Jonathan Chait has an excellent piece documenting the way in which what he calls the establishment, and I call Very Serious People, misjudged the way the debt ceiling thing would play out:
“The failure to understand the crisis we were entering was widely shared among centrist types. When Republicans first proposed tying a debt ceiling hike to a measure to reduce the deficit, President Obama instead proposed a traditional, clean debt ceiling hike. He found this position politically untenable for many reasons, one of them being that deficit scolds insisted that using the debt ceiling to force a fiscal adjustment was a terrific idea, and that connecting the deficit debate to a potentially cataclysmic financial event was the mark of seriousness.”
He then goes on to show how the usual suspects — the WaPo editorial page, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the Concord Coalition, etc. welcomed a crisis over the debt ceiling in the belief that it would lead to fiscal goodness.
[...]
As Chait says, the first thing you need to understand is that modern Republicans don’t care about deficits. They only pretend to care when they believe that deficit hawkery can be used to dismantle social programs; as soon as the conversation turns to taxes, or anything else that would require them and their friends to make even the smallest sacrifice, deficits don’t matter at all.
I can’t help but notice that Chait’s list of chumps is basically the same as the list of people who puffed up Paul Ryan and gave him an award for fiscal responsibility. Enough said.
or…….
Berger turned and looked out over the landscape of the newsroom. She saw a reporter and a photographer heading for the elevator, perhaps on their way to cover the May Day parade.
“Håkan, if I’m being a nuisance or if you’re busy today, I’ll come back tomorrow or the day after.”
“Today’s task is to write an editorial on the demonstrations. I could do it in my sleep. If the pinkos want to start a war with Denmark, then I have to explain why they’re wrong. If the pinkos want to avoid a war with Denmark, then I have to explain why they’re wrong.”
“Denmark?”
“Correct. The message on May Day has to touch on the immigration questions. The pinkos, of course, no matter what they say, are wrong.”
-from The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest by Steig Larsson



17 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Oh, Chuy.
May we all live thru this.
I call Zed and David Brooks, and Tom Freidman, and McMegan, and the Wapo, and the Grey Lady Down, and the Luke-Son-of-Timmeh, and the Sunday Gasbag-a-pa-looza.
Our dear Steig – who I recognized as Molly Ivins has passed, and we, we happy few, we band of brothers, must not let them down in our demand against deficits. We. Must. Demand. Deficits.
Spend until we can work our way back.
Spend, until we can increase and sustain demand.
We cannot take no for an answer.
I humbly withdraw my claim to Zed.
Following up/further details:
Steig Larsson and the Scandinavian Right:
I guess I ought to read books 2 and 3,now. If found “Girl with the dragon Tattoo” a heck of a page-turner, but so violent and depressing I couldn’t bring myself to read the next one, even though I had already bought it.
Sigh. My brain is so tired and my emotions so dulled, I bought a totally “cozy” mystery last night and read it thru in a couple hours. All the formula necessaries present; small-town, woman starting over, symopathetic but-elderly victims, good friends, loyal dog, policeman=who-may-become-love, etc. And all wrapped up tidily in the end.
What’s summer, if it’s not book juggling – balancing act of late night emotions?
Re: the last two Steig Larssons: yes, women are still a commodity in our world, (it’s a Man’s World Baby!) but here, were introduced to a whole new protaganist – and the genre is never going to be able to deny the likes of a Lizbeth Salander again!(when the pupil is ready, the teacher will appear).
That being said, pleasure reading restores!
Ifanyone wants to know – I always recommend John Nichols’ “Milagro Beanfield Wars.” Laugh. Out. Loud. Alone!
Ha…Milagro Beanfield Wars…something I’ve been “meaning to read” since the ’70′s….but somehow still haven’t.
Thanks for soothing my guilt about reading total trash last night. Also medieval history is my go-to distraction…except it does show how humans being haven’t changed and will [nearly] always be as stupid as possible.
(note: how we happened to decide to split form Britain at just the moment when we had actual statesmen is utterly beyond me.)
Longer than that. Over at Slacktivist, Fred put up a post with excerpts from a sermon by St John Chrysostom, which wouldn’t require a lot of editing to be used tomorrow.
Hmm, I just noticed that my link didn’t post. If anyone wants to read that piece on Larsson and the Scand Right, it’s the NewYorker Bookbench
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2011/07/stieg-larsson-and-the-scandinavian-right.html”
Well, that’s weird: I see the linked url on preview, but it’s gone on posting. Hmmm, let’s try removing the html tags
Read also.
And if you’re going to read Milagro, you have to read the other two books in the trilogy: The Magic Journey and Nirvana Blues. Harpooning of new age culture at its finest.
It always pisses me off that everyone reads Animal Farm and 1984 as a warning except conservatives, who read them as instruction manuals.
Also: Shock Doctrine, and Ayn Rand’s Anthem.
Just finished. Frankly, I’m almost as depressed after that as I was at the end of “Dragon Tattoo.” Sheesh.
Guess I’ll have to put the whole Milagro Beanfield trilogy on my list.
Funny is good, especially these days.
Is this the updated version of the Liar’s Paradox? Because if so, it’ll never be any good at talking intelligent computers to death.
That was one of my favorite scenes in Larsson’s trilogy.
Loved that Nichols’ trilogy. The sex scenes, especially, had a peculiar effect on a young man coming of age.
Just now finishing Hiassen’s “Star Island” which was a followup/antidote to Kingsolver’s beautiful “Lacuna.” Carl does South Florida debauchery and madness at like no one else.
Make sure to have a bowl-full of green chile and some sopaipillas when you’re reading it. Iced tea, also. Too.
guess I ought to read books 2 and 3,now. If found “Girl with the dragon Tattoo” a heck of a page-turner, but so violent and depressing I couldn’t bring myself to read the next one, even though I had already bought it.
Yes, fair warning, there’s lots of extreme ugliness in those books. LOTS. But OH the revenge is sweet in Hornet’s Nest.