Asked about the fate of the Department of Education in a potential Romney administration, the former governor suggested it would also face a dramatic restructuring.
“The Department of Education: I will either consolidate with another agency, or perhaps make it a heck of a lot smaller. I’m not going to get rid of it entirely,” Romney said, explaining that part of his reasoning behind preserving the agency was to maintain a federal role in pushing back against teachers’ unions. Romney added that he learned in his 1994 campaign for Senate that proposing to eliminate the agency was politically volatile.
At that time, Sen. Ted Kennedy ran ads against Romney — then a political neophyte — accusing him of being uncaring for saying he wished to eliminate the agency.
Romney told the audience here tonight (along with the Weekly Standard in an interview in early April) that that experience remains fresh in his mind. It’s contributed to his caution in publicly naming federal agencies and programs he would eliminate or dramatically curtail.
Calculating and cynical!
Mrs. Romney acknowledged Republicans’ deficit at present with female voters, and urged the women in attendance to talk to their friends, particularly about the economy. She also discussed the criticism she faced this week, and her pride in her role as a mother.
“It was my early birthday present for someone to be critical of me as a mother, and that was really a defining moment, and I loved it,” Mrs. Romney said.
Meanwhile, the face of common salt-of-the-Earth American stay-at-home moms gets a well-deserved respite from ironing/vacuuming/doing the laundry/picking up after the kids:
Yes, that was First Lady hopeful Ann Romney on Worth Avenue Saturday, looking very Palm Beach-y in her hot pink tunic and jeans with her shoulder-length blond hair. The only thing missing was the Helga Wagner necklace.
Mitt’s missus spent four hours with Alfred Fiandaca, her old pal from Boston who closed the store for her so she could shop in peace without any worries about paparazzi grabbing a shot of her in the fitting room. Trying on a little something to wear to tonight’s big dinner at Darlene and Jerry Jordan’s house, perhaps? When they’re paying 50k a couple, a lady wants to look good.
The private shopping went well for the wife of the presumptive candidate — c’mon, like that’s not a given by now — but for the customers who had “Stop by Alfred’s” at the top of their Saturday to-do list, well, not so much. They had to wait. Some did, patiently and quietly. Others did, not so patiently and not so quietly.
Finally, Ann strolled out, shopping bags in hand, smiled at the small crowd gathered on the sidewalk, climbed into the big black car waiting at the curb, and drove off.





50 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Could this woman possibly be more of a gift?
“Look at that, she IS like other moms. All moms get to shop privately accompanied by the owner of a Palm Beach boutique.
I would certainly go to Ann Romney for information on how American women are negotiating the economy, she’s definitely the average woman.
Mitt’s right again!
Joseph Bua
12:36 PM, 4/16/2012″
I’m watching the Red Sox game right now and Mitt’s huge goofy noggin is parked a couple of rows behind the plate.
Now he’s ruining baseball.
I’m going to probably eliminate for high income people the second home mortgage deduction,” Romney said, adding that he would also likely eliminate deductions for state income and property taxes as well.
My guess is the percentage of ‘high income’ people he is targeting by eliminating the second home mortgage deduction that actually have mortgages on their second (and third and fourth) homes is quite small.
Which leads to this garble:
“By virtue of doing that, we’ll get the same tax revenue, but we’ll have lower rates,” Romney explained. “The nice thing about lower rates is that small businesses not get to keep a larger share of what they’re earning and plow it back in to hire more people and expand their business.”
So, the tax revenue will be the same, but there will be lower rates? If the tax revenue is the same, aren’t they paying the same amount in total taxes, just calculating it differently? But wait, business will also keep more money (somehow) and start hiring people that they don’t need.
To steal from Atrios, we are ruled by the truly stupid and insane.
Sometimes the private shopping hasn’t gone so well?
Damn you for ruining my Monday!
Somehow “let them eat cake” is just not a strong enough statement for these people.
So I suppose if someone asked her what she knows about fashion her response would be that she knows owners of fashion labels.
That’s just like my life! Well, almost.
Yes, that was
First Lady hopeful Ann RomneySusan of Texas in Houston Saturday, looking veryPalm Beach-ytired and hot in herhot pink tunicSnorgtee shirt and jeans with her shoulder-lengthblondbrown hair. The only thing missing was theHelga Wagner necklacehomemade jewlery.Mitt’s missusShe spent four hourswith Alfred Fiandaca, her old pal from Bostonat the dry cleaner, grocery store and discount bakery whoclosed the store for her so she could shop in peace without any worries about paparazzi grabbing a shot of her in the fitting roomignored her. Trying on a little something to wear to tonight’s big dinner atDarlene and Jerry Jordan’sher own house, perhaps? When they’repaying 50k a couplecoupon clipping, a lady wants to look good.Finally,
Annshe strolled out, shopping bags in hand, smiled at thesmall crowd gathered on the sidewalkcar waiting to take her parking spot, climbed into thebig black car waiting at the curbthrid-world compact car, and drove off.We stay-at-home mothers are all alike.
Heh, brilliant.
We usually also include a stop at Ross (you know, dress for less) because we’re all elitist and shit.
How could I have forgotten Ross, Mervyn’s, and TJMaxx? Plus we have a kick-ass Goodwill that keeps me in Liz Claiborne sporty separates.
Actually they are not stupid and insane. They know exactly what they are doing, they just think we are too stupid to notice or figure it out for ourselves(alas, that assumption is true for about 25% of the population).
After all, in their insulated world, if we were as smart as they are, then we would be rich also.
When Romney talks about the 2nd house deduction, you know that there will be some loop hole ensuring that it only applies to the plebeian home owners.
1. 27%, not 25%.
2. Fine, eliminate the 2nd-home deduction, just don’t touch the 3rd-, 4th-, 5-th and ski-lodge ones. Don’t you know how many jobs those occasional dwellings create? And sustainable ones too, mostly for the linguistically challenged — if they don’t require gardeners, they do need snow clearance (and vice versa), not to mention the interior maintenance, swimming pools, stables, etc.
I was thinking “Let them eat schadenfruede!”, it’s a bit early for “Let them eat lead!”
How dare you, Sir! How dare you! Have you at last no shame? That may be the most brutally unfair thing you have ever done; worse even than not posting a ‘Shakira’s Ass’ ([homer]argleargleargleargleargle[/homer]) gif one Friday. Imagine comparing (even if only implicitly) that smarmy toad Romney to one of the great human and humanitarian millionaires, Thurston Howell III. Howell had principles; Howell had class, and Howell had style and the mellifluous, orotund tones of Jim Backus (RIP); not to mention the superlative support of that Rich Man’s Woman, Mrs. “Lovey” Howell. None of that ridiculous, showy “Ann Romney-style” exhibitionism for Lovey. She knew that her place was firmly in the background (or slightly behind at one side, in formal portraits). “Complement, not compete” was her motto, and who among us can but admiringly agree? Compared to the Howells, the Romneys look like a pair who got rich selling used cars; and the Gingriches look like trailer trash. Come to think of it, compared to the Clampetts, they still look like trailer trash.
Is this the first time you’ve used Thurston and Lovey to illustrate a Romney post? It seems so natural.
Romney never said anything about 3rd, 4th, etc. homes, they will still be exempt. Everybody knows that Romney means what he says and says what he means.
Only 2nd homes will lose the deduction, and the way he’ll get around that is to declare the servant’s quaters as his 2nd home.
Is there a competition for cluelessness going on that the electorate is just not being made aware of? I just got through reading that Romney is choosing the same economic advisor that W had. Yeah Romney, go ahead and talk THAT up. I’m sure everyone has forgotten that W actually presided when the collapse happened.
As for Ann, she lost all her brownie points when her husband said that poor women should be forced to work outside of the home. If stay at home momming is good enough work and dignified for Ann then it ought to be good enough work for those at the bottom of the economic ladder. I don’t get into the two sets of rules, one for the monied class and one for those without.
It is Obama’s fault that Republican Bullshit* can still be successfully peddled in 2012.
*tax cuts create jobs, government cannot create jobs, tax relief makes “job creators” happy so they hire more people, Tax Cuts encourage investment, Unemployment is caused by excessive Federal Income Taxes, The biggest problem faced by the unemployed is excessive Federal Income Taxes…
…If only Corporations could just “let those puppies breathe” without Federal Interference (Clean Air and Water Regulations) they would hire millions of Americans, etc.
(Obama believes most of this shit, himself.)
It’s a dumocracy according to wikipedia.
The upper middle class and above do not currently have a state and property tax deduction. The alternate minimum tax (AMT)requires these tax payers to calculate an AMT which does not allow one to include any write off for state or property taxes.
Thus, Willard’s proposal to eliminate the state and proeperty tax write-off only applies to middle and lower incomes.
i.e. He shifting more of the tax burden from the well off to middle and lower incomes. Kinda of like he did when flipping businesses.
Daddy shrub is backing the Rom, of course him, his buddies and their money will do the picking, even VP, for him.
People were saying and believing that shit since at least 1980, about 28 years before O’bama became President.
How could it be all his fault that some people still believe this nonsense in 2012? Did he use the name Laffer as pseudonym to develop his theorey of Supply Side Economics decades ago? Was he a secret advisor to the Republican Party, Hoover, Reagan, Bush I and Bush II administrations?
Maybe he used his Time Machine to set all this in motion at the same time he dropped that forged Birth Certificate into the Live Birth File Cabinet in the Hawaiian State House.
I’m sure that Romney has someone rewriting that so as to put a good spin on it. After all, cake is good!
That is priceless!
NOw that’a little unfair. I hear the Romneys know LOTS of people who OWN many shopping centers of which several have a Goodwill store in them.
Must be nice to wake up in the morning, the only worry on your mind is something like this: “if I fly across the country to ride a horse at one of my other homes, will I be able to get back in time to dress for dinner?”
I’m pretty certain that behind that sweet smile is a truly cold-hearted bi*ch.
I agree. Didn’t McCain have SEVEN homes. 3 through 9 SHOULD retain their deductibility.
That’s Thurston Howell and Lovey???????? I hadn’t noticed.
Agree 100%. Obama is going to the REASON Romney gets elected if he does.
Marco Rubio already has the gig. Trust me.
Hey, don’t forget, she has to decide which of her
Cadillacs she’ll drive today, OR will she just take the Bently and let the chauffeuer drive. When you ARE a “job creator” you must lean to the latter.
You REALIZE that if you have FOUR homes, you have to have FOUR big screen, high-def TV’s?
All it takes is one high pitch and they’re stuck with the pope wannabe again.
Arthur Laffer testified in Nashville today that the only thing keeping Tennessee from forging ahead on the jobs front is its estate and gift tax. It’s like an attack on the cream of the cream of the job creators, he said, adding that Tennessee has lost 200,000 jobs in the last 10 years as a result of this vicious tax.
Can I leave now?
yes, but our problem is that that 25% are the ones most likely to vote.They may be ignorant, but,man, they are dedicated.
Don’t you know Ann got those two Cadillacs selling Mary Kay?
This is just the Republican version of “noun, verb, 9/11,” except that they’ve substituted “lower taxes,” or one other of those ridiculous buzz-words/buzz-phrases they employ.
Cold as ice. Each ‘son’ ending up with a lifetime of payback.
Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
And they can be countered at the Polls if the other 73% doesn’t stay at home. Like they did in 2010.
Yes, BUT . . .
Obama [and the Dems he's sat on and told to shut up "or else"] have provided NO push-back to this lunacy; and
Obama himself believes this crap, since it was first peddled by his Saint Ronnie.
The majority of the Dem’s have been spineless on this topic since St. Ronnie, for 28 years before O’bama was President. He doesn’t need to sit on them, they were never going to push-back.
If anything these imaginary pusher-backers of yours, would in reality be the ones woking the saws on any political limbs O’bama choose to go out on.
Do you have any quotes or writings from O’bama where he has spoken in favor of the Laffer Curve and/or says that “Trickle On Economics” is the way to go? I am interested in seeing you support your statement.
Barry Oilbummer: “Government Cannot Create Jobs”.
That’s a direct quote. First off, it’s a lie. Secondly, it’s not a long trip to trickledown and deregulation from that statement.
Romney/Fred Thompson 2012!
I blame Obama if
Baby BrideJeri can’t shop Ann into themarbledirt….When and where did he say it?
Here are the remarks which hackworth 1 selectively edited.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/27/remarks-president-signing-small-business-jobs-act
Thanks for digging up that September 2010 speech by BHO. I didn’t read through the entire thing, nor the next citation I’ll link and excerpt (below). From your link, I think this is the key paragraph, vis-a-vis this discussion:
In a December 2011 speech to Kansas high school students, he gave a somewhat detailed speech that covered a number of issues. Here’s a relevant bit from that (bolding is mine):
Gosh golly, sounds like he’s been pretty consistent over this time frame. Has he said something greatly different recently, and in a consistent manner (i.e., not a one-off due to carelessness, weariness, etc.)?
Perhaps his true crime is nuance. We know the press hates that – makes for complex stories that are difficult to dramatize and use to rile up folks. It’s too bad when folks whose incomes aren’t threatened by nuance seem to reject/ignore it anyway, when it is so very much called for in any honest and substantive discussion.
You gotta remember that us po’ folks are stayin’ home on the gov’t dime.
We good Americants won’t let that shit continue.
Yeah, I loved that little tidbit. That deduction is not peanuts to the kind of people he was talking to — it’s peanut DUST (at most). But for most of us ordinary homeowners, it makes a real difference to our tax bills.
Kick the middle class in the gut while cutting the top rate for your buddies. Yeah, that’s Mitt’s idea of “closing loopholes.”
The man’s a turd in a tuxedo.
I assumed that the Hacker was taking stuff out of context, that’s why I asked for the citation.
If O’bama were a supply side hack he would have just extended the Bush tax cuts without getting anything in return. Whether or not he got enough in return is a legitimate debate, but just saying there is no difference between him and Romney/the Republicans is BS.
the only thing keeping Tennessee from forging ahead on the jobs front is its estate and gift tax.
Tennessee taxes gopher meat and lead? ‘Cause that’s about the only “estate” most of ‘em are ever gonna get.
~ Harry R. Sohl
Only money and molotov cocktails gets ya that kind of service.