To the surprise of virtually no one, mercenary rentboy Lanny Davis has been retained in the war (Jewhad?) 0n Chuck Hagel:
I believe a president — Republican or Democrat — almost always deserves to have the Cabinet that he wishes, with the bar very, very high to oppose his choice. Thus, there should be heavy presumption that President Obama’s reported nominee for secretary of Defense, former Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel, should be confirmed by the Senate.
Whether senators agree or disagree with Hagel’s past positions — on the Iraq war (against), declaring the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a “terrorist organization” (against), engaging with Iran in negotiations more aggressively (for), engaging with Hamas in seeking a peace agreement in the Middle East (for) — these positions are known to the president, and he still has decided to nominate Hagel for the post.
But: Hagel owes it to all Americans, not just to American Jews, to do more than apologize for use of the expression “Jewish lobby” in communicating his concern about its power.
He must understand, first, that there is a difference between Jews who support Israel and the “Israel lobby.”
To suggest that there is a “Jewish lobby” is not only inaccurate, it is highly offensive to the American Jewish community.
I’m so old , I remember when a couple of other guys who used the term “Israel Lobby” and they got buried:
Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government is removing its logo from a paper about the “Israel lobby” that was co-authored by its academic dean.
The new version of the paper also has a more prominent disclaimer warning that the paper’s views belong only to its authors.
The changes appear to be a sign that the university is distancing itself from the document in the face of a furor from faculty members, Jewish leaders, and a congressman who say it fails to meet academic standards and promotes anti-Semitic myths.
The paper, “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” was written by the Kennedy School’s Stephen Walt and a political science professor and the codirector of the Program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago, John Mearsheimer, and published by the Kennedy School.
[...]
It also has drawn sharp criticism from prominent Harvard faculty, including Kennedy School lecturer Marvin Kalb, literature professor Ruth Wisse, and law professor Alan Dershowitz; Harvard students, and Rep. Eliot Engel, a Democrat of New York. Many critics have called for Harvard to withdraw the paper until it can be brought up to acceptable standards of scholarship, alleging that the document is riddled with factual inaccuracies and suffers from bias and faulty research.
Against this backdrop, the Walt-Mearsheimer paper – which had been published online at the Kennedy School’s Web site – underwent a makeover yesterday that downplayed ties between its contents, its authors, Harvard, and the University of Chicago.
As initially published, the top of the cover page bears the logo and name of Harvard and the Kennedy School, and identifies the paper as part of a “Faculty Research Working Papers Series.”
In the revised version currently on the Web site, the cover page is stripped of the Harvard and Kennedy School imprimatur, and the paper is identified as a “Working Paper,” without any mention of a “faculty” affiliation.
Walt and Mearshimer later expanded upon their paper, expanding it into a 500-page book which addressed the issues brought up by their critics, but by that time it was too late as they were permanently branded as anti-semites which is how the AIPAC/ADL puke funnel works.
…and now, with a helpful assist from Jennifer Rubin and Bill Kristol with his little band of fratboys at the Free Bacon, Chuck Hagel is soaking in it.





33 Comments
Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About TBogg
RSS/XML Feed
Um, Lanny Davis always brags that he opposed the Iraq war at the time it started (I checked — and he did).
Is his memory getting a little shaky here?
Lanny Davis is the accountant who, when asked “how much is 2 + 2 ?” while applying for a job, answers “How much do you want it to be?”.
Ugh. That Rubin peace reads like the inner monologue of a 15 year-old girl contemplating drunk dialing the ex-boyfriend that just dumped her at 3 AM.
And Lanny Davis is about two months from being reduced to doing infomercials for the Flowbee. Of course, if the price is right, he’ll jump now.
That would make a great tweet, sir.
He should hit up his former clients in Honduras for some pelf; they should be quite the satisfied customers. After all, he got Hillary (and thus Barack) to stay their hands while the golpistas toppled Zelaya for the horrible crime of making the US t-shirt makers holed up in his country actually pay a minimum wage to their workers.
Could it be that the Hagel nomination is what finally breaks the taboo surrounding open discussion of AIPAC and its role in American politics? They’ve managed to piss off potential allies like gay pro-Israel blogger Jon Aravosis over this:
He’s a real life Henry Gondorff for the ethically and morally challenged.
In addition to moral center, Gondorff also had some charm.
I think Nathan Thurm is the droid you’re looking for.
“Israel Lobby”? It looks like the whole first three floors and the penthouse from where I’m standing.
That, sir, is the standard test answer for finance specialists on Wall Street and their accountants.
Wonder what Schmuck Schumer will do?
“….like the inner monologue of a 15 year-old girl contemplating drunk dialing the ex-…..”
This comparison combines sexist and agist(adultist) stereotypes.
You own them an apology and a promise to examine why using them this way appealed to you.
Isn’t Nanny your BFF?
and “Who’s paying you Lanny?” a compliment to his skills?
The Israel lobby not only has too much influence and plays the antisemite card if any opposes any of Israel’s policies or actions… but they’ve got their people inside of the policy apparatus of the DOD, state and so forth. Their partisans are/were IN government… in powerful positions.
Let’s get it all out… Israel is no angel…
Schumer will fall in line. This is all for show for him.
Don’t be fooled: this is a high-stakes fight. It’s not that Hagel is great and AIPAC is the Great Satan. But AIPAC has chosen to make this a big fight. If Obama folds without a fight – his m.o. in many other cases, especially personnel matters – it would pretty much constitute an admission that the US no longer controls its own foreign policy in southwest Asia.
The standard question (that will NEVER be asked) of Chuck Hagel’s Republican critics is, ” Are you (or your employer) currently or have you (or your employer) ever accepted money from AIPAC or any other overtly Jewish/pro-Israeli organization?
I have heard Republican pundit after pundit talk crap about Hagel. My first thought is that the check must be flying.
It will be curious to see how long Obama fights for Hagel. For progressives, Obama folds in seconds. For Hagel, I bet he goes to the mat.
TPMCafe at talkingpointsmemo.com was a great way to learn of internal Israeli politics, education, military and Jewish lobby groups like J Street and AIPAC. Then one of the bloggers in 2012 posted an in depth obituary of AIPAC and the ascension of J St.. Whether because of the article or lack of readers, after the Web redesign, TPMCafe disappeared with no explanation. Just wonder.
The first thing that any AIPAC rep will tell you – a big part of the “there is no AIPAC” line – is that AIPAC doesn’t have a PAC that gives out money. They have allies and associates who will be helpful – or hurtful – to a candidate based upon their attitude toward Israel. When AIPAC started, that meant support for a democratic Israel that swung back and forth between Labor and the right. These days, it just means support for Likud, Avigdor Lieberman, the settlements etc.
Okay. 35 year-old male divorcee drunk dialing his ex-wife? Can I step out from the corner now? Or are more blanket apologies and fruitless self-examination required? Unless, by self-examination, you mean checking for irregularly shaped moles? Do tell.
I don’t think Obama would have nominated Hagel if he didn’t think he had already enough Senate votes. Schumer and other NE Dem Senators will take a “wait and see” attitude as part of the Kabuki dance, and then fall into line. In the meantime, AIPAC and the embedded Israeli firsters in the media – Rubin, Kristol, Krauthammer, etc. will bitch and gnash their teeth all for nought. For better or worse, he will be confirmed.
Bingo ! Although I believe this question has already been asked and answered resoundingly and repeatedly. AIPAC obviously controls mid-east foreign policy, and has for at least 3 decades.
Nah, not completely. Otherwise, either Bush Baby or Obomber would have attacked Iran already, as Bibi tried to force them to do.
Nice piece. You’re starting to appeal to me, TBogg.
I disagree. The very fact that we’re contemplating an attack on Iran has everything to do with Israel.
I disagree with you. The oil companies also have something to do with this.
So they’re just like the MAFIA–er–”organized crime?”
After Mz. Hamsher messed him up on Tee Vee, I thot he died and went to where all reptilians go, no offense to reptiles?
Fuck Lanny Davis.
End of story.
Lanny would be a good example in that other thread, about jerking off.
*G*
Lanny’s more of the Pocket Fisherman type, methinks.
No offense to Ron Popeil.
JINSA owes the all jews and Jewish Americans an apology for it’s nosism, the antisemitic use of the inclusive “we”.
Hiring Lanny Davis- the biggest whore in politics this decade – is not going to win any hearts and minds, especially when compared to a man who can’t be bought by the MIC, which is really what this is about. Is he going to be delivering checks?
I guess we’ll have to wait to find out who paid him, but it will be another nail in the coffin for the racist Israeli colonial project – using false antisemitism charges to try to protect government largess for the industry of death – that’s a stench that isn’t going to go away.
I wonder about the choice of Hagel, but not for the reasons espoused by rent-boy Davis, who’s clearly willing to whore himself out to the Israelites.
I, too, wonder why a Democratic general, like Wes Clark, couldn’t have been nominated, even though I am often outspoken about the few & getting fewer differences between the Rs & Ds.
Whatever, Hagel clearly has not “toed the line” – aka kissed the “proper” butts – as his sell-out former “buddy” Ace-Maverick Ol Walnuts McCant has done… and hence, the Zionists have hired a local home-boy to attack Hegal. Can’t have someone who might, gasp shriek, somehow stick it to WAR, Inc., now can we?