
I have had many conversations among friends and family as to exactly why Willard Mitt “Mitt” Romney wants to be President of these here United States. We’ll leave aside for the moment the daddy issues; trying to attain what his dad George Romney could not, since George W. used up every scrap of the dad, dear dad theory when he ran to avenge his fathers loss to that smooth-talking horny hillbilly from Hope.
In the case of the man they call Mitt, he doesn’t exactly have a long history of giving to his country; hiding out in a palace in France to avoid the Vietnam War draft (which he supported) and then lying about “longing” to serve. On this point, it seems that Mitt’s antipathy towards American military service (at least if your name is Romney) seems to have trickled down to his progeny:
“The good news is that we have a volunteer Army and that’s the way we’re going to keep it,” Romney told some 200 people gathered in an abbey near the Mississippi River that had been converted into a hotel. “My sons are all adults and they’ve made decisions about their careers and they’ve chosen not to serve in the military and active duty and I respect their decision in that regard.” He added: “One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I’d be a great president.”
[...]
Romney noted that his middle son, 36-year-old Josh, was completing a recreational vehicle tour of all 99 Iowa counties on Wednesday and said, “I respect that and respect all those and the way they serve this great country.”
The woman who asked the question, Rachel Griffiths, 41, of Milan, Ill., identified herself as a member of Quad City Progressive Action for the Common Good, as well as the sister of an Army major who had served in Iraq. “Of course not,” Griffiths said when asked if she was satisfied with Romney’s answer. “He told me the way his son shows support for our military and our nation is to buy a Winnebago and ride across Iowa and help him get elected.”
Yeah. We remember those guys.
Then there is the Mitt who used every available loophole to pay the absolute minimum in taxes and “not a dollar more” when he wasn’t stashing dollars in off-shore tax havens or dumping cash into his hard-working Winnebagoing son’s trust funds. Of course, to be fair, there is the outside possibility that Mitt has been paying more than his fair share in taxes over the last twelve years and he’s just, you know, shy about it and doesn’t like to brag on it. But then we may never know despite Harry Reid’s gentle urging for Mitt to come clean because it’s good for the soul.
Stepping in and running the Salt Lake City Olympics doesn’t really count as public service since the Olympics are a private enterprise, albeit this one in particular was financed by the federal government in record-setting dollars while Mitt called dibs on the credit. The fact that he and his Salt Lake City brethren personally profited from the government largesse was probably just a lucky coincidence. Mitt Romney did have a cup of coffee as Governor of Massachusetts although his record there seems to have been wiped clean like so many hard-drives, leaving behind only his bastard child RomneyCare who, unfortunately for Mitt, keeps showing up at the most awkward times.
And that’s about it.
Mitt Romney is a resume builder; he’s a fortune acquirer. He absorbs, he squeezes profit out and then he leaves a dessicated husk behind with hardly a glance backward or acknowledgment that it even happened. It’s hard to recall any candidate who has ever spent more time rote-reciting all of his accomplishments (minus the devastating sausage-making details that went into them) and less time spelling out what he is actually going to do if he lands the job. In fact, Romney has made a point of being as vague about his plans as people will allow him to be. He’s Mitt Romney, for Pete’s sake, he’s running for President!
Steve Erickson at The American Prospect holds Mitt Romney up and compares him to the most recent Republican presidential candidates:
Whatever else was true of him, no one doubted Richard Nixon was a man of ability. Whatever else was true of him, no one doubted Barry Goldwater was a man of conviction. No one doubted that Gerald Ford was a man of integrity, or that Ronald Reagan was a man of eloquence, or that George Herbert Walker Bush was a man of experience, or that Robert Dole was a man of legislative accomplishment, or that George W. Bush was a man of crusty charisma, or that John McCain was a man of heroism. Nothing we’ve seen of him so far indicates that Mitt Romney shares a single one of these qualities. Craven, arrogant, empty, dull, opportunistic—he’s a man of only ambition and acquisition, his distinctions the antitheses of all the attributes that have commended others to his party in the past.
Of course, that was a different Republican Party in a different America (even the John McCain one). That Republican Party was interested in governing and not dedicated to destroying the government from within. And, in Mitt Romney, this New Republican Party (now 40% more teabaggier!) have found their perfect machine: a soulless automaton who made his fortune through acquisitions and creative destruction.
To Mitt, it’s just another job, just like his old job…




68 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Brilliant writing all the way around.
The Baining of America.
Seconded.
Just another job. The guy who takes the job that’s offered and immediately begins looking for a ‘better’ one. In and out within six months – nobody remembers whose mug that is on the back shelf of the break room.
Not really going to work for the Presidency.
Every presidential campaign is a years long mobius strip of talking point pablum, but up until Romney candidates at least accepted that people wanted at least a glimpse of the person under the lies, if for no other reason than to give voters a skeleton upon which they could build whatever attributes they desired in a president, realistic or not.
Romney either has such tight control over his message that any realistic image of him as a person can’t peek through, or he actually has shown his true face and it was so utterly unremarkable that there wasn’t any there, there.
Might also be that what we consider droning political pablum he actually thinks are deeply considered philosophical positions.
“Marvin Hamlisch dies at 68; award-winning composer of popular music
Judith Crist dies at 90; film critic ‘most hated by Hollywood’
Robert Hughes dies; art critic and author was 74
John Keegan dies at 78; military historian wrote ‘Face of Battle’”
This is as tho my entire era ended, all at once. Everyone. All gone.
Yep, what jhudson said – you’ve been masterfully laying down the heavy ordnance of late, as the milvets might say (like the Rmoneys, I are not one of those folk; unlike the Rmoneys, I don’t support unnecessary adventures filled with death and destruction, especially adventures where someone else gets sent off to get blowed up real good).
P.S. A trivial thang – I’m OK with dessicate and similar double-’s’ declensions (is that the term?), but Merriam-Webster and OED are not. As a lifelong user of desiccators and desiccants, the double-’s’ spelling just sounds more correct, so hopefully the big word authorities will acknowledge that variant some day. In the meantime, would hate to see you lose a Scrabble game over this tricksie word against some foe who insists on OED or M-W being the authoritative reference.
It’s a d*mn good question. Albeit one could say some similar stuff about W. In the end, I think it’s just as mundane & banal as yet another naked grab for power. Clearly the “salary” is of no interest to Willard (as it might have been to some others).
Civil service? Serving the people or the nation? Not bloody likely.
Fealty to the MIC & BigCorps who’ll reward him handsomely?? Now you’re talking.
Being in power? Being THE One? Now you’re really talking!!
What else does this schlub have to do anyway? He’s been at the top of various heaps for his whole life. Might as well crush the rest of the 99% under his boot heel. Why the hell not? Might be good for shitz ‘n grinz.
I think we all have seen enough glimpses of “Mitt the bully” to know whats under the lies.
A brilliant summation of the modern Goddamned Obnoxious Party and its presumptive Vampire Presidential nominee.
His primary objective will be to sign over the National Forests, Parks, and all related mineral rights to his privateering peers.
But Ann says he’s hung like Rafalca. Oh wait …
Did Dubya ever get to cut the roads thru the National Forests and Parks?
That was a scam, of course – designed to give the trees away to his
buddies.
Once you get the roads in, it’s easier to cut more trees in order to “prevent forest fires”.
Of note: Republicans have been salivating over the giant redwoods for years.
Mitt has big plans. First, he’s going to cut taxes for the rich and further shift the burden onto workers. Mitt’s going to hack away at the Social Safety Net. Plus more Deregulation and Privatization. All the things Obama’s been doing, but worse.
isnt there some Mormon prophecy about them taking control. regardless i read an article about how “mormon” he actaully is and it makes him make A LOT more sense. Like why he “wished Ann was there” so she could explain the wimmins issues to/for him.
Willard’s entire campaign is “Obama sucks and…ponies!”. I think it’s pretty clear that Republicans are going to have a field test of their national voter suppression efforts’ effectiveness. This is Obama’s race to lose or the Republicans’ race to steal. I don’t see how Rmoney legitimately wins, barring some pretty extraordinary unrelated influences.
Even Massachusetts Republicans were fed up with Romney because he did nothing as Governor, except travel around the country, trying to position himself to run for President in 2008.
And, while he was at it, the so-called Governor of Massachusetts, who should have been the state’s number one booster, was insulting the state all over the country.
Finally, even Republican media called him on it and stopped.
No, you can’t really put Romney’s term as Governor of Massachusetts in his public service column. He only waited to be elected so he could use it as a springboard to the office he’s really wanted all his life, the oval one.
“Craven, arrogant, empty, dull, opportunistic—he’s a man of only ambition and acquisition . . .”
Well then he is the perfect man to represent the US. He is an exact reflection of a hollow, violent, consumerist American empire that steals, murders and uses up more per capita than any other nation on the planet. Romney is truly one of us. What’s everybody complaining about? He is about as representative as we are likely to get.
Why Willard runs?
What’s the only job better than President and 1st Prophet?
You got that right. You have no idea how painful it is to us in MA every time reference is made to “Governor Romney”. We just want to scream “Please! It’s EX-governor Romney! We want to forget that slimy bastard!”
So why is he still doing fine in the polls, contrary to any shred of sense?
I say the guest on Michelle Martin’s NPR program “Tell Me More” (Aug. 2nd) was dead center bullseye. The eminent 80 y.o. playwright, actor, director Athol Fugard, an Afrikaan from South Africa, activist on apartheid and racism in So.Africa for over 60 yrs. said “The problem in the U.S. is that there is a Black man in the White House.”
It occurs to me that Romney is unable to realize that, while from his point of view running for Prez and being governor is like running Bain–i.e., it’s all business, to the rest of us out here, it isn’t. Whatever “citizenship” is, and how its effect on our lives either does or doesn’t conform to our assumptions and fantasies about it, there is a personal aspect to it. And he is utterly oblivious of that fact.
In business (I assume) you lie, hedge, dodge, mislead, and reverse yourself as much as (you think) you can get away with. Your subordinates may not like it, but fuck them–you’re the boss. Your competitors may not like it, but who are they kidding? It’s BUSINESS, which is metonymic for “sanctioned dishonesty, cruelty, greed, grasping opportunism.”
Romney’s problem is–hilariously–exactly what he thinks his strength is, and what he’s running on: his business experience. It’s made him believe the whole world outside the exec suite works that way, and he can’t understand why nobody likes him. (Or he can, and just doesn’t care. It’s too late for him to change, so all he can do is power through and hope that money, ads, and voter suppression will do the trick.)
They are not going to bother with cutting down the trees.
This time they are going to sell national land for cheap to their rich buddies.
Oh yeah, they are opening saying it.
Without the rich buddy part of course.
Goddamn you, sir! Even when you tone down the snark meter to “4″ you are a must read. This perfectly sums everything up, a few paragraphs of pure incisiveness, eliciting a “yes, yes! That is it, exactly!”
Of course, you didn’t mention in what way Obama failed you today, but still, bravo!
The real question is: If Mitt manages to get himself elected, and since he has shown himself to be an inept zero when it comes to running the country (much like Dubya), who WILL be the REAL power behind the man?
Best post ever, Mr. Bogg. Beyond the snark.
The Mormon Gods of money.
Don’t know why this never occurred to me before, but Mitt Romney’s role at Bain isn’t a Batman thing. Mitt is most like Galactus, destroyer of
worldsjobs.All those ignorant Right wingers who hate outsourcing and incourcing are going to be in for the su-prize of their lives when Mitt takes the wheel.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/03/21/449046/gop-budget-calls-for-fire-sale-of-public-lands-while-preserving-40-billion-in-tax-breaks-to-big-oil/
Thanks for the link.
If you listen to their rants on the House and Senate floor the Repugs are all talking about it. I’ve also noticed it when they get on TV too they throw it out there like it’s going to pay off the ebt.
Oh yeah, they are going for it. Just like the rich in Aspen built their multi million dollars homes on pristine federal land by claiming mineral rights, now the rich are going to owe our national land outright.
And you can be damn sure they and only they are going to be able to buy it for a song in rigged auctions.
BTW, they are going to use Chaffetz and Utah as the poster child because Clinton made a large part of Utah federal land and they depise that.
Don’t worry though the serfs who they will rile up to get behind doing it won’t be getting any of that land for cheap unless there’s no water for a good 100 miles or so.
You don’t see Mitt popping up in the spiderweb diagrams of who owns everything and there’s only one way he’s getting into that club….
The latest target of wingnuts is Andrea Saul. Fire Her Immediately for truth telling.
On the nose.
Remember that the Mormon hierarchy is a gerontocracy (and has been since the days of Brigham Young). Mitt may still make First Pro
phetfit and President, he’s just got some aging to do first.That land was already Federal land. What Clinton did was to move it from the Bureau of Land Management (where it was available for rape, pillage and plunder) and into the National Park Service (where there are still a few restrictions on use).
I’d like to know his motivation, as well. Do you remember Bush’s one regret as president?: that he wasn’t able to ‘reform’ Social Security. Maybe that’s what’s motivating Mitt. I think he only thinks in terms of dollars and cents, that’s his total focus. Maybe he sees a lot of money to be made if only the damn government would get out of the retirement income business. The man is greedy beyond belief and that may be too much money for him to ignore.
Oh…and fwiw….I think he’s as dumb as GWB.
Yup. A perfect representative of Republican America, ca. 2012.
He does seem so stupid. What made him so successful?
Good looks, blond wife, Mormon connections?
Really, I can’t believe this man made a billion dollars. God.
BargainCOuntertenor, yes, I did know it was something along those lines. Still amazes me the average serf thinks these rich evil bastards are doing anything good for them ever in their schemes.
Are they that incapable of learning? I mean it’s been a generation now the Republicans (rich people, I don’t exclude the Democrats) have been screwing them.
Mitt’s bucket list keeps coming to mind…
#1 Get rich (whatever it takes)
#2 Get elected to a national office (well try any way)
#3 Save the US Olympics (yahoo-an opportunity for national recoginition)
#4 Get elected to a national office (really this time)
#5 Be President of the US
No, I don’t think so, solai.
Dumbya Bush spent his life trading on his name. Whenever he got into trouble (which was a frequent occurrence) he relied on his Bush connections to get him out of trouble. He was an indifferent student who would have flunked out of any school with academic standards, assuming that he could have gained admission in the first place. For him, Yale and Harvard were about making connections. When his businesses failed, he was bailed out by his father’s friends and people seeking to buy his access and influence.
Mitt, by comparison, was a very capable student at Stanford, BYU and Harvard. He did not go into the auto industry (his father’s business). Although some of the LLCs owned by Bain failed, he has evidently been very sharp at extracting money from these deals regardless of their success or failure as business entities. That makes him a parasite, perhaps.
What Mittens and Dumbya both have in abundance is an amoral approach to business decisions and a lack of empathy for those not in his in-group.
Yep.
solai, if you haven’t read Family of Secrets you should…
Willards just the man to gut what’s left of the New Deal/War against poverty programs. Count on this guy to do that right out of the gate. Barry has screwed up so badly, I expect another BV$H 2 type takeover even if they have to steal this up front with all the so called voter ID laws( aka the new Jim Crow poll taxes.) The Reptiles have stacked the deck now even taking over what was left of the D party and turning into a B team for the Corpocracy. I’n bracing myself for 8 more yrs. of un-creative destruction by the teaparty and it’s Xian allies.
Brutal take down. I like it.
As for the unreleased returns, I’m guessing the “hasn’t paid any taxes” meme is the least of it. I assume there’s some really ugly shit buried in those schedules, the sort of stuff that would make TurboTax throw a mainspring.
Not that I don’t believe Willard, mind you, but as Saint Ronnie urged way back when, “Trust, but verify.” Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought all these teabaggin’ wingnuts wanted to be just like Saint Ronnie when they grow up. Well here’s their big chance…
As governor, job number one for brother Mitt
Was traveling the land to say “My state is shit!”
Willard’s spawn are patriots. How can you doubt?
They also serve who only loaf and gad about.
It would be nice to think so, but…no. Successful investment banker and vulture..er, venture capitalists are not stupid people. The Marquis is almost a caricature of such, leaving aside the Mormon aspect. Greedy, sociopathic, egotistical and unburdened by either conscience or self-awareness, yes. Stupid, no.
I’d say completely lacking in empathy as well, but the sociopathic part covers that. What sets Romney apart from Bill Clinton, and even George W. Bush for that matter, is that he is unable to even appear to empathize with the average voter. Clinton could say “I feel your pain” and people semi-believed him; after all, he came from a poor background. W was a guy that people thought they’d like to have a beer with, although every so often that mean asshole tendency crept out. Nobody is ever going to believe that Mittens feels their pain, or indeed anybody’s pain.
That being said, the attitude that goes along with these traits can make such a person appear stupid at times. Mittens’ stance on releasing tax information is a prime example – he doesn’t feel like he should have to release such info, because, goddamnit, he’s Willard Mitt Romney and he doesn’t feel like it and doesn’t have to. Leaving aside what is, no doubt, a shitload of stuff in those tax records that would tend to seriously piss off those of us not blessed with net worth of seven figures or more.
This is more or less the same attitude driving his fixation on winning the Presidency. He’s Mitt Romney, he’s worked for it, and he is entitled to it, whether no-account voters making less than $250k a year think so or not. Opposition to his will is not something that he’s accustomed to dealing with, since there has been nobody who has successfully opposed him up until now except other Republicans. He views them with contempt, much as investment bankers, bond traders and other Wall Street maggots view anyone who does not work on Wall Street. They really do believe they are the best, the brightest, and entitled to their obscene compensation levels, no matter how many times they fuck up and bring ruin to millions of other people.
I can’t fault anything you’ve said. Yet, Mitt’s made so many blunders that I don’t see any intelligence there. The insults he’s hurled (rain ponchos, baked goods, Olympics) are just such incredibly stupid remarks for a politician that I’m left thinking he’s an idiot.
Your argument that he isn’t stupid may be true.
But did you listen to the Republican debates? MITT SURE SOUNDS STUPID.
True dat, but considering the audiences and his opponents what would you expect? The audiences didn’t want guys who sounded smart, they wanted candidates who threw them red meat – remember, these are people who yelled “let him die” about a man without insurance and booed a disabled veteran. His opponents (with the possible exception of Newt and his Neuticles™) weren’t exactly walking around bent over double with the weight of their intellects either. Nuance, subtlety or for that matter actual thought would not only have been wasted but ineffective.
Why try to sound smart for people who don’t especially regard being smart as a virtue?
Judith Crist died? Now I’ll never know what to think of “Beasts of the Southern Wild.”
What’s your opinion of the insulting remark about the rain ponchos? It reminded me of GWB using a ladies jacket to wipe his glasses.
th
Hey, he’s an insensitive asshole whose political antennae must have been amputated prior to the current campaign. Doesn’t make him stupid, although again his complete lack of empathy most certainly makes him sound stupid at times.
I wasn’t challenging your premise. I was just looking for your opinion on how he could be so tone-deaf.
That’s it – lack of empathy and lack of self-awareness. He has no idea of how he sounds to anyone not in his income bracket, or perhaps more accurately doesn’t really care how he sounds to anyone not in his income bracket. They’re not important to him in any real way, so why should he care about how he sounds to them? He’s never cared about what impact his actions have had upon others, and by his standards that lack of concern has worked very well for him. He’s rich – very – and people who are concerned about others usually aren’t. Who’s going to tell him he’s wrong? Certainly not the Mormon Church; as long as he gives the church major bucks they don’t care what he does or who gets hurt in the process. The church elders certainly weren’t going to lose much sleep over a bunch of non-Mormon workers getting laid off, especially if the Church got a cut of the profits through tithes.
Okay, great writing, Mr. Bogg. But I’m officially sick of this. Mitt’s dumb as a rock–despite his grades at Stanford, BYU and Harvard. If he had half the sense W. did at that age, he no doubt belonged to the “right” fraternities that gave him access to encyclopedic exam files or–dare I say it–purloined copies of that term’s exams.
Spot on.
“He does seem so stupid. What made him so successful?”
Privilege. That and a near sociopathic level of selfishness. But mostly privilege. Had he been born outside of the upper class, we wouldn’t be talking about him.
Why does Romney want to be President? What upper class criminal grifter with any self respect wouldn’t want that brass ring?
My friends and I had a discussion one night about Mitt. We asked ourselves if we would lay off a few hundred people if it meant a million dollars for ourselves. Tough question for some since they never seem able to get ahead and some said they might do it. But then someone asked if after you had a million bucks, would you do it again…and again….and again. No one was even tempted by that. You have to be a special kind of evil to do what Mitt and his ilk call just business.
Okay, so Josh and his Winnebago are going to visit all of Iowa’s 99 counties. The big question is: will he visit all 100 county seats?
Terrific post, T, but the link in this sentence – “…albeit this one in particular was financed by the federal government…” – is going to a kickstarter page for the San Diego market, and I don’t think that’s where it’s supposed to be going.
In re your last paragraph: Indeed. Romney’s response to some members of the crowd that resulted in his comment that “corporations are people, my friend” demonstrates just how much contempt he has for opposing views when such are uttered by those “beneath” him. The content of what he said not that important. What is revealing–what shows his blind privilege and unempathetic, criminal selfishness–is how he engaged the dissenters. It is worth watching that footage again to see his barely controlled contempt. He is a man who truly doesn’t give a shit about those outside the owning class except for how they might serve his interests.
“The conclusion drawn by … most of our élites … is that the population constitutes a deep and dangerous well of ignorance and irrationality; if our civilization is in crisis the fault must lie with the populace which is not rising to the inescapable challenges. And yet civilizations do not collapse because the citizenry are corrupt or lazy or anti-intellectual. These people do not have the power and influence to either lead or destroy. Civilizations collapse when those who have power fail to do their jobs.” –John Ralston Saul
Can we imagine what would happen during televised debates if the candidates spoke in coherent sentences, offered verifiable data, or discussed issues in terms of cause and effect relationships and reasonable consequences? No one, from the yahoos on the floor to the the TV commentators to the viewers at home, would know wether to shit or wind their watch. In the context of US presidential politics, to talk intelligently, honestly and clearly would render the whole spectacle utterly incomprehensible.
You have described the “business” of Romney and ilk perfectly! That level of wealth demands that others suffer in order to attain it. It is not arrived as the natural reward of honest hard work–that’s the myth that owners like Romney tell the citizens in order to keep them in line and ripe for exploitation.
Fixed. Thanks
I think you’re right. That IS the real question. I don’t know the answer, but there is a clue, a modus operendi (sp?). It has the name Bain in it.
…And also, it would make doing shots to the candidates’ hackneyed talking points really really difficult.
It would indeed wreck all the good drinking games. :)