
Not to dump on her since it was her producer who seems to have blown it, but…
So who was the Bright Young Up-and-Coming Journalism Star at CNN who reported the Supreme Court’s ACA decision first but unfortunately reported it wrong? Yeah, that would be #10 on The Hill’s Most Beautiful People for 2011, Kate Bouldan. Let’s see how she explains journalisming:
Kate Bolduan is happy to dissuade anyone who thinks television news is nothing but glamour.
The CNN correspondent says the congressional beat has been basically nonstop since she got to Capitol Hill a couple of months ago, with first the scandal erupting around former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) and then the debt-ceiling showdown.
“There’s definitely never a dull moment,” Bolduan says. “It’s been, boom, one big story after another.
“It’s sort of like Murphy’s Law,” she says. “If you think nothing’s going to happen, something usually will.”
With all the running around, Bolduan jokes that she sometimes barely has a spare moment to get herself ready to go on camera — or, as she jokingly puts it, to throw on the uniform and the mask.
“I think the viewers cut us some slack,” the Indiana native says. “If it comes down to making one final phone call or putting on lipstick, I’ll make that one final phone call every time.”
Actually, Murphy’s Law states that: “Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong”.
I bet she understands it better now.




22 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
CNN: Wrong and Hawt Reporting is Still Hawt!
I’m trying to hide my amusement at teh right wingers telling me that they must impugne General Holder’s conduct because there were ‘A BUNCH OF DEAD MEXICANS’ as a result of teh stupid gun thingey.
Like when did wingers ever, ever care about dead or alive Mexicans? Ever?
Well, the Supremes killing the individual mandate is “sort of like” them upholding the individual mandate, just in reverse. So she was sort of right.
Why is CNN still in existence? Anyone? Bueller?
Least common denominator. Other than ‘Fox’ of course.
Well, when they were all getting their heads cut off in Arizona… Gov. “Shake Your Finger” seemed to care greatly then…
Only in that she couldn’t incarcerate them in her fee-for-profit local prisons. Otherwise – not so much.
She was misquoted referring to Murphy Brown’s Law. You non-journalists wouldn’t know about that.
Who will jarabe tapatío with Ann Romney’s Mexican-hat-dancing pony? Who’s tears will quench Mitt’s Beaucarnea pliabilis’ thirst? Guatemalans? Guatemalans??
It is kind of funny that Fox got it wrong too, but nobody is really calling them out because, uhh, they’re not really a news organization.
My sources say she’s hearing-colored-impaired (HCI, please donate!) and was actually referencing Lewis Black’s Law…
Costa Ricanos perhaps. Pas de Mejicanos. Solamente en Arizona y Nuevo Mexico! Si si puedes!
Murphy was an optimist.
Oh, and this has to be one of the best political photographs of the last half century.
At least FOX is amusing.
You can’t really blame FOX. After all it worked in 2000.
Reading her TweetPic caption now, I wonder how many adjectives are between “The” and “man” when she complains to her bosses about her producer. He really done her wrong. No one expects anyone as hot as she is to be able to read, in cable news.
Murphy’s New Law: “If you can fuck it up, you will.”
It’s the soft bigotry of no expectations.
Guess Bolduan is finding it hard to put lipstick on that Murphy’s pig of a dead-wrong newscast.
Way to go Completely Noxious Nonsense!
Well, she said that it was “sort of like” Murphy’s Law, so I giver her a pass. Plus she’s hot.
Like when did wingers ever, ever care about dead or alive Mexicans? Ever?
I keep telling people, it’s the “toilet paper strategy,” giving a shit about women and minorities Over There so they don’t have to give a shit here.