It has been awhile since Our Lady of The Magical Dolphins, Peggy Noonan, has graced these, well, not pages, so probably your computer screen or maybe cellphone or whatever electronic geegaw you use to for that internet thingy. But Peggy is back and making the case that “the media” (which she is not a member of despite her WSJ column and the teevee appearances) is going to seduce and have its way with the 2010 class of Young Idealistic Republican freshmen like they were naive small-town girls fresh off the bus in Hollywood.
And while Peggy doesn’t want them to hold back from letting their freak flag fly, she offers up a cautionary tale of Republicans Past whom the media dated, dicked, and then dumped:
The mainstream media this January will be looking for the nuts.
I saw this in 1994, when the new Republican Congress came in. The media had a storyline in their head then, too: These wild and crazy righties who just got elected are . . . wild and crazy. They focused their cameras on people who could be portrayed as nutty, and found them. The spirited Helen Chenoweth, freshman from Idaho, talked a little too much about “black helicopters.” She was portrayed as paranoid and eccentric. Bob Livingston, from New Orleans, went to his first meeting of the Appropriations Committee wielding a machete. The new speaker, Newt Gingrich, was full of pronouncements and provocations; he was a one-man drama machine.
It was a high spirited group, and one operating without a conservative media infrastructure to defend them. They and others were caught and tagged like big wild birds, then released into the air, damaged.
I’m sure that there were some other members of that ill-fated class of ’94 who were a little bit nutty, but couldn’t Noonan have chosen examples who were a little less slutty?
Days after she began airing commercials urging President Clinton to resign over his affair with a White House intern, Idaho Rep. Helen Chenoweth yesterday acknowledged a long-term affair with a married man in the 1980s.
The two-term Republican’s admission to the Idaho Statesman is the latest sign that the Monica Lewinsky imbroglio has transformed the media and political culture, opening the floodgates to the sort of sexual investigations that the press once largely avoided.
“Fourteen years ago, when I was a private citizen and a single woman, I was involved in a relationship that I came to regret, that I’m not proud of. . . . This was in my past, and I’m very sorry,” Chenoweth, 60, said in a statement yesterday. “‚. . . I very much regret that this once-private episode is now causing our families pain once more.”
[...]
Chenoweth’s six-year affair was with a longtime business partner. Vern Ravenscroft, 78, a former state legislator and onetime candidate for governor, also acknowledged the affair to the Statesman, saying it ended 14 years ago.
Harriett Ravenscroft, his wife of 57 years, told the paper that Chenoweth was responsible for the affair. “They were business partners, yes, and it went beyond that and it shouldn’t have,” she said. “I want it forgotten and put behind us. I don’t see how Helen can live with herself and do this.”
For one thing, Gingrich pioneered a denial of adultery that some observers would later christen “the Newt Defense”: Oral sex doesn’t count. In a revealing psychological portrait of the “inner” Gingrich that appeared in Vanity Fair (September 1995), Gail Sheehy uncovered a woman, Anne Manning, who had an affair in Washington in 1977 with a married Gingrich.
“We had oral sex,” Manning revealed. “He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, ‘I never slept with her.’” She added that Gingrich threatened her: “If you ever tell anybody about this, I’ll say you’re lying.”
Manning was then married to a professor at West Georgia, the backwater college where Gingrich taught. “I don’t claim to be an angel,” she told Sheehy, but “he’s morally dishonest.”
[...]
As a high school student — precocious, lonely, overweight — Newt secretly romanced his geometry teacher, a buxom, matronly woman named Jackie Battley. The furtive romance with his 24-year-old teacher included nighttime sessions in the back of a car in remote areas of Fort Benning, Ga.
Once, Newt and Jackie were so worked up, they got their car caught in a tank trap on the military base and had to call his best friend to rescue them before a daylight exposé, according to the friend’s widow, Linda Tilton. Defying his stepfather, a stern Army colonel, Newt pursued Jackie, married her and promptly had two children.
Jackie Gingrich raised the daughters, worked to put Newt through graduate school and was a loyal political wife during his two unsuccessful campaigns for Congress in 1974 and 1976. In his make-or-break 1978 race, Gingrich enlisted Jackie to attack his female opponent, who had announced that if elected she would commute to Washington and allow her family to remain in Georgia. At Gingrich’s instigation, Jackie wrote a campaign letter declaring that Newt was a fine husband and would take his family with him, although his top aides already knew Gingrich was having affairs and the marriage was falling apart.
The most notorious incident in Gingrich’s marriage — first reported by David Osborne in Mother Jones magazine in 1984 — was when he cornered Jackie in her hospital room where she was recovering from uterine cancer surgery and insisted on discussing the terms of the divorce he was seeking.
Shortly after that infamous encounter, Gingrich refused to pay his alimony and child-support payments. The First Baptist Church in his hometown had to take up a collection to support the family Gingrich had deserted.
Six months after divorcing Jackie, Gingrich married a younger woman, Marianne, with whom he had been having an affair. They are still married, despite persistent (though unproven) rumors that Gingrich has had other dalliances.
Oh, about that.
“We don’t know. We just don’t know. If you find out, let me know. It’s a mystery.” So said Marianne Gingrich, the soon-to-be ex-wife of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, when asked why she thought Newt was being a hard-ass in the divorce proceedings he initiated against her.
We were talking Tuesday morning in a courtroom in the Superior Court of Washington, minutes before the latest hearing in the case, and I remarked that it was hard to make sense of Newt’s scorched-earth approach to the divorce, which has already revealed his six-year-long extramarital affair with congressional aide Calista Bisek and tainted whatever was left of his image as a family-values Republican.
And Robert Livingston:
In announcing that he had occasionally “strayed from my marriage,” House Speaker-designate Bob Livingston (R-La.) rejected the advice of other senior Republicans and agreed with his wife to disclose the affairs immediately, according to congressional GOP sources.
The timing of the announcement Thursday, on the eve of the debate on the impeachment of President Clinton over the alleged lies about his affair with Monica S. Lewinsky, troubled some GOP leaders. The disclosure also angered a handful of conservatives and moderates who believe he should have confessed before he ran for speaker last month.
[...]
Livingston, 55, made his disclosure in a series of meetings Thursday with other leaders, rank-and-file Republicans and Gingrich after being tipped off by a Louisiana political associate the day before that Hustler magazine was preparing a story about his extramarital relationships.
Hustler publisher Larry Flynt said in an interview yesterday that four women have come forward to say they had been involved with Livingston, one in the past three to four years. He said their stories are being carefully double-checked and will be made public, on the Internet and perhaps in Hustler, shortly after Jan. 1. Hustler is investigating charges of infidelity involving about a dozen members of Congress and senior government officials, he said.
[...]
“I think the contrast between Bob’s admission and telling the truth about this . . . and the president’s lying under oath and to the American people about his transgressions is profound,” said Rep. John Edward Porter (R-Ill.).
Rep. Wayne T. Gilchrest (R-Md.), who sat next to Livingston during the morning debate on impeachment, said he told the speaker that “we’re inside your skin.”
Oh, ick. I could have done without that “we’re inside your skin.” but since he brought it up.





68 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
It was a high spirited group, and one operating without a conservative media infrastructure to defend them.
Well, now they’ve got one. I like the euphemism, Peggy. “Al-Qaeda, a high-spirited group…”
Repressed sexual predators without any internal controls is the best description of Republican politicians. their sexuality matches their political philosophy.
Shouldn’t this post have some sort of black label warning about its potentially lethal effects on the reader’s libido?
Is there an acceptable amount for a lawmaker to talk about black helicopters?
Oh, that Peggy sure can turn a phrase. But “…They and others were caught and tagged like big wild birds, then released into the air, damaged…” gets me sidetracked from her point.
How does she think birds are tagged? Generally, they are fitted with a legband. That isn’t normally considered inflicting damage, unless she’s talking about the stress of having been captured to begin with.
I’m guessing that, in a drunken stupor, she envisioned something like a staple through the ear (like those used on cattle and other livestock) when she wrote about those poor freshman congresspersons. That would have actualy been a more appropriate analogy, now that I think of it.
Perhaps she was thinking of Dick Cheney when she crafted that awkward simile. Every thing he tags, from lawyers to Chiefs of staff, is released damaged.
She was
portrayed asparanoid and eccentric.Fixed.
Well, that explains Lynne. He tagged Liz too?
Hypocrisy. If you’re a Republican it’s a feature, not a bug.
You are, and will always be, my favorite blogger.
Cool Whhip.
Rhetorical question of the week: Was Nooners drunk when she wrote this?
Grawd but she’s a piece of work. Once in a while, a semi-coherent thought emerges from her, but then she relapses back into this weird gutteral vocalization she thinks is language.
OT: “I” before “E” except after “C” and when sounding like “ay” as in “neighbor” and “weigh”, except “weird” is weird.
Any blood alcohol level below 80-proof qualifies as sober for Peggers.
As for what, exactly brought down Bob Livingston, it was this:
Where is everyone? Did the rapture happen?
LOL!
No, it was the Rupture. They all ate bad burritos.
Don’t think the Rapture could have happened yet, seeing as how my nekkid ass hasn’t gone sailin’ up to Hebbin’. “g”
I don’t think I’ll be going to Hebbin’ when the rapture occurs – I want to stay here and play when all the wingers are gone.
I like it – the Rupture.
Everyone is on the Rap Tour.
Better think again, what are the odds any wingers will make the cut?
Just got finished reading bmaz above on the prospective pixie dusting of MERS.
I hope Feingold can put a “hold” on this crap, at least until Jan. 1.
They’re counting on “their” doG doing the right thing.
Yes, she overdosed on GOP.
Their idea of Hebbin sounds a lot like a restricted Country Club.
Of course it will be. Even the pool boys will be white.
Is it anyone’s fantasy to wake up next to that enormous head and hear that voice?
Rentboys are available to carry luggage upon request.
For some reason his voice always reminds me of quaking.
Hey, I was just reading bmaz and feeling despair. Your comment gave me a spark of hope. It ain’t over til its over.
Gaaaahhhhh!!! Oh hell no!
People who meet all the requirements except the minimum financial threshold ($5 million annual) can reside in Purgatory, which is modeled after 1950s suburban America.
On that happy note I will bid you adieu. Splendid evening to all.
G’nite, rf
Will they perform other duties?
I’ve been trying to place it, it’s like their weird cross between a that pedantic guy at work and Kermit the Frog.
Don’t forget that Newt converted to Catholicism, which means that in the eyes of his new church, his first two marriages don’t count in the standings.
Really? He was baptized at St. Charles Avenue Baptist Church in New Orleans when he went to Tulane. That is the church I grew up in. The minister later said he figured he hadn’t held Newt under long enough.
I bow to no one in my loathing of Gingrich, but that’s wrong – it hasn’t been that way since Vatican II. Speaking as someone who converted to marry a Catholic after a divorce. I had to get an annullment of my first marriage, and had to get my ex to fill out a questionnaire.
No free first or second marriages in the CAtholic church anymore.
I am told, by a convert to Orthodoxy, that that attitude may still prevail there. But that info may be out of date.
Gawd,I have reall got to quit thinking about this stuff for awhile. Once again, I bid you all good night. In the morning, we’ll have energy to continue the fight. Right?
Oh yes. Carrying crosses, carrying the disdain of the paying members, that kind of stuff. No “stress relief” though. Members had to leave the fun stuff behind to get into the club. Y’know…the whole “one man and one woman” thing…
Lots of outrage exhaustion these days.
“Repressed”? Furtive, maybe, repressed, no, I don’t get that impression. Hypocritical? They’re so far past hypocritical they really almost come out–you’ll pardon the expression–on the other side to the kind of religious sexual expression of the Russian cult that produced Rasputin.
Wow, that’s a great image. Bravo!
Money talks.
I gather Peggy indulges, as the old euphemism had it? Ah, so, that’s how you get thru your days as a professional Republican: Punch or Judy.
Must be. Does make you wonder, tho, doesn’t it.
Funny, funny, funny. What a great line.
Sr. G. Avery Lee quote.
Ain’t that the truth! I just turn the music up louder.
Which reminds me of a light-hearted and totally true event this blog should appreciate:
I live in Oklahoma City, and during Summer, most street corners have a bible-waving Baptist screamer in the evenings. Many years ago I was driving along in my little pickup truck, [fake] shrunken head hanging from my rear-view mirror, [fake] dead mouse hood ornament, when what to my wondering ears should I hear but “Sweet Transvestite” on the radio…right as I pulled up to a particularly long traffic light. My passenger window was open, I was in the right lane….what was I supposed to do but crank it up! I saw it as a sign from Grawd. The stars had aligned to bring me that moment, so who am I to deny the Baptist screamer a target?
Republican sex scandals are something to look forward to the next couple of years. It will be a welcome relief from the daily committee hearings on Obama’s birth certificate and muslim beliefs.
None will ever match the delightful mockability of Diaper David Vitter, though.
My cat says I must go to bed so she can get a proper snuggle. She’s been glaring at me for 30 minutes.
Nighty night
Good job on the “i before e” thing except no one has ever been able to explain to my satisfaction why “science” is the exception.
Great. Another grammatical twitch I must ponder (better than ruminating over the train-wreck that is Nooners).
that is distinctive linguistic proof that all science is wrong (and fake)
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/cindy-mccain-breaks-with-her-husband-in-gay-rights-video/
Think John will call her a cunt on Meet The Press on Sunday?
I believed that story when I read it during the campaign, especially given John’s well known nasty mouth, but I’ve come to believe it’s apocryphal. Just a reporter with a personal agenda. People have checked with the witnesses cited and they have not corroborated.
Course not – they would lose their chance to use the tire swing.
No, I’d bet real money it never happened. Even McNasty didn’t go that far.
Right
And I’ll net he never said this either:
“Do you know why Chelsea Clinton is so ugly?” he asked. “Because Janet Reno is her father.”
Nah, it’s simple. The “i before e except after c” rule applies to words with English, or Old English, and Germanic origins.
“Science” comes from Latin, in which the c was pronounced like k, so it is outside the rule.
I don’t know much, but after 4 years of Latin, I can answer that question.
Lots of English peculiar spelling comes totally from historic origins.
No, that was heard by lots of witnesses. He deserved to lose the presidency for that alone.
Oh, my. What a wonderful, clear answer to the question. Yer my hero.
Good job on the “i before e” thing except no one has ever been able to explain to my satisfaction why “science” is the exception.
What, the “i” DOESN’T come before the “e” in “science”?
I’ve been sad ever since you stopped advertising your job as Peggy Noonan stalker. This brought a little glint of joy to my eye.
Oh thank goodness Noonan didn’t mention the Spy Magazine stunt on fresh Congresscritters in the 1990s. With a little tweaking, I’m sure some enterprising outlet can work in a Freedonia question for the class o’ ’10.
Ah hell, just keep the same question: “”Do you approve of what we’re doing to stop ethnic cleansing in Freedonia?”
Hilarity ensues.
I think the author of the referenced comment presumed universal recollection of the full mnemonic:
So, the word “science” is an exception to the exception.
Brilliant. Explain, please, “weird” then.