Previously former Governor Mitt “Mitt” Romney did not understand how the Gheys were having their gay babies together, what with the matched sets of vags and peens; how does this work? Nowadays he can just have a father/spawn talk with son Tagg “Tagg” Romney about these how fake babies are made and suddenly, for Mitt, all of those all those old turkey baster jokes would make sense.
Robotic ha ha ha.
But back when Mitt was governancing communist paradise Massachusetts this gay baby thing was a total mystery to him so he absolutely refused to validate the gay babies tickets because they obviously didn’t exist and to do so would have been baby fraud or maybe hetero-baby blood libel.
…after gays and lesbians in Massachusetts won the right to marry in 2003, Governor Romney wouldn’t allow the Registry of Vital Records and Statistics to revise birth certificate forms for babies born to same-sex couples. The plan was to have the box for “father,” for example, relabeled “father or second parent.” But according to documents obtained by Waas, Romney rejected the plan, demanding the agency continue using old forms. Romney then demanded hospitals get permission from his office each time a child was born to a same sex-couple in order to cross out, with a pen, the label “father” or “mother,” and write-in, with a pen, “second parent.” (Romney also required gay male parents to get a court order before any birth certificate was issued.)
[...]
Romney hadn’t even previously fathomed that gay people had children. Boston Spirit magazine reported last month that when gay activists met with him in his office in 2004, as Romney was backing a failed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage in the state, Romney remarked, “I didn’t know you had families.” Julie Goodridge, lead plaintiff in the landmark case that won marriage rights for gays and lesbians before the Supreme Judicial Court, asked what she should tell her 8-year-old daughter about why the governor would block the marriage of her parents. According to Goodridge, Romney responded,”I don’t really care what you tell your adopted daughter. Why don’t you just tell her the same thing you’ve been telling her the last eight years.”
That the governor was a giant douchebag? Well, that would be a start and not entirely inaccurate.
Months after his battle with the Registry of Vital Records began, as Wass reports in the Globe, Romney spoke before the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington:
He outlined his misgivings about the request from the Registry of Vital Records. “The children of America have the right to have a father and a mother,” Romney said in his prepared remarks. “What should be the ideal for raising a child? Not a village, not ‘parent A’ and ‘parent B,’ but a mother and a father.” Romney also warned about the societal impact of gay parents raising children. “Scientific studies of children raised by same-sex couples are almost nonexistent,” he said. “It may affect the development of children and thereby future society as a whole.”
The following year, 2005, Romney spoke to conservative voters in South Carolina, as he trained his eye on the presidency. “Some gays are actually having children born to them,” he said. “It’s not right on paper. It’s not right in fact. Every child has a right to a mother and father.”
Which would be one parent with a vagina and the other one with a penis, even if the penis does not work. Like Tagg “Tagg” Romney’s.




29 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Refresh my memory. How many out of the five Romney seedlings are (cough, cough) gay curious?
And by the way, Tagg has been my nom
du blog for four years.
I miss Jon-Jon Romney. It’s like they aren’t proud of him or something…
Said the King of the “Magical Under-Pants” planet.
“Every child has a right to a mother and father.”
Or, like Romney’s OWN FATHER, a father and multiple mothers. Most people would choke on the hypocrisy of being a grandchild of polygamists while criticizing other peoples’ family arrangements.
“Scientific studies of children raised by same-sex couples are almost nonexistent,” he said.
“And when they are written, I’ll treat them with the same ignorant contempt I reserve for scientific studies of anthropogenic global warming, evolution and probably gravity.”
Objection, assumes facts not in evidence (i.e., that Mitt is a human being and therefore qualifies under the category “people”).
Shorter me: Jeez, what an asshole.
By the time she was back in the hallway, she was reduced to tears. “I really kind of lost it,” says Goodridge. “I’ve never stood before someone who had no capacity for empathy.”
The RomneyTron3000, being a Republican OS, is not compatible with the EmpathySimulatorv2.0 service pack.
I am still trying to figure out what, if anything, Mitt actually knows anything about. Haven’t seen any evidence of it yet.
How very, very much he deserves to be President.
You can know things which are wrong, right?
He knows how to schmooze with the over-privileged, how to work with them to take advantage of anyone outside of his Machiavellian inner circle, and how to convince himself that doing this well this makes him a wonderful person destined to be god of his own heavenly kingdom.
Actually, I think it was Mittens’ grandfather who was the glutton for punishment. But I’m sure Mitt will argue that the 30 spawn all had a mom and a single dad–even if it WAS stretching things kinda thin.
Not just Tagg.!
All the Romney spawn used surrogates for breeding.
…So that talking out of multiple sides of his mouth at once is a “god thing?” Atheism is looking better and better….
“The children of America have the right to have a father and a mother,” Romney said in his prepared remarks. “What should be the ideal for raising a child? Not a village, not ‘parent A’ and ‘parent B,’ but a mother and a father.”
Or, the right to a father and as many mothers (as nurturers and rearers, not just biological egg-producers and oven-for-babies providers) as that father could prove his worth in the eyes of god by providing. Just ONE father, though — that’s the key. The word “patriarch” somehow springs to mind.
As a citizen of this fair commonwealth (and just so you know, Charlie Pierce’s “God save it” springs from the practice here in MA of ending many public ceremonies with the county sheriff or some such declaring, “And God save the Commonwealth of Massachusetts!” which is not only a hoot, on a par with a good marching band at half time, but often truly moving — yeah, it’s a common wealth, res publica, a common enterprise), I barely remember Mitt as governor. We got a compromise healthcare program (the Dems wanted some sort of single payer scheme, but maybe this could lead to that), lots more fees (Mitt wasn’t the first to disguise taxes in the form of fees, but he continued it enthusiastically), and lots of vetoes from the gov who supposedly worked so well with his dem legislature (most of which vetoes were ineffective — too many dems). I thank Charlie Pierce for reminding me why I remember Mitt so little — he disappeared from the state for the last two years as he began his run for pres.
Must add an anecdote: my husband and I went to Boston to get our passports renewed in person (sloppy us — we’d let them expire and found ourselves with a chance for a great trip). We sail through that process, leave the building only to find a few TV cameras and a small crowd awaiting us — what’s this? well, not us, it turned out, but the next couple out of the building a half-minute later. The first same-sex couple to be married in our fair commonwealth! How lucky we were to be there to join in cheering them! How low-key it really all was. (The low-keyness: how very Massachusetts.)
I agree with all of the comments that have preceded mine. Good on all of you. Yay you!
What I want to say is that there is a shitload of research on children raised by gay parents. What the research documents is that children raised in gay families are better adjusted and perform better in school than children raised in heterosexual families. Lesbian parents have higher rates of success than gay male parents, but both tend to be above the norm for hetero families.
So, yeah, what a fuckin’ maroon.
According to this blogger, Tagg is surprisingly gentle. Usually, he says, Mormons want to punish you for your lust:
http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2012/10/tagg-romneys-gay-lover-speaks-out-tagg.html
“Traditional family” ranks right up there with “law and order” and “welfare queens” in the right-wing lexicon of dog-whistles. Willard Romney and most of the Republican Party believe that a “traditional family” is headed by a white male, whose word is law.
Next time he sees a pregnant Ghey, he’s going to hold her down and cut off her hair.
Avoiding the moral issues, there are plenty of others with respect to registration, one of them being incest.
The story I heard about the rise of the adultery commandment has to do whith knowing the lineage. Which, of course, goes a long way to be sure you don’t have children with a near relative.
yeah, but, drones.
There is no evidence. I am forever amazed at how little anyone outside of Massachusetts asks we who do live here what our experience is with this fuckin’ creep. Is everyone going to wait until he’s elected to find out or is everyone duped into believing we really are all leftist commies here?
And speaking of “duped”, we are after all, the first electorate to be duped by Romney. He isn’t even human. He’ll be the first Halloween costume of a president to be a sub-human in reality.
was that so they could cast out the defective snowflakes and birth only perfections?
Yeah, who gives a crap about bombing innocent brown people. You’re going to express some disdain for people who care about it. We appreciate today’s contribution and will look for something equally inspired from you tomorrow.
“Every child has a right to a mother and father.”
So how can he justify war?
Better to ask someone who’s experienced his actual performance than the reporters who push his PR handouts.
Mitt Romney: the stealth Republican candidate with stealth Republican policies and stealth federal income tax returns, wearing stealth Mormon magic underpants, and having his own right-wing stealth-care policy…that is, LYING.
miss consolation prize 2012: four to eight years of ‘underpants’ hit pieces … hmmmm, more jin (pre-drunken gin) needed …
beat that straw! beat it good!
whack! whack! whack!
My parents were antiwar activists during the Vietnam era. Obviously, I have a different perspective, and believe that bombing villages and killing kids is godawful. Clearly, you don’t.
But try this–go online to some of the websites OUTSIDE the US where they have pictures of the kids lying in the rubble. Then–it may be hard–imagine that your child is brown, like my child is. Then look among those faces of the dead. Who knows, maybe some spark of humanity in you will be revived.
Or maybe you’re just superficial enough to believe that having a mixed race guy as President makes such bombing alright. Obviously, there are a lot of people who think like you. “Straw,” though–really? You’re THAT disrespectful about someone who cares about drones? They’re over your head too, of course, but why should you care. I even hear that it makes some people sleep better. Dunno why or how they could call themselves progressives, but that’s their concern.