
Muslim-hating WaPo bigot-blogger Jennifer Rubin is obviously very displeased with President Obama (what else is new?) because he has the audacity to want to withdraw the troops from Iraq before we have had the opportunity to drain all the oil that lies beneath the sand and kill all the people who live above it. To buttress her case she invokes the Father, the Son, and The Holy Roller of the Republican Presidential-wannabe field (Romney, Perry, and Bachmann) and also Rick Santorum (whose arguments are generally considered frothy at best and slippery at worst). Additionally she supports her case for continued empire with an appeal to authority citing Kimbery Kagan’s Institute for the Study of Wars That Best Serve The Interests of Israel. Again, nothing surprising there.
But what is least of all surprising is Rubin’s tacit admission that the Republican Clown Car of Candidates is still lacking in that old genocidal can-do spirit as indicated by her hope for a shining knight who will ride out of the mists to save America from the Muslim horde by hopefully conducting all war/all the time:
Once again we see how critical a commander in chief is to the successful creation and implementation of national security policy. But that doesn’t mean Congress is powerless. It should immediately commence oversight hearings and call all of the appropriate witnesses, including former defense secretary Robert Gates, Panetta and the negotiating team that had been dispatched to Iraq. And one more figure, I think, would be required: Gen. David Petraeus.
It might be interesting to get his assessment of the Iraqi security situation from his current vantage point at the CIA. But the main reason for calling him would be to get a valuable assessment from the most knowledgable person on the planet about the security requirements in Iraq, the level of troops required and the expectation of the military that we would have an ongoing presence. His great achievement, and America’s victory, hang in the balance. And, if he should find himself just a wee bit disgusted with the conduct of the administration, he can always resign. I hear there is an election heating up. Petraeus-Ryan? Petraeus-Rubio?
These people really hate Mitt Romney.
(Image courtesy of Phil Ebersole)




37 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
How ’bout Patraeus-Tebow?
In other Islamophobe news, the “Rev.” Terry Jones’ slide into irrelevancy appears to be complete:
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_8cb207f4-fe48-11e0-9c76-0019bb30f31a.html
He drew a total of FIFTEEN people to a rally in Cape Girardeau, MO, Rush Limbaugh’s home town. The room was set up for up to 500 attendees. I bet the fifteen all hated Mitt Romney also.
I think a lot of repubes are going to be at the booth casting their ballot thinking “shit, isn’t there anyone else but Romney?”
Was that loud sound I heard earlier Patrick Pexton smacking his head against his desk?
Eh? Maybe Jennifer Rubin is, uh, ?? “saner” than she first appears. Seems like she finds the entire “field” of nutbar lunatics putatively running for the GOP Primary to be as distasteful & dissatisfying & stupifying as the sane members of our populace find them. Who’da thunk it??
Of course, Rubin’s suggested “solution” to this TeaGOPer problem knocks her back into the “Insane” column once again. Phew… the world continues to spin on its axis.
Interesting to watch the “counter-attack” develop along the lines of Obama is not fit to be CIC. Rubin knows the GOP can’t win on substance (think of the images next year of GIs coming home to families for Chrismas, children laughing, wives joyfully crying). The Republican desperation is palpable.
Obama’s got “I ended the war in Iraq,” “I got Osama,” “I got Gaddafi,” “I saved GM,” “I provided health care to millions.” “Now, give me back a Congress, and I’ll provide jobs.”
Petraeus as savior, huh? We’ll see how that plays out. But if he’s as smart as Rubin thinks he is, the General ain’t about to start driving the clown car that is today’s Republican party.
On topic: Even Pat Robertson realizes there’s a little too much drooling going on.
Slightly off-topic: Tebow & his new friend!
Here you go:
http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=waiting+for+superman+flaming+lips
Given the, well, history of the 20th century, I’d tend to be leery about putting military leaders in civilian command, but who am I to tell J-Rube what to do? It’s not like she’ll be affected by the outcome either way.
I hear that they’ve doubled the guard at Reagan’s grave site. Anyone with a shovel is to be shot on sight.
Not after this – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/24/tim-tebow-denver-bronco-gay-kiss_n_1028621.html
O/T but the
squirrelly weaselsmanagement at NPR have backed away from their backing away from firing Lisa Simeone — now they’re going to let WDAV syndicate the show to NPR stations but it’s not an NPR show, no sirree, it’s a WDAV show that happens to take up some of the NPR airtime. TBogg woz right!PS It seems they snuck this news out on Friday, presumably hoping I (personally) wouldn’t notice. And I nearly didn’t. Pfui.
What really struck me about that video was not so much Juicebox’s powerful man-crush on a fellow man, but how relieved the Fins were to remain in the Suck-for-Luck conversation.
Patraeus/Chuck Norris 2012!!!!1!
NPR is so conflict adverse, you’d swear it was an abused step-child.
Now even the potential of a bunch of basement-dwelling, Cheeto-swilling bloggers accusing them of, OMFG, liberal bias, is enough to get them to roll over immediately. Apparently if you either (1) beat that dog often enough, or (2) pack that board with righties, all it takes to have NPR snap to attention is a dog whistle. Shame; it used to a decent network.
(think of the images next year of GIs coming home to families for Chrismas, children laughing, wives joyfully crying).” — I’d say that’s got to be about 98.4% of the rationale behind the pull-out. It’s not like we “won” or “lost” at this point in time…
Sadly, of course, many of them will be coming home to face the sticky question of: “now that I’m done killing other people’s kids for Uncle Sam’s cash, what the fuck am I supposed to do for a livin’ next?” Unfortunately, for all of us, but particularly for himself as he faces re-election, Obama’s not going to be able to pull an answer to that stumper out of his ass with some fancy stage management and theatrics.
America needs you
Ronald Reagan
Ronnie could you please come home
Things are looking bad
I know you would be mad
To see what kind of men
Prevail upon the land you love
America’s wondering
How we got here
Ronnie all we get is lies
We got a Muslim president
That’s taking all our dough
And going it to those
Who sell out all our christian values.
With tremendous apologies to Chicago
Huh?
I’m visualizing that movie line scene in Annie Hall, only Obama is Alvy Singer, Petraeus is Marshall McLuhan, and the opinionated dither brain is Rubin.
Obama: …aren’t you ashamed to pontificate like that? And the funny part of it is, you don’t know anything about Iraq, the war, or the views of General Petraeus!
Rubin: Oh, really? Well, it just so happens I write a column called “I’m a wingnut and therefore am always right,” so I think my insights into Iraq have a great deal of validity!
Obama: Oh, do ya? Well, that’s funny, because I happen to have General Petraeus right here, so, so, yeah, just let me…
[pulls Petraeus out from behind a nearby column]
Obama: come over here for a second… tell her!
Petraeus: I read what you wrote! You know nothing about the war or my perspective on it! How you got to write a column about anything is totally amazing!
Or something along that line.
TBogg, not only are you funny but you have the greatest commenters.
The Rs hate all their candidates and it’s rather stunning to watch. I thought they would do their usual sheeple thing and fall in line but it’s not happening – apparently.
The most remarkable comment I heard today — and perhaps the most remarkable one I’ve heard in my life — came from Michele Bachmann. She said that Iraq owes us big time because we liberated them and that they should pay us for our missionary benevolence (the latter phrase is mine, not hers), especially seeing as how they’re a rich country and all.
Translation: Now that we’ve bombed them back to the stone age, they should reward us for our selflessness by letting us have all their oil.
There’s scary/weird, there’s very scary/weird, and then there’s Michele Bachmann.
P.S.: I don’t know if it’s just the computer I’m on, T-Bogg, but the typeface is veeeeeeeeeery small, which is hard on my middle-aged eyes, even with glasses (which are progressives, of course).
To buttress her case she invokes the Father, the Son, and The Holy Roller of the Republican Presidential-wannabe field (Romney, Perry, and Bachmann) and also Rick Santorum
We can only hope that more GOPers get on the bandwagon given the polling for support for the war the more the GOP goes pro war the better it is for us.
If O had any brains he would withdraw troops from Afghanistan before the election, cut military spending even more and tell Americans he wants to use the money to create good paying jobs.
That is if he had brains heck if O did that he would win by a landslide and the GOP would be stuck defending more war a very unpopular position.
Ask Michelle if she would dare drive a car from one end of Bagdad to the other no bullet proof vest no armed escort then ask her if Iraq’s should pay us:). MarkfromIreland can set it up for her.
Ask Mitt how much is he willing to go into debt to pay for enough troops to make Iraq safe to drive through without a bullet proof vest and armed escort.
We know that Mitt won’t raise taxes on the rich to pay for it so Mitt and friends are arguing for increased taxes to pay for the war as Americans lose their homes and jobs.
Petraeus-Ryan? Petraeus-Rubio?
Has she seen the numbers Ryan has Nationally Mitt has a better shot at winning over the Fundies in the GOP primary. Rubio is Hispanic the anti immigrant racists will stay home rather than vote with him on the ticket.
10 years of failure at war and Petraeus is the best war hero the GOP can find? Don’t you have to win a war not help lose the longest most expensive wars we ever fought if you expect to win the Presidency?
The GOP can brag about Petraeus all they want in the end we are still in Iraq 10 years later and we still have not won the war.
If Petraeus runs Obama will have no choice but to attack Petraeus’s record every film of American troops bombing civilians will start getting tons of clicks on u tube as voters check his record.
If Petraeus runs the anti war movement will get a huge boost of support after that.
So Petraeus-Ryan? Petraeus-Rubio? Yeah! they won’t get my vote but I welcome them to the race:)
So Petraeus quits. What then? Seven days in May?
But he didn’t “want” to withdraw the troops. He actively fought against it, in fact.
Petraeus was certainly a consideration for the GOP nominee, and they would have danced naked to have him, given the goat rodeo…
But he opted for the sure thing at the CIA, and, no republican OR democrat is going to eplace him, for a long, long, time. As a fairly young and healthy man, he and his pentagon-climber worldview are going to be Obama’s gift to us that keeps on giving. Methinks we’ll be talking about “Director Petraeus” for many moons.
This lady is dangerous when she gets her stream-of-consciousness thing going. If you are a conservative teapublican, you like this reparations idea, but then you realize “wait…did she just suggest that the USG get into the oil business and compete against private business? Forget that trillion dollars us taxpayers spent in our hostile takeover of Iraqi National Oil – we can’t bloody well allow our federal government to compete with the free goddam market.”
Of course, Iraq is now signing contracts with just about everyone except us for the oil. We could have saved a trillion dollars and just bought the socialist oil from the Iraqis…but we couldn’t have the people of Iraq benefiting from the petrodollars (or petroeuro’s)…no, we needed to make sure that the stockholders of Exxon, BP, et al had their god-given right to dividends protected. God bless Big Oil.
“…because he has the audacity to want to withdraw the troops from Iraq before we have had the opportunity to drain all the oil that lies beneath the sand and kill all the people who live above it.”
Sorry, while this statement isn’t meant to be the focus of your critique, it feels to me that your criticism of “bigot-blogger Jennifer Rubin” (yes she is!) serves to mask the deeper, and in my thinking, way more destructive actions of Obama. Withdrawing “the troops” does not equal leaving Iraq, draining all the oil and killing all the people who live above it.
Well, Towner, while withdrawing “The Troops” might not end the killing of Iraqi citizens, I don’t think the spanking new 5,000 member State Department mercenary force will be able to finish that job. We’ve seen how effective the mercenaries can be in Iraq when they start shooting at people who can shoot back. And I tend to think that the overall Profit, FIRST! mentality of corporations extends to the mercenary companies as well: upper management will get evac’ed as the lower-paid good old boys get left holding the bag with a big I.O.U. on the ammo locker.
And I think that you should properly refer to “The Obama” rather than just “Obama”. It lessens the fear we should feel for the ursurper.
Did the GOP field forget the whole purple finger thing? I kinda recall they thought it was a pretty big deal at the time.
Obama would be more than happy to continue the forever war there, if it weren’t for those darn purple finger elected Iraqis demanding that any american forces in Iraq be legally liable if/when they do any illegal things there.
What do the Rubins of the right want, a Diem style do-over? Cause it worked out so well last time.
Yep. We lost the moment Bush walked (bushwacked?) into Iraq. But whatever the reason Obama got the troops out, I’m okay with that for purely selfish personal reasons. I have two sons who will be draft age before too long. At least the chances of them dying in Iraq just went down a little.
I think it was Charlie Pierce who wrote about the economic realities facing those troops as they come home. Along with those happy images I described we’ll also see more shots of unemployment lines, foreclosures, and toops dealing with disfigurement, PTSD, suicide, etc.
“Tell everybody waiting for Superman
That they should try to hold on best they can
He hasn’t dropped them, forgot them, or anything
It’s just too heavy for Superman to lift”
Indeed.
Yeah, they like elections up to and until “their guy” doesn’t win. Then it’s obvious that the masses didn’t know what they were doing, or the elections were rigged (irony alert!), and the best option would be to “correct” the clearly flawed process using overwhelming force.
No need to worry about the draft. Lack of jobs will provide plenty of volunteers for years to come!
I hear that they’ve doubled the guard at Reagan’s grave site. Anyone with a shovel is to be
shot on sightaccorded all possible courtesies.Fixt.