Did you know that there is a real live Republican running against Dianne Feinstein in California? Yes. It is true. Her name is Elizabeth Emken:
With members of Congress across the country battling anti-incumbent fever, California’s three-term U.S. senator, Dianne Feinstein, would seem to be a natural target in her re-election bid.
Challenger Elizabeth Emken has presented herself as a fresh face with a commitment to reform, but she has been unable to overcome the flagging popularity of the California Republican Party and her own lack of political experience to mount a credible challenge.
[...]
Emken, an autism activist whose only previous campaign experience consists of finishing last among four Republicans in a 2010 congressional primary, beat 23 other little-known candidates in the June primary for a chance to challenge the popular Democratic senator.
The former IBM middle manager picked up 12.5 percent of the vote– twice as much as her closest competitor– but has since struggled to gain recognition and raise money.
A Field Poll conducted in mid-September showed Feinstein leading Emken 57 percent to 31 percent among likely voters and even picking up support from 18 percent of Republicans.
Bill Carrick, Feinstein’s campaign consultant, characterized Emken as “the least qualified candidate” he has seen run against the senator. Feinstein herself said it can be nearly impossible for an unknown to run for statewide office in California because of its size and diversity.
“People think you can just jump into one of these races,” she said. “It is very difficult to do; you have to build a base over time.”
Emken had raised about $200,000 at the time of the most recent Federal Election Commission filings, while Feinstein had gathered nearly $8 million, despite being one of many Democratic candidates and officeholders victimized in an embezzlement scandal involving a former campaign treasurer.
So how did Emken get that whopping 12.5% of that vote to become the Republican standard bearer? She employed a mailing house to include her on a conservative slate mailer (suck it, Orly Taitz!) that went out to 5.5 million Californians and, after picking up 604,910 votes, it was “Sweet! Beltway here I come…”.
Sadly/hilariously, that is not how it is turning out:
A conservative slate mailing company is suing Republican U.S. Senate candidate Elizabeth Emken for fraud and breach of contract.
Emken is the GOP standard-bearer this fall against Democratic U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
The suit, filed by Irvine-based Landslide Communications, which sends out millions of pieces of political mail, mostly aimed at conservative voters every year, alleges that Emken improperly repaid a personal loan she made to her campaign before paying the mailing house the $65,000 they say she owes them.
The mailing house says they sent out more than 5.5 million pieces of mail touting Emken’s candidacy, but were only paid $45,000 of the $110,000 Emken’s campaign agreed to pay.
Remember that $200,000 that she had on hand? Yeah. Funny thing about that. According to the Landslide Communications lawsuit, Emken loaned her campaign $200,000 on March 24th and proceeded to flash her roll to vendors to show them that she had the ability to pay and it was full speed ahead. But then she repaid herself that $200,000 three weeks later on April 18th and didn’t notify anyone until May 29th, just a week before the election.
Psych!
Now she’s got no money no money no money because nobody is going donate to a campaign that looks worse than Todd Akins which means that Elizabeth Emken is like a low rent Sarah Palin, if that is possible.
The end.





34 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
She’s got the GOP grift down cold!! Will Mitt call her for business advice?
Yet another splendid example from the Party of Personal Responsibility.
Jesus, we really are breaking up as a country, aren’t we? That’s the best the R’s can do in CA? And TX is about to elect a total nutbar as Senator, simply because he has an R after his name. As a friend of mine used to say “we should have let the bastards secede, except we need an army.”
I guess “Landslide Communications” has learned a valuable lesson about extending credit to the campaign of someone whose sole experience consisted of finishing fourth out of four in a GOP primary (in a district won by the Democratic incumbent).
Meanwhile, thanks to CA’s new ‘top-two-regardless-of-party” system, my State Assembly and US House district races are both GOP-free, two Democrats against each other in the general election.
I don’t think an R has been elected to statewide office in CA since Ah-node rode his celebrity to Sacramento, & he was the first statewide Ratbag for a while. (Possibly excepting an insurance commissioner or the like.)
What really gets me about this is that DiFi is 79. No ageist I, & no spring chicken either, if you know what I mean, but c’mon, get out of the way you wretched “moderate” Democrat & tool of your investment banker husband.
Past the timeout to edit my comment, but…from the complaint TBogg linked, Landslide agreed to send the mailers on Feb. 24, and the shell-game loan was made on March 24. Then, at #40, in May, Landslide sent the mailers despite having already been stiffed by Emken (per their own complaint), simply due to the bogus loan.
All things considered, I’m laughing at both Emken and Landslide. Maybe they could take their disagreement to the Jerry Springer Show and work things out.
The Republicans do not need Feinstein’s seat. Feinstein is a
stealthRepublican (like Obama).All gains made on the deaths of Moscone and Milk. If they had not been murdered Di would be a mere foot note in SF history.
Feinstein stated, “I believe the Patriot Act is vital to the protection of the American people.”
So now that Emken has pretty much eliminated herself from the picture, it’s time for Orly to step up and turn this into a real nail-biter of a senate race.
“50% off root canals for all sitting senators – especially Mitch McConnell.”
Never let it be said that Orly doesn’t understand how to attract the high-rollers.
B-b-but … at least Sarah Palin was chosen as Veep !
Obama couldn’t even pick HRC
because obviouslyeven though she was smarter than him !Feinstein’s a sleazebag…which is why we need Orly in the US Senate.
You have to admit that a full-blown psychotic would be more entertaining than a run-of-the-mill corporate hack.
Its a pity all this “Feinstein Is A Republican” energy wasn’t put to any use during the top-two-regardless-of-party-primary in order to get her a better opponent than Emken. October seems way too late for this if the goal were to achieve any particular result, as opposed to making noise.
I think Emken’s campaign is showing some talent there. Lots more than, say, Akin’s crazy train.
Emken’s slicker than Palin. Much slicker.
How lucky is Dianne Feinstein? Anyone from the Democratic wing of the Democratic party would be an improvement.
“California Grift” should have been an article about the crooked-conservative Feinstein. Sure it’s fun to make fun of the Republican, but couldn’t you have picked a race where the Democrat was worthy of winning the seat? I guess all that matters is if you support Obama’s conservative positions, which Feinstein does.
Another clear winner loser. She’s at the top of the bottom of her game. Plus she’s an “autism activist” which sounds like a person who encourages more autism, everybody should have autism… How can she not lose in a big way! Let’s all give her a slow clap.
It’s just a goddamned shame Jill Stein can’t run for President AND Senator.
Hey, I voted for Orly!!
I, for one, look forward to receiving blistering diatribes on the blah’s lack of personal resonsibility from this woman, Emken.
Why didn’t she contract with Nathan Sproul?
A low rent Sarah Palin? Now that’s gotta hurt, even if there is no rent lower than La Palin’s.
Grifters gonna grift.
Grifters are people too, my friend. Who is sposed to represent the hard working grifters scrounging to pay their property taxes on the inheritance that they worked so hard for. Who represents the the small business owners in small towns and rural areas who have geographic monopolies and work hard to soak their customers who have no alternative but to pay grossly inflated prices every time. Who represents the grifters in college towns who gouge students with hidden costs knowing that they dont have to worry about their reputation because their is always a new class of freshmen suckers coming every fall. Who represents the grifters who may have worked hard to build a business but then they use their profits to buy Republicans and and corporate democrats to pass legislation that subsidizes their costs and punishes their competitors. Who represents the grifters in the defense industry…oh you git the drift. Republicans have worked hard to convince even petty minded grifters like me that I BUILT THAT GRIFT an I dont own nobody nothin but Obama wants to take my grift an give it to THAT 30%.
Here’s a Salon piece on Feinstein, and all of her rightwing postions: including her unstinting support for the loon crusade in Iraq:
http://www.salon.com/2007/09/23/feinstein/
It was written in 2007. Now, Tbogg; would you like to post the ways she’s “improved” from then?
Walked in to a court
And I had to laugh
Crazy lady paid herself
Before her creditors and staff.
She’ll be making plates
in the graybar soon
California griftin’
was too tough for this loon
I just want to thank you personally for lifting the veil from my eyes about Diane Feinstein. I would NEVER have known that her politics were so utterly fascist without your help!
XXXOOOXXX
Mr. Bogg, I notice that you said nothing critical about Adolph Hitler.
Why do you love Hitler?
{/godwin}
Yeah. Um, that was not what the post was about, I never said Feinstein has “improved”, and I believe I have previously called DiFi “Dan White’s revenge” but you keep fucking that chicken because the Democratic Party is the absolute worst, as you keep reminding us.
Eh? This is root of most of Emken’s problems as a Grifter. IBM Middle Manager?? Emken hasn’t really figured out exactly HOW to Grift to best effect. Just like lying, if you’re gonna grift, grift BIG.
Emken needs to take a few notes from her “sister” Repubs who ran for office in CA previously: EMeg Whitman (currently onto her next BIG GRIFT of getting on the wingnut welfare gravy train at HP: choo choo choo) & Carly Fiorina (previously on the HP wingnut welfare gravey train: choo choo choo)… Of course, EMeg also has availed herself of that other favorite wingnut welfare gravy train (mostly likely Fiorina, as well) of Insider Trading!!
In relationship to Palin, Emken certainly is low-rent. No wonder she’s doing so lousy. Rightwingers in CA, and elsewhere, are only prepared to donate to and vote for Grifters of a higher magnitude. Emken needs to step up her game or get lost. Sounds like it’s gonna be the latter…
So why didn’t the Greens run a candidate in the Senate primary? I would have voted for them.
Thank you for that T!
From here on out when I read the same tired crap from tanbark I’ll immediately think “chicken fucker” as in “tanbark the chicken fucker”.
tanbark writes: Here’s a Salon piece on Feinstein, and all of her rightwing postions: including her unstinting support for the loon crusade in Iraq:
I note that you refer to this as “a Salon piece”, rather than “a Glenn Greenwald piece,” which I regard as tacit acknowledgement of the deeply corroded credibility of Glenn Greenwald.
Sooner or later, Greenwald will sell out to the right wing. He’ll mitigate it with noise like “voting his pocketbook,” but, I guarantee it, though dishonest writing is not the sole province of the right wing, it surely has a home there, and Glenn, in his heart, knows this.
Note to Glenn:
Nobody, but nobody, cast an unconditional vote for the invasion of Iraq. The authorization itself was conditional upon exhausting all other means to certify that Iraq was in fact, not still holding weapons which it had been told it may no longer have.
In fact, the authorization put inspectors back in Iraq, who were well on the way to certifying the fact that Iraq had in fact complied, when Dubya decided to invade, forcing the inspectors to evacuate.
“Had I known then what we know now” is the phrase used by a number of politicians to describe the fact that they didn’t know that Dubya was a genocidal maniac, not that they didn’t know that Iraq was a disarmed country. The authorization was a way, for many, to make Dubya put up or shut up. It backfired on ‘em.
Glenn Greenwald will never, ever, tell the truth about this, and again, this is significant.