The Washington Post’s chief apologist/excusemaker, Patrick Pexton was last seen lecturing readers to leave Jennifer Rubin alone when she was being racist as well as reminding them that her racism is a feature and not a bug:
If your politics are liberal and you don’t generally read Rubin, but you read her Norway posts, you probably would be pretty offended. But if you are a conservative, or someone who reads Rubin regularly, you’ll know that this is what she does and who she is.
Since then, I’m sure Pexton has gone back to whatever it is that omsbudsmen do like explaining why Marmaduke was moved to the Style section or something. Hey, it’s a living.
But about two and a half weeks ago the Post re-ran a story from communist red sheet Bloomberg Markets magazine pointing out that the Koch brothers are treasonous corporate criminal douchebags and ever since then one of the Koch Bros. (either Greedor or Grabby Bob, one of them) has been texting the WaPo late at night wondering if they would be willing to run cover for them a little bit as a professional courtesy, you know, one malevolent corporation to another.
Obviously the WaPo agreed and unfortunately for Pexton he drew the short straw but it seems that his heart is not really in it as he starts it off by playing the equivalency card:
The Koch brothers, Charles and David, are the betes noire for liberals, much like George Soros is the bugbear for conservatives.
The Kochs own a multinational conglomerate — regarded as the second-largest privately held company in the world — that makes everything from toilet paper and Lycra to Dixie cups and Stainmaster carpets. They also have massive oil interests, recently bought ethanol plants, deal in derivatives and employ tens of thousands of people worldwide.
The brothers tie for fourth on the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans, with a net worth of $25 billion each. Soros, by the way, is seventh with $22 billion. The conservative-to-libertarian brothers, just like the liberal Soros, spend a great deal of their money to push U.S. politics, government and society in a particular direction through donations to politicians, campaign finance groups and philanthropies.
Of course everyone remembers all the fines and settlements that that George Soros has had to pay out for massive and indiscriminate pollution and death and that selling stuff to Iran thing that Bloomberg wrote about …except that was the Koch brothers. But other than that – still the same.
So, Pexton tries another angle:
It all looks pretty bad, and it is, on many levels. Koch companies paid hundreds of millions of dollars in fines and settlements to resolve these cases, no small change.
But I think The Post erred in republishing this story, or at least in the way it did. And when the Kochs complained to The Post after publication, The Post’s response wasn’t handled well.
Now, I couldn’t find any outright falsehoods in the story that would warrant corrections. Bloomberg, too, has published no corrections. But I think the story lacked context, was tendentious and was unfair in not reporting some of the exculpatory and contextual information Koch provided to Bloomberg.
This is what is known as the “Technically True, And Collectively Nonsense” defense which was imperfected by a certain gawky innumerate but unfortunately has failed to catch on with the general population who are encumbered with antiquated notions of self respect.
So let’s see what else Pexton is going to dump in the toilet next to see if it floats…Hmmmm. Okay, here we go:
In the days immediately after Bloomberg published its story but before The Post republished it, Koch swung its PR machine into action and put up a point-by-point rebuttal on KochFacts.com. The Powerline blog, written by lawyers who defend conservative causes and who have ties to the Kochs, did a deep-dive legal rebuttal of the story. Jennifer Rubin, The Post’s conservative opinion blogger, did a post that quoted Koch General Counsel Mark Holden extensively.
Yeah, lets see… disinterested and impartial Koch PR machine, Rubin stenography, that guy at Powerline. Nope. No sale. Wanna try again?
As Indiviglio and Rubin wrote, lots of companies have foreign subsidiaries that until recently did business with Iran, including GE, Hewlett-Packard and Caterpillar. Many multinational companies have been investigated and prosecuted for violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and been fined and prosecuted for violating clean water and clean air laws.
Are the Kochs worse, better or in the middle? We can’t tell from this story.
Post Business Editor Greg Schneider said he “was aware” before republication that “the piece had stirred up some reaction, but we look to highlight work that is provocative.”
I think newspapers should always be provocative. But they should also be fair and provide context.
Got it.
From this point forward all Washington Post writers, when writing about the Kochs, should provide some sort of ‘baseline’ or ranking system so that the average WaPo reader can appropriately rank them on a Scale of True Evilness (possibly applying the same algorithms developed by the BCS) . I suggest slotting the Koch’s somewhere where it is clearly understood that they are slightly less evil than a pedophile with herpes but they still have a ways to go before they approach the much more civic-minded Mafia.
I think reasonable people will agree that this is fair…
(Image Gus Ruelas/Greenpeace)





45 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Gotta provide context. If I get busted for DWI, I expect the Post to publish the BAL of 100 other randomly selected drivers, for the sake of comparison. If I go on trial for murder, they’ll need their story to include a list of all the murders I’m not accused of.
Those dead tree editions are gonna be bulky.
Indeed, this whole relativism thing gets awkward pretty fast. Apparently, all things need to be placed on the new Pexton scale of relative dickishness. So, if the WaPo were to point out that Cantor and McConnell are exacerbating the recession by refusing to do anything to get the country back to work, we should be sure to point out that they could, in fact, be making things worse by reinstating slavery or slaughtering the unemployed for spare parts.
“the much more civic-minded Mafia.”
You have to read the entire post to put that into context and when you do, Bamm! “A” list snark on a Monday morning. Round of snaps for Mssr. Bogg.
Nah, can’t use the BCS system. It’ll ignore all the evilness coming from the west coast and those unaffiliated schemers who don’t perpetrate their deeds on national television.
Does Pexton kiss his wife with that mouth? And, please, the Kochs rank right between the pedophile with herpes and a pedophile without herpes.
In the old days, a reporter would be fired for writing a puff piece for money. Now, the editor takes the money an assigns a reporter.
Boxturtle (In the old days, most reporters would quit rather than take that assignment)
And a certain Midwest affiliate would get way too much credit.
Great article, thank you. You have restored my faith in humanity for the moment. Better than dick cancer..love it. I have this fantasy sometimes about firedoglake becoming a mainstream news channel on cable TV. I can just see you talking about this topic on air…wonderful. It’s a beautiful fantasy. News would become both relevant, realistic, and entertaining. I think the networks are really missing out not taking advantage of this missed market opportunity.
Perhaps the heart of the matter. Stenographers are hired by the 1% to be “provocative”… not that long ago, real journalists – and Pexton btw doesn’t fit into the definition of “real journalist” – generally at least *tried* to be objective and report facts.
Clearly those days are long gone. And yes, the Mafia is way more civic-minded than the greedy scurrilous pernicious lying Koch brothers & their other upper 1% ilk.
I think newspapers should always be provocative. But they should also be fair and provide context.
Puleeze! Pexton’s predecessor, Little Deborah Howell practically invented the “both sides do it” meme in her unblushing defense of Abramhoff.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/21/AR2006012100907.html
At the Post an “ombudsman” is just a tenured right-wing partisan hack who needs to be put someplace so they can still draw a paycheck. They obviously have no clue what the postition really entails.
I summarily reject any argument to the effect that the Koch brothers are not worse than dick cancer.
It’s depressingly telling about the state of modern Journanimalism that Pexton thinks it’s “provocative” to actually, you know, write about stuff that’s true. Or at least write true things about members of the oligarchy who could buy and sell your sorry little ink stained hands 100 times over.
Is it just me or does it seem that these “The other side does it too” arguments are getting stale? By the end of the Bush administration it seemed that the tried and true methods of bashing the left as un-american traitors that had been used so effectively for years had finally stopped working. The American people had finally awakened to the realization that it was bullshit.
Now it seems like these methods of protecting one side by claiming equal evilness by the other side that have worked so well for years is wearing thin to the point of no longer working either. As with the previous attempts to control the narrative, I believe that this too no longer convinces anybody.
What the Koch brothers do is pretty much dick cancer and every other part of the body cancer many times over.
Man….I got a good laugh out of this one. Seriously, I mean it. Agree with all of the points in article. The press should NOT have to defend factual reporting and it is their job to do so. If Mr. Smithers (from the Simposons) doesn’t like it, well who cares? They only care when Mr. Smithers owns the paper.
We need to find a hotter place than hell for their final destination.
C. Montgomery Burns is who you are thinking of. Smithers is his bootlicking toady, which perfectly describes the job of the WaPo’s ombudsman.
good one!
As I see it, they are finding that place for themselves. I just don’t want them to take us with them.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4182/is_20010808/ai_n10147107/
And so it goes. Corporations routinely calculate the cost of wrongful death suits as a cost of doing business. What’s a life worth? Not much, in their view.
Seeing as how dick cancer affects less than 1% of men and the survival rate is aroung 50%, I’m thinking that the Koch brothers are worse than dick cancer. Their “ruined life rate” is probably higher. And, dick cancer is far less pompous and smug. I fear that you have probably insulted dick cancer by comparing it to the Kochs.
I think they do, otherwise they wouldn’t be trying to subvert it so comprehensively and turn it into the ombudstoady.
Nice.
Thourally sick is how I’d characterize it.
realitychecker, I’ve read your contributions here at FDL for a while and just want to make sure to tell you thanks…. So, thanks.
Thank you, wordplay, very gracious and much appreciated. And, back at you, friend, I was very impressed with your commentary yesterday. I don’t recall seeing your handle before, but obviously you are not a newbie. I do hope to see much more of you in future.
Which — please do correct me, Mr. Pexton, if this is too provocative a fact for you — makes that sort of blood libel payment deliciously tax deductible for Koch, Inc. Essentially, “we the people” end up subsidizing the very same criminal business practices that are killing us.
That’s not news, of course, but it’s interesting to see that, in the self-righteous eyes of the WaPo, it ought to be reported along the lines of: “The Koch brothers showed remarkable restraint by not simply shooting these teenagers for sport. Indeed, their payment (albeit after a decade of foot dragging and outright denial of culpability) of a significantly reduced fine for the unnecessary death of a young kid surely shows that they’re at least as compassionate as the Sunshine & Ponies Foundation, which gave about the same amount of money to teenage causes in the same fiscal year…”
Congratulations. You’ve succeeded in making me feel guilty about my unfair treatment of dick cancer.
TB, you’re apparently getting a bit soft when pups such as myself call you on your leniency ; )
x2
By George, I think you’ve got it. We have a terrible problem with the cognitive dissonance between our national mythologies, and the realities of ongoing practices. We claim to place a supremely high value on life, but every corporate product or service poses some risk to life, and the calculations are coldly made whether the expected profit margin will justify the predicted expense of the wrongful death suits that result. Nobody ever focuses on this, of course, just as we do not bother to focus on the “collateral damage” of our military efforts.
Sorry, my #27 was meant in reply to Longjourney at #21. I guess my guilt made my eyes go funny lol.
Beelzebub is the bete noire (French for “UBG”) of the IslamoChristianists, much like Jesus is the bugbear for Satanists. Now, sure, Satan has been accused of all manner of nasty things, but the Satanists have said many bad things about Jesus as well. Both sides attempt to advance their relative causes through conversion (some would say “brainwashing”), “voluntary donations” and evangelism (which some call recruitment by threats). I fact-checked over some of the many bad things which have been attributed to The Prince of Darkness over the years, and although I could find no outright falsehoods in any of the stories that would warrant a correction, I think it’s important to note that the stories lack context, are usually tendentious and are unfair in not reporting some of the exculpatory and contextual information which Satan has provided to anyone who will listen.
I swear, every time I see an image of those Koch brothers I think of “Trading Places.”
“Money isn’t everything, Mortimer.”
“Oh, grow up.”
“Mother always said you were greedy.”
“She meant it as a compliment.”
But if you are a conservative, or someone who reads Rubin regularly, you’ll know that this is what she does and who she is.
And there you have it. This is beyond IOIYAR. This is “It’s okay if this is what you do and this is who you are. (IOITIWYDATIWYA).”
With this we reach the reductio ad absurdum of right-wing/WaPo casuistry. “Yes, we publish lies, half-truths, defenses of swine, misleading analyses, exculpations-via-false-equivalencies, and sheer outright crap. But why do you object? This is what we do and this is who we are.”
The Koch brothers are evil on a scale that has yet to be invented. Their drive for wealth and their lack of morals in attaining it just shows how evil they really are. The devil now has a name and it is Charles. In the future I see a long line forming to piZZ on their graves.
“Your Honor, I will stipulate my client did blow up that busload of nuns. But you must consider that this is what he does and who he is, and therefore dismiss the charges.”
The example I always remember is the airlines. Most commercial airline deaths are caused by asphyxiation, not crashes. All the plastics are highly toxic when burning. There is a chemical that can be added to jet fuel that will let the fuel burn only when under pressure. So if a fuel tank is ruptured, the jet fuel will not ignite. The only problem is that is costs a penny per gallon of fuel. The airline industry calculated that it would be cheaper to pay off the wrongful-death lawsuits than it would be to add the chemical. Fuckers.
And so it goes.
Hey! Anyone remember why the towers fell? The jet fuel burning at a high temperature caused the structural steel to weaken.
Hey, you got a problem with that? Commie. ;-)
If WaPo was REALLY paying attention they would realize that the Koch defenders have given them leads on three other pro-Iranian, anti-American companies: GE,Caterpillar, HP.
Maybe Bloomberg can do their work for them and investigate those companies, too.
I would be happy to see Bloomberg investigate GE, HP & Catepillar for their pro-Iranian, allegedly Anti-American business deals. I’m sure that there are quite a few other putatively “United States” corporations that could be investigated as well. Why stop there? Go for it, Bloomberg, you COMMIE subversive!
But if you are a conservative, or someone who reads Rubin regularly, you’ll know that this is what she does and who she is.
And that makes it okay!
:: wild laughter from beyond the footlights ::
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, you’ve been a great audience! Good night!
But, but…. they support teh Dance!
Pexton’s copy editor missed that when “betes” is plural so should be the adjective: “betes noires,” not “betes noir.”
Just a little pet peeve of mine….
The Kochs have been extra touchy and speedy with the overwhelming response ever since that New Yorker article outed them for their heavy support of extreme right wing causes. They tried to get that article spiked before it was published, and it was fairly well known that they (especially Charles) much preferred to be anonymous with their political activities.
Too bad, so sad; we all know who you bastards are now!
Leave Jennifer Rubin ALOOOOOOOOOONE!
Or at least leave her far away. Very far away. That Antarctic research station they had to airlift the scientist from a few weeks back ought to do it.