love her so. she makes us feel soo Big.
Michael Joseph Gross, the guy who wrote the Vanity Fair article, sez he “left the worse stuff out” about Sarah.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/02/vanity-fairs-sarah-palin-_n_703412.html
What kinda freakin’ journalist is he? If he were a patriot, he would have headlined the worst, and exagerrated it. Jeebus.
OK, I haven’t read the piece, but
“…a serious magazine like Vanity Fair…”
I’ve read some great articles in VF, but it’s not Foreign Affairs. Has he ever seen a copy? What would be a non-serious mag? Tiger Beat?
Politico editorial meeting (You-Tube, 2:17)
Big hit among DC-dwelling political media free-lancers and junior league think tankers at the time of its March release. I think it’s pretty funny myownself.
If you think you’ve given someone a beatdown it feels manlier to think they’re Shaq than the snarky halftime entertainment.
My money is on Joe McGinniss. Now THERE’S a man who knows how to put together a hit piece. The Vanity Fair article will look like a valentine.